In contested areas of environmental research and policy, all stakeholders are likely to claim that their position is scientifically grounded but disagree about the relevant scientific conclusions or the weight of the evidence. In this article, I draw on a year of participant observation and over 110 in-depth interviews, with the case study of controversial chemicals used as flame retardants in consumer products. I develop the concept of strategic science translation (SST), the process of interpreting and communicating scientific evidence to an intended audience in order to advance certain goals and interests. Engaging in selective, interpretive, or inaccurate SST allows competing stakeholders to bolster their arguments, strengthen their authority, and inspire change regarding a policy-relevant issue. Because stakeholders deploy imbalanced resources when they participate in contested environmental fields, their actions in those fields and the resulting policy outcomes often reduce not to the settling of scientific truths but to power differentials.
BabbageCharles. (1930) 1989. The Works of Charles Babbage: Volume 7, edited by Campbell-KellyMartin. New York: New York University Press.
6.
BabrauskasVytenisBlumArleneDaleyRebeccaBirnbaumLinda. 2011. “Flame Retardants in Furniture Foam: Benefits and Risks.” Fire Safety Science10:265–78.
7.
BettsKellyn. 2009. “Glut of Data on ‘New’ Flame Retardant Documents Its Presence All over the World.” Environmental Science & Technology43 (2): 236–37.
8.
BlumArlene. 2007. “The Fire Retardant Dilemma.” Science318 (5848): 194–95.
9.
BlumArleneAmesBruce. 1977. “Flame-retardant Additives as Possible Cancer Hazards.” Science195 (4273): 17–23.
10.
BourdieuPierre. 1991. “A Peculiar History of Scientific Reason.” Sociological Forum6 (1): 3–26.
BrownPhilCordnerAlissa. 2010. “Lessons Learned from Flame Retardant Use and Regulation Could Enhance Future Control of Potentially Hazardous Chemicals.” Health Affairs30 (5): 906–14.
13.
CallonMichel. 1986. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fisherman of St. Brieuc Bay.” In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, edited by LawJ.196–223. London, UK: Routledge.
14.
CarolanMichael. 2008. “The Bright- and Blind-spots of Science: Why Objective Knowledge Is Not Enough to Resolve Environmental Controversies.” Critical Sociology34 (5): 725.
15.
CollinsHarryEvansRobert. 2002. “The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience.” Social Studies of Science32 (2): 235–96.
CordnerAlissaBrownPhil. 2013. “Moments of Uncertainty: Ethical Considerations and Emerging Contaminants.” Sociological Forum28 (3): 469–94.
18.
CordnerAlissaBrownPhil. 2015. “A Multisector Alliance Approach to Environmental Social Movements: Flame Retardants and Chemical Reform in the United States.” Environmental Sociology1 (1): 69–79.
19.
CresseyDaniel. 2012. “Cancer-causing Flame Retardants Linger on in California.” Nature News, November 2012. doi: 10.1038/nature.2012.11910.
20.
DiGangiJoeBlumArleneBergmanÅkede WitCynthiaLucasDonaldMortimerDavidSchecterArnoldScheringerMartinShawSusanWebsterThomas. 2010. “San Antonio Statement on Brominated and Chlorinated Flame Retardants.” Environmental Health Perspectives118 (12): A516–18.
21.
DodsonRobinPerovichLauraCovaciAdrianVan den EedeNeleIonasAlinDirtuAlinBrodyJuliaRudelRuthann. 2012. “After the PBDE Phase-out: A Broad Suite of Flame Retardants in Repeat House Dust Samples from California.” Environmental Science & Technology46 (24): 13056–66.
22.
EggintonJoyce. 2009. The Poisoning of Michigan. New York: Norton.
23.
FrickelScottEdwardsMichelle. 2014. “Untangling Ignorance in Environmental Risk Assessment.” In Powerless Science? Science and Politics in a Toxic World, edited by BoudiaS.JasN.215–33. New York: Berghahn Books.
24.
