This article argues that Gilbert Simondon’s philosophy of technology is useful for both science and technology studies (STS) and critical theory. The synthesis has political implications. It offers an argument for the rationality of democratic interventions by citizens into decisions concerning technology. The new framework opens a perspective on the radical transformation of technology required by ecological modernization and sustainability. In so doing, it suggests new applications of STS methods to politics as well as a reconstruction of the Frankfurt School’s “rational critique of reason.”
HottoisGilbert. 1993. Simondon et la philosphie de la ‘culture technique’. Bruxelles: Le Point Philosophique.
15.
JasanoffSheila. 2004. “The Idiom of Co-production.” In States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order, edited by JasanoffS., 1–12. London, UK: Routledge.
16.
LatourBruno. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
17.
LatourBruno. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by PorterC.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
LatourBruno. (1995). “A Door Must Be Either Open or Shut: A Little Philosophy of Techniques.” In Technology and the Politics of Knowledge, edited by HannayA.FeenbergA., 272–81. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
19.
LatourBruno. (1999). La Politique de la Nature. Paris, France: La Découverte.
20.
LynchMichael. 1993. Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
PinchTrevorBijkerWiebe. 1987. “The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems, edited by WiebeBijkerThomasHughesTrevorPinch,17–50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
SimondonGilbert. 1958. Du Mode d’Existence des Objets Techniques. Paris, France: Aubier.
25.
SimondonGilbert. 1989. L’individuation psychique et collective. Paris, France: Aubier.
26.
SimondonGilbert. 2005. L Invention dans les Techniques. Paris, France: Seuil.
27.
StieglerBernard. 1994. “La maïeutique de l’objet comme organisation de l’inorganique.” In Bibliothèque du Collège International de Philosophie, Gilbert Simondon: Une pensée de l’individuation et de la technique, 239–62. Paris, France: Albin Michel.
WinnerLangdon. 1992. “Social Constructivism: Opening the Black Box and Finding it Empty.” Science as Culture3 (16): 427–52.
30.
WyattSally. 2008. “Technological Determinism Is Dead: Long Live Technological Determinism.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by EdwardJ.HackettOlga AmsterdamskaLynchMichaelWajcmanJudy, 165–80. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
