This editorial critically engages with the understanding of openness by attending to how notions of presence and absence come bundled together as part of efforts to make open. This is particularly evident in contemporary discourse around data production, dissemination, and use. We highlight how the preoccupations with making data present can be usefully analyzed and understood by tracing the related concerns around what is missing, unavailable, or invisible (“data shadows”), which unvaryingly but often implicitly accompany debates about data and openness.
BalmerBrian. 2013. Secrecy and Science: A Historical Sociology of Biological and Chemical Warfare. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
2.
BorgmanChristine L.2015. Big Data, Little Data, No Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
BowkerGeoffrey C.2000. “Biodiversity Datadiversity.” Social Studies of Science30 (5): 643–83.
4.
CoopmansCatelijne. 2014. “Visual Analytics as Artful Revelation.” In Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited, edited by CoopmansC.VertesiJ.LynchM.WoolgarS.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
DaviesGail. 2014. “Searching for GloFish®: Aesthetics, Ethics, and Encounters with the Neonbaroque.” Environment and Planning A46 (11): 2604–21.
6.
DaviesGailFrowEmmaLeonelliSabina. 2013. “Bigger, Faster, Better? Rhetorics and Practices of Large-scale Research in Contemporary Bioscience.” BioSocieties8 (4): 386–96.
7.
EdwardsPaul N.2010. A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
EdwardsPaul N.MayernikMatthew S.BatchellerArcher L.BowkerGeoffrey C.BorgmanChristine L.. 2011. “Science Friction: Data, Metadata, and Collaboration.” Social Studies of Science41 (5): 667–90.
9.
FarquharJudithRajanKaushik Sunder. 2014. “Introduction. Special Issue on Knowledge/Value: Information, Archives, Databases.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society8 (4): 383–89.
10.
GrossMathias. 2012. “‘Objective Culture’ and the Development of Nonknowledge: Georg Simmel and the Reverse Side of Knowing.” Cultural Sociology6 (4): 422–37.
11.
GrossMathiasMcGoeyLinsey. 2015. Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies. London, UK: Routledge.
HilgartnerSteven. 2012. “Selective Flows of Knowledge in Technoscientific Interaction: Information Control in Genome Research” British Society for the History of Science42 (2): 267–80.
14.
HineChristine. 2006. “Databases as Scientific Instruments and Their Role in the Ordering of Scientific Work.” Social Studies of Science36 (2): 269–98.
15.
KitchinRob. 2013. The Data Revolution. London, UK: Sage.
16.
LeonelliSabina. 2014. “What Difference Does Quantity Make? On the Epistemology of Big Data in Biology.” Big Data and Society1 (1): 1–11.
17.
LeonelliSabina. 2016. Data-centric Biology: A Philosophical Study. IL: Chicago University Press.
18.
MorganMary. 2012. The World in the Model. UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Open Knowledge Foundation. 2014. Open Science Definition. Accessed October 8, 2014. http://opendefinition.org/.
20.
ProctorRobert L.SchiebingerLinda, eds. 2008. Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
RappertBrian. 2009. Experimental Secrets: International Security, Codes, and the Future of Research. New York: University Press of America.
22.
RappertBrian. 2015. “Sensing Absence.” In Absence in Science, Security and Policy, edited by RappertBrianBalmerBrian, 3–33. London, UK: Palgrave.
23.
Royal Society. 2012. Science as an Open Enterprise. London, UK: Royal Society.
24.
Science International. 2015. Open Data in a Big Data World. Accessed September 17, 2016.
25.
SmithWally. 2015. “Technologies of Stage Magic: Simulation and Dissimulation.” Social Studies of Science45 (3): 319–43. doi:10.1177/0306312715577461.
26.
Sunder RajanKaushik. 2006. Biocapital. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
27.
WylieAlison. 2002. Thinking from Things: Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
28.
WylieAlison. 2006. “When Difference Makes a Difference: Introduction.” Episteme: Journal of Social Epistemology3 (1-2): 1–7.
29.
WynneBrian. 1992. “Misunderstood Misunderstandings: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science.” Public Understanding of Science1 (3): 281–304.