FrickelScottGibbonSahraHowardJeffKempnerJoannaOttingerGwenHessDavid. 2010. “Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting.” Science, Technology, & Human Values35 (4): 444–76.
25.
FrickelScottGrossNeil. 2005. “A General Theory of Scientific/Intellectual Movements.” American Sociological Review70 (2): 204–32.
26.
FrickelScottMooreKelly. 2006. The New Political Sociology of Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
27.
GagnonChantal. 2010. “Political Translation.” In Handbook of Translation Studies: Volume 12, edited by GambierYvesvan DoorslaerLuc252–56. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
28.
GauchatGordon. 2012. “Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere: A Study of Public Trust in the United States, 1974-2010.” American Sociological Review72 (2): 167–87.
29.
GoodmanJulieBriesemeierJohnJohnsonGiffeHarbisonCaseyHarbisonRaymondZhuYiliangLeeRichardSilberbergHannaHardyMarciaStedefordTodd. 2010. “Fecundability and Serum PBDE Concentrations in Women.” Environmental Health Perspectives118 (8): A330.
30.
GrossMatthias. 2007. “The Unknown in Process: Dynamic Connections of Ignorance, Non-knowledge and Related Concepts.” Current Sociology55 (5): 742–59.
31.
GustonDavid H.1999. “Changing Explanatory Frameworks in the U.S. Government’s Attempt to Define Research Misconduct.” Science and Engineering Ethics5 (2): 137–54.
32.
HarleyKimJewellNicholasAguilarRaulMarksAmyChevrierJonathanBradmanAsaEskenaziBrenda. 2010. “PBDE Concentrations in Women: Harley et al. Respond.” Environmental Health Perspectives118 (8): A330–31.
33.
HechtGabrielle. 2012. Being Nuclear: Africans and the Global Uranium Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
HessDavid. 2009. “The Potentials and Limitations of Civil Society Research: Getting Undone Science Done.” Sociological Inquiry79 (3): 306–27.
35.
JasanoffSheila. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. London, UK: Routledge.
36.
KemplerJoannaMerzJon F.BoskCharles L.. 2011. “Forbidden Knowledge: Public Controversy and the Production of Nonknowledge.” Sociological Forum26 (3): 475–500.
37.
KimYoung RanHardenFiona A.TomsLeisa-Maree L.NormanRosana. 2014. “Health Consequences of Exposure to Brominated Flame Retardants: A Systematic Review.” Chemosphere106 (July): 1–19.
38.
KinchyAbby J.2010. “Anti-genetic Engineering Activism and Scientized Politics in the Case of ‘Contaminated’ Mexican Maize.” Agriculture and Human Values27 (4): 505–17.
39.
KleinmanDanielSuryanarayananSainath. 2012. “Dying Bees and the Social Production of Ignorance.” Science, Technology & Human Values38 (4): 492–517.
40.
KrimskySheldon. 2005. “The Funding Effect in Science and Its Implications for the Judiciary.” Journal of Law and Policy8 (1): 43–68.
41.
LatourBruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
MacGillivrayBrian HectorAlcockRuthBusbyJerry. 2011. “Is Risk-based Regulation Feasible? The Case of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs).” Risk Analysis31 (2): 266–81.
43.
MarkowitzGeraldRosnerDavid. 2002. Deceit and Denial: The Deadly Politics of Industrial Pollution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
44.
McCormickSabrina. 2007. “Democratizing Science Movements: A New Framework for Mobilization and Contestation.” Social Studies of Science37 (4): 609–23.
45.
McCrightAaronDunlapRiley. 2011. “The Politicization of Climate Change and the Polarization in the American Public’s Views of Global Warming, 2001-2010.” The Sociological Quarterly52 (2): 155–94.
46.
McGoeyLinsey. 2012. “Strategic Unknowns: Towards a Sociology of Ignorance.” Economy and Society41 (1): 1–16.
47.
MeironyteDaivaNorenKoiduBergmanAke. 1999. “Analysis of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers in Swedish Human Milk. A Time-related Trend Study, 1972-1997.” Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health58 (6): 329–41.
