This research presents a multimodal analysis of 189 infertility GIFs collected from the subreddit r/trollingforababy over a 12-month period. Drawing on symbolic interactionism and Bakhtinian concepts, the analysis examines how users repurpose popular culture imagery to narrate infertility struggles on digital platforms. Three major themes emerged: temporal disjuncture and the symbolic weight of waiting, dialogic resistance and carnivalesque inversion of infertility social scripts, and the grotesque medicalized body and the politics of visibility. Across the three themes, GIFs emerge as symbolic performances that enable users to negotiate stigma, build collective meaning, and resist dominant reproductive ideologies, positioning infertility as not only a medical and social condition but also a communicative site where meaning, identity, and agency are contested.
AksanNKısacBAydınM, et al. (2009) Symbolic interaction theory. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences1(1): 902–904.
2.
AlcantaraAAYocampoJMO (2022) Popular internet meme templates through the semiotic-symbolic interactionist lens: A look into meme culture. International Journal of Recent Innovations in Academic Research6(4): 53–59.
3.
ArafahBHasyimM (2023) Digital literacy: The right solution to overcome the various problems of meaning and communication on social media. Studies in Media and Communication11(4): 19–26.
4.
AylmerRAylmerMDiasM (2024) Psychological contract, symbolic interactionism, social exchange, and expectation violation theories: A literature review. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences2(2): 605–623.
5.
BakhshiSShammaDAKennedyL (2016) Fast, cheap, and good: Why animated GIFs engage us. In:Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp.575–586. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2858036.2858532.
6.
BakhtinMM (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. (EmersonC.HolquistM., Trans.) University of Texas Press.
7.
BakhtinMM (1984) Rabelais and His World. (IswolskyH., Trans.) Indiana University Press.
8.
BellAV (2016) Misconception: Social Class and Infertility in America. Rutgers University Press.
9.
BellSOMoreauCSarnakD, et al. (2024) Measuring non-events: Infertility estimation using cross-sectional, population-based data from four countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Human Reproduction39(12): 2848–2860.
10.
BanerjeeSGoswamiK (2021) The grotesque body in the coronavirus lockdown: Defining its aesthetics. Diálogos com a Arte-Revista de Arte, Cultura e Educação8.
11.
BerlantL (2011) Cruel Optimism. Duke University Press.
12.
BlakemoreJKBayerAHSmithMB, et al. (2020) Infertility influencers: An analysis of information and influence in the fertility webspace. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics37(6): 1371–1378.
13.
BlumerH (1969) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. University of California Press.
14.
BornsteinMGipsonJDFailingG, et al. (2020) Individual and community-level impact of infertility-related stigma in Malawi. Social Science & Medicine251: 112910.
15.
CarterMJFullerC (2016) Symbols, meaning, and action: The past, present, and future of symbolic interactionism. Current Sociology64(6): 931–961.
16.
CamposAQGomezLRS (2016) Trend research: A methodology foundation. Senses & Sensibility 2015 Special Issue1–15.
17.
ChurchSHKingJRobinsonT, et al. (2023) Relating, searching, and referencing: Assessing the appeal of using GIFs to communicate. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies29(3): 730–745.
18.
FranklinS (1997) Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. Routledge.
19.
FranzkeASBechmannAZimmerMet al. (2020) Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0. Available at: https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf (accessed 15 November 2025).
20.
GlinieckaM (2023) The ethics of publicly available data research: A situated ethics framework for Reddit. Social Media + Society9(3): 20563051231192021.
21.
GoffmanE (1959) The moral career of the mental patient. Psychiatry22(2): 123–142.
22.
Gomez PalomaF (2017) Embodied cognition and second language teaching/learning. In: Gomez PalomaF (ed.) Embodied Cognition. New York: Nova Science Publishers, pp. 89–110.
23.
GreilALSlauson-BlevinsKMcQuillanJ (2010) The experience of infertility: A review of recent literature. Sociology of Health & Illness32(1): 140–162.
24.
GuestGBunceAJohnsonL (2006) How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods18(1): 59–82.
