This article examines changes and continuities in the epistemic and methodological presence of “race” in British imperial demography from 1920 to 1960. It does so in relation to population-level interventions aimed at improving reproduction in the New Hebrides. Through an examination of the sex ratio in relation to debates about demographic decline, the article describes aspects of how sexual selection was connected to race thinking. Taking a balanced sex ratio as a marker of well-adapted, healthy populations—biologically and culturally—the British authorities in the New Hebrides attempted to regulate the bride price in an attempt to level the imbalanced sex ratio. They believed that this intervention would reduce the marriage age of men while also appeasing missionary agendas of changing marriage and kinship practices. I use the metaphor of a “watermark” to think through the conceptual and methodological absent/presence of race in colonial demography and colonial administrators’ attitudes toward and interventions in local reproductive practices.
AndersonWarwick. 2009. “Ambiguities of Race: Science on the Reproductive Frontier of Australia and the Pacific between the Wars.”Australian Historical Studies40 (2): 143–60.
2.
BakerJohn Randall. 1928. “Depopulation in Espiritu Santo, New Hebrides.”Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland58 (January-June): 279–303.
3.
BakerJohn Randall. 1929. Man and Animals in the New Hebrides. London, UK: Routledge.
4.
BarkanElazar. 1992. The Retreat of Scientific Racism: Changing Concepts of Race in Britain and the United States between the World Wars. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BoddyJanice P.2007. Civilizing Women: British Crusades in Colonial Sudan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
CohnBernard S.1996. Colonialism and its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
DouglasBronwenBallardChris, eds. 2008. Foreign Bodies: Oceania and the Science of Race 1750 – 1940. Canberra, Australia: Australia National University E-Press.
8.
EdwardsAnthony W. F.1998. “Natural Selection and the Sex Ratio: Fisher's Sources.”American Naturalist151(6): 564–69.
9.
GannettLisa. 2001. “Racism and Human Genome Diversity Research: The Ethical Limits of Population Thinking.”Philosophy of Science63 (3): S479–92.
10.
GreenhalghSusan. 1996. “The Social Construction of Population Science: An Intellectual, Institutional, and Political History of 20th Century Demography.”Comparative Studies in Society and History38 (1): 26–66.
11.
HawleyAmos H.1959. “Population Composition.” In The Study of Population, edited by HauserPhilip M.DuncanOtis D., 361–82. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
HuxleyJulian. 1922. “Notes and Memoranda.”The Eugenics Review13 (4): 499–559.
13.
IttmannKarl. 1999. “The Colonial Office and the Population Question in the British Empire, 1918-1962.”The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History27 (3): 55–81.
14.
IttmannKarl. 2003. “Demography as Policy Science in the British Empire, 1918-1969.”Journal of Policy History15 (4): 417–48.
15.
IttmannKarl. 2010. “‘Where Nature Dominates Man’: Demographic Ideas and Policy in British Colonial Africa, 1890-1970.” In The Demographics of Empire: The Colonial Order and the Creation of Knowledge, edited by IttmannKarlCordellDennis D.MaddoxGregory H., 59–88. Athens: Ohio University Press.
16.
JollyMargaret. 1991. “‘To Save the Girls for Brighter and Better Lives’: Presbyterian Missions and Women in the South of Vanuatu: 1848-1870.”Journal of Pacific History26 (1): 27–48.
17.
JollyMargaret. 2007. “Oceanic Hauntings? Race-culture-place between Vanuatu and Hawai’i.”Journal of Intercultural Studies28 (1): 99–112.
18.
LaqueurThomas. 1990. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
LipphardtVeronika. 2012. “Isolates and Crosses in Human Population Genetics, or: A Contextualization of German Race Science.”Current Anthropology53 (5): S69–82.
20.
MalthusThomas R.1798. An Essay on the Principle of Population. London, UK: J. Johnson.
21.
McArthurNormaYaxleyJ. F.. 1968. Condominium of the New Hebrides; a Report on the First Census of the Population 1967. Sydney: New South Wales Government Printer.
22.
M’charekAmade. 2010. “Fragile Differences, Relational Effects: Stories about the Materiality of Race and Sex.”European Journal of Women's Studies17(4): 307–22.
23.
MitchellJean. 2000. “Violence as Continuity: Violence as Rupture—Narratives from an Urban Settlement in Vanuatu.” In Reflections on Violence in Melanesia, edited by DinnenSinclairLeyAllison, 180–208. Canberra, Australia: Asia Pacific Press.
24.
ParkesA. S.1923. “The Respective Sex-ratios of White and Coloured Races.”Man23 (October): 155–57.