48.
MertonRobert KingStorerNorman William. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MichaelsDavid. 2005. “Scientific Evidence and Public Policy.” American Journal of Public Health95 (S1): S5–S7.
51.
MichaelsDavid. 2008. Doubt Is Their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens Your Health. New York: Oxford University Press.
52.
MichaelsDavidMonfortonCeleste. 2005. “Manufacturing Uncertainty: Contested Science and the Protection of the Public’s Health and Environment.” American Journal of Public Health95 (S1): S39–48.
53.
MooreKelly. 2008. Disrupting Science: Social Movements, American Scientists, and the Politics of the Military, 1945-1975. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
MooreKellyKleinmanDanielHessDavidFrickelScott. 2011. “Science and Neoliberal Globalization: A Political Sociological Approach.” Theory & Society40 (5): 505–32.
55.
Morello-FroschRachelZavestoskiStephenBrownPhilAltmanRebecca GasiorMcCormickSabrinaMayerBrian. 2006. “Embodied Health Movements: Responses to a ‘Scientized’ World.” In The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power, edited by FrickelScottMooreKelly244–71. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
OreskesNaomiConwayErik. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
58.
PanofskyAaron. 2011. “Field Analysis and Interdisciplinary Science: Scientific Capital Exchange in Behavior Genetics.” Minerva49 (3): 295–316.
59.
PetrynaAdriana. 2002. Life Exposed: Biological Citizens after Chernobyl. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60.
ProctorRobertSchiebingerLonda. 2008. Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
ReichMichael. 1983. “Environmental Politics and Science: The Case of PBB Contamination in Michigan.” American Journal of Public Health73 (3): 302–13.
63.
RudelRuthannCamannDavidSpenglerJohnKornLeoBrodyJulia. 2003. “Phthalates, Alkylphenols, Pesticides, Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers, and Other Endocrine-disrupting Compounds in Indoor Air and Dust.” Environmental Science & Technology37 (20): 4543–53.
64.
ShapiroNicholas. 2014. “Un-knowing Exposure: Toxic Emergency Housing, Strategic Inclusivity and Governance in the US Gulf South.” In Knowledge, Technology and Law, edited by CloatreEmiliePickersgillMartyn189–205. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.
65.
SismondoSergio. 2010. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Limited.
66.
StapletonHeatherSharmaSmritiGetzingerGordonLee FergusonP.GabrielMichelleWebsterThomasBlumArlene. 2012. “Novel and High Volume Use Flame Retardants in US Couches Reflective of the 2005 PentaBDE Phase out.” Environmental Science & Technology46 (24): 13432–39.
U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission. 1977. News from CPSC: CSPS Bans TRIS-treated Children’s Garments. Release # 77-030. Washington, DC: Office of Information and Public Affairs. Accessed March 22, 2013. http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml77/77030.h.
69.
U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2011. Design for the Environment Program Alternatives Assessment Criteria for Hazard Evaluation. Washington, DC: U.S. EPA.
70.
U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2012. Comments on the Design for the Environment (DfE) Program Alternatives Assessment for the Flame Retardant Decabromodiphenyl Ether. Washington, DC: U.S. EPA.
71.
U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2014. An Alternatives Assessment for the Flame Retardant Decabromodiphenyl Ether (DecaBDE). Washington, DC: U.S. EPA.
72.
VogelSarah A.2013. Is It Safe? BPA and the Struggle to Define the Safety of Chemicals. Berkeley: University of California Press.
73.
WeartSpencer. 2011. “Global Warming: How Skepticism Became Denial.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists67 (1): 41–50.
74.
WingSteve. 1994. “The Limits of Epidemiology.” Journal of Radiological Protection: Official Journal of the Society for Radiological Protection1 (2): 74–86.
75.
WoodhouseEdward. 2006. “Nanoscience, Green Chemistry, and the Privilege Position of Science.” In Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance, edited by FrickelScottMooreKelly148–81. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