25.
HannaEGoughB (2020) The social construction of male infertility: A qualitative questionnaire study of men with a male factor infertility diagnosis. Sociology of Health & Illness42(3): 465–480.
26.
HautschJ (2018) Tumblr’s Supernatural fandom and the rhetorical affordance of GIFs. Transformative Works and Cultures27: 27.
27.
HocaogluC (2019) The psychosocial aspect of infertility. In: SheriffDS (ed.) Infertility, Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Hormone Assays. London: IntechOpen, pp. 1–14.
28.
IordachescuDAGicaCVladislavEO, et al. (2021) Emotional disorders, marital adaptation, and the moderating role of social support for couples under treatment for infertility. Ginekologia Polska92(2): 98–104.
29.
JiaXPangYLiuLS (2021) Online health information seeking behavior: A systematic review. Healthcare9(12): 1740.
30.
KimJLópez SintasJ (2021) Social TV viewers’ symbolic parasocial interactions with media characters: A topic modelling analysis of viewers’ comments. Social Sciences & Humanities Open3(1): 100129.
31.
KressGBezemerJ (2023) Multimodal discourse analysis. In: TannenDHamiltonHESchiffrinD (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 2nd edn.Routledge, pp.139–155.
32.
LayneLL (2003) Motherhood Lost: A Feminist Account of Pregnancy Loss in America. Routledge.
33.
LinJWShoreyS (2023) Online peer support communities in the infertility journey: A systematic mixed-studies review. International Journal of Nursing Studies140: 104454.
34.
LogiLZappavignaM (2024) GIFs as social media paralanguage. Language22(special): 32–56.
35.
MiltnerKMHighfieldT (2017) Never gonna GIF you up: Analyzing the cultural significance of the animated GIF. Social Media + Society3(3): 2056305117725223.
36.
Moreno-AlmeidaC (2024) Memes, Monsters, and the Digital Grotesque. Oxford University Press.
37.
Nahon-SerfatyI (2022) Grotesque transparency and public health communication: The aesthetics and the ethics of ill bodies in the era of digital networks. Journal of Public Health44(4): e562–e566.
38.
PansiriJ (2023) Methodological choices in tourism: A review of the application of symbolic interactionism in tourism and hospitality studies. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure12(1): 351–369.
39.
ProcenteseFGattiFDi NapoliI (2019) Families and social media use: The role of parents’ perceptions about social media impact on family systems in the relationship between family collective efficacy and open communication. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health16(24): 5006.
40.
ShifmanL (2014) The cultural logic of photo-based meme genres. Journal of Visual Culture13(3): 340–358.
41.
SormunenTKarlgrenKAanesenA, et al. (2020) The role of social media for persons affected by infertility. BMC Women’s Health20(1): 112.
42.
TavousiSABehjatiMMilajerdiA, et al. (2022) Psychological assessment in infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology13: 961722.
43.
ThrosbyK (2004) When IVF Fails: Feminism, Infertility and the Negotiation of Normality. Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
TolinsJSamermitP (2016) GIFs as embodied enactments in text-mediated conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction49(2): 75–91.
45.
van LeeuwenTBezemerJ (2024) Gunther Kress - Explorer of the semiotic landscape. Text and Talk44(4): 439–446.
46.
VigneswaranKElfakiNDevgunKet al. (2024) #Infertility: A systematic review of information available on social media platforms. Human Reproduction39(Suppl. 1): deae108–180.
47.
WagenerA (2021) The postdigital emergence of memes and GIFs: Meaning, discourse, and hypernarrative creativity. Postdigital Science and Education3(3): 831–850.
48.
WangMBhuiyanMMRhoEHR, et al. (2024) Understanding the relationship between social identity and self-expression through animated GIFs on social media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction8(CSCW1): 1–30.
49.
WestbrookF (2023) How to analyse emojis, GIFs, embedded images, videos, and URLs: A Bakhtinian methodological approach. Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy8(1): 1–25.
50.
WhiteRECooperK (2022) Qualitative Research in the Post-Modern Era. Cham: Springer.