ParkesA. S.1925. “Studies on the Sex Ratio and Related Phenomena: The Effect of Polygyny.”Annals of Applied Biology12 (2): 211–7.
27.
ParkesA. S.1926a. “The Mammalian Sex Ratio.”Biological Reviews2 (1): 1–51.
28.
ParkesA. S.1926b. “The Physiological Factors Governing the Proportions of the Sexes in Man.”The Eugenics Review17 (4): 275–93.
29.
PearlMaud DeWittPearlRaymond. 1908. “On the Relation of Race Crossing to the Sex Ratio.”Biological Bulletin15 (4): 194–205.
30.
PearlRaymondSalamanRadcliffe. 1913. “The Relative Time of Fertilization of the Ovum and Sex Ratio amongst Jews.”American Anthropologist15 (4): 668–74.
31.
Pitt-RiversGeorge H. L. F.1924. “Variations in Sex ratios as Indices of Racial Decline. A Short Summary of a Paper Read at the Melbourne Meeting of the Pan-Pacific Science Congress, Australia 1923.”Man24 (June): 87–89.
32.
Pitt-RiversGeorge H. L. F.1927a. “Sex Ratios and Cultural Contact.”Man27 (March): 59–60.
33.
Pitt-RiversGeorge H. L. F.1927b. “The Effect on Native Races of Contact with European Civilisation.”Man27 (January): 2–10.
34.
Pitt-RiversGeorge H. L. F.1927c. TheClash of Culture and the Contact of Races: An Anthropological and Psychological Study of the Laws of Racial Adaptability, with Special Reference to the Depopulation of the Pacific and the Government of Subject Races. London, UK: Routledge.
35.
Pitt-RiversGeorge H. L. F.1928. “Depopulation in Melanesia.”Man28 (December): 213–5.
36.
Pitt-RiversGeorge H. L. F1932. Problems of Population. London, UK: Allen and Unwin.
37.
RamKalpanaJollyMargaret. 1998. Maternities and Modernities: Colonial and Postcolonial Experiences in Asia and the Pacific. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
38.
RamsdenEdmund. 2002. “Carving Up Population Science: Eugenics, Demography and the Controversy over the ‘Biological Law’ of Population Growth.”Social Studies of Science32 (5-6): 857–99.
39.
RawlingsGregory. 2011. “Statelessness, Citizenship and Annotated Discrimination: Meta Documents, and the Aesthetics of the Subtle at the United Nations.”History and Anthropology22 (4): 461–79.
40.
ReardonJenny. 2005. Race to the Finish: Identity and Governance in an Age of Genomics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
RiversW. H. R.1922. “The Psychological Factor.” In Essays on the Depopulation of Melanesia, edited by RiversW. H. R., 84–113. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
42.
RodmanMargaret. 1987. Masters of Tradition: Consequences of Customary Land Tenure inLongana, Vanuatu. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
43.
SangerMargaret, ed. 1927. World Population Conference Proceedings. London, UK: Edward, Arnold.
44.
SoberElliot. 2007. “Sex Ratio Theory, Ancient and Modern—An 18th Century Debate About Intelligent Design and the Development of Models in Evolutionary Biology.” In Genesis Redux: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Artificial Life, edited by RiskinJessica, 131–62. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45.
SolowayRichard A.1990. Demography and Degeneration: Eugenics and the Declining Birth Rate in Twentieth Century Britain. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
46.
StolerAnn Laura. 1997. “Racial Histories and Their Regimes of Truth.”Political Power and Social Theory11:183–206.
47.
StolerAnn Laura. 2009. Along the Archival Grain: Epistemic Anxieties and Colonial Common Sense. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
ThompsonWarren S.LewisDavid T.. 1965. Population Problems. New York: McGraw-Hill.
49.
WadePeter. 2007. Race, Ethnicity and Nation: Perspectives from Kinship and Genetics. New York: Berghahn Books.
50.
WidmerAlexandra. 2012. “Of Field Encounters and Metropolitan Debates: Research and the Making and Meaning of the Melanesian ‘Race’ during Demographic Decline.”Paideuma58:69–93.
51.
WidmerAlexandra. 2013. “Seeing Health Like a Colonial State: Assistant Medical Practitioners and Nascent Biomedical Citizenship in the New Hebrides.” Pp. 200–20. In Senses and Citizenships: Embodying Political Life, edited by TrnkaS.ParkJ.DureauC.. New York: Routledge.
52.
YoungRobert. 1995. Colonial Desire: Hybridity in Theory, Culture and Race. New York: Routledge.
