In response to the many pressures facing public higher education, public universities are experimenting with business-oriented practices that seem likely to alter their nature and purposes. In this paper, we examine several hybrid experiments—new organizational strategies intended deliberately, sometimes explicitly, to hybridize the traditional norms and practices associated with academia and business at one emblematic public university. These cases illustrate how each hybrid experiment is a tacit response to existing norms and strategies that govern the university–business boundary, initiated as a hedge against the challenging fiscal and political climate. Taken together, they do not lead to a unitary and/or linear spread of business codes and practices. Instead, what some have referred to as “business logic” appears multifaceted, having many elements that are deployed, institutionalized, and perceived differently in different contexts, even within a single university.
AlbertsBruceKirschnerMarc W.TighlmanShirleyVarmusHarold, 2014. “Rescuing US Biomedical Research from Its Systemic Flaws.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111 (16): 5773–77.
BoyleJames. 1997. Shamans, Software and Spleens: Law and Construction of the Information Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
DevittTerry. 2013. “UW-Madison, WARF Announce New Tech Transfer Partnership.” University of Wisconsin-Madison, News, November 12. Accessed July 25, 2014. http://www.news.wisc.edu/22287.
Dow Chemical Company. 2011b. “Dow Commits $25 Million per Year to Advance Research & Development in Leading U.S. Universities,” (press release) October 4. Accessed July 26, 2014. http://www.dow.com/innovation/pdf/partnership/20111004a.pdf.
DowneyGregFeinsteinNoah WeethKleinmanDaniel LeeFukadaChisatoPetersonSigrid. 2017. “Dreaming and Living Interdisciplinarity: The Case of the Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery.” In Investigating Interdisciplinary Research: Theory and Practice Across the Disciplines, edited by FrickelScottAlbertMathieuPrainsackBarbara, 47-64.Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
11.
EtzkowitzHenryWebsterAndrewHealeyPeter. 1998. Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia. Albany: State University of New York Press.
12.
GeigerRoger L.1993. Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities since World War II. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
GibbonsMichaelLimogesCamilleNowotnyHelgaSchwartzmanSimonScottPeterTrowMartin. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London, UK: Sage.
14.
HollowayKelly Joslin. 2015. “Normalizing Complaint: Scientists and the Challenge of Commercialization.” Science, Technology, & Human Values40 (5): 744–65.
15.
KleinmanDaniel Lee. 2003. Impure Cultures: University Biology and the World of Commerce. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
16.
KleinmanDaniel Lee. 2005. Science and Technology in Society: From Biotechnology to the Internet. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
17.
KleinmanDaniel Lee. 2015. “Sticking Up for the Liberal Arts and Humanities Education: Governance, Leadership and Fiscal Crisis.” In A New Deal for the Humanities, edited by MohamedFeisalHutnerGordon, 86-100. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
18.
KleinmanDaniel Lee. 2016. “From Matters of Integrity to Cultural Transformation: Higher Education in the Era of Neoliberalism.” In Handbook of Academic Integrity, edited by BretagTracey, 929–41. New York: Springer.
19.
KleinmanDaniel LeeDowneyGregWeeth-FeinsteinNoah. 2016. “Imagining Success: “The Rhetoric of Innovative Science in the Mode 2 World.”” Peking University Education Review14 (1): 2–12 (Published in Chinese).
20.
KleinmanDaniel LeeFeinsteinNoah WeethDowneyGreg. 2013. “Beyond Commercialization: Science, Higher Education, and the Culture of Neoliberalism.” Science and Education22 (10): 2385–401.
21.
KleinmanDaniel LeeVallasSteven. 2001. “Science, Capitalism, and the Rise of the ‘Knowledge Worker’: The Changing Structure of Knowledge Production in the United States.” Theory and Society30 (4): 451–92.
22.
LessigLawrence. 2002. The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. New York: Vintage Books.
23.
LounsburyMichael. 2007. “A Tale of Two Cities: Competing Logics and Practice Variation in the Professionalizing of Mutual Funds.” Academy of Management50 (2): 289–307.
24.
MannMichael. 1986. The Sources of Social Power. Volume I: A History of Social Power from the Beginning to AD 1760. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
McMathRobert C.BayorRonald H.BrittainJames E.FosterLawrenceGiebelhausAugustReedGermaine M.. 1985. Engineering the New South: Goergia Tech, 1885-1985. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
26.
MertonR. K. (1942) 1973. “The Normative Structure of Science.” In The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, edited by MertonR. K., 267–78. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MitchellMichaelLeachmanMichaelMastersonKathleen. 2016. “Funding Down, Tuition Up: State Cuts to Higher Education Threaten Quality and Affordability at Public Colleges.” Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. Accessed November 26, 2016. http://www.cbpp.org/research/state-budget-and-tax/funding-down-tuition-up.
MurrayFiona. 2010. “The Oncomouse that Roared: Hybrid Exchange Strategies as a Source of Distinction at the Boundary of Overlapping Institutions.” American Journal of Sociology116 (2): 341–88.
31.
National Science Board. 2012. Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. Arlington VA: National Science Foundation (NSB 12-01).
32.
NobleDavid. 1977. America by Design: Science, Technology and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
SchneibergMarc. 2007. “What’s on the Path? Path Dependence, Organizational Diversity and the Problem of Institutional Change in the US Economy, 1900–1950.” Socio-economic Review5 (1): 47–80.
34.
SchneibergMarc. 2013. “Movements as Political Conditions for Diffusion: Anti-corporate Movements and the Spread of Cooperative Forms in American Capitalism.” Organization Studies34 (5-6): 653–82.
35.
SchneibergMarcSouleSarah A.. 2005. “Institutionalization as a Contested, Multi-level Process: The Case of Rate Regulation in American Fire Insurance.” In Social Movements and Organization Theory, edited by DavisGerald F.McAdamDougRichard ScottW.ZaldMayer N., 122–60. New York: Cambridge University Press.
ShinnTerry. 2002. “The Triple Helix and New Production of Knowledge: Prepackaged Thinking on Science and Technology.” Social Studies of Science32 (4): 599–614.
39.
SlaughterSheilaLeslieLarry. 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
VallasStevenKleinmanDaniel Lee. 2007. “Contradiction, Convergence and the Knowledge Economy: The Confluence of Academic and Commercial Biotechnology.” Socio-Economic Review6 (2): 283–311.
42.
WebsterAndrewEtzkowitzHenry. 1998. “Toward a Theoretical Analysis of Academic Industrial Collaboration.” In Capitalizing Knowledge, edited by EtzkowitzHenryWebsterAndrewHealyPeter, 47–72. Albany, NY: SUNY University Press.
43.
WrightErik Olin. 2010. Envisioning Real Utopias. New York: Verso.
