This special issue reflects a variety of methodological and critical perspectives on contemporary issues regarding social concerns, public engagement, and governance of gene editing in agriculture.
ChilversJasonKearnesMatthew. 2020. “Remaking Participation in Science and Democracy.” Science, Technology, & Human Values45 (3): 347–80.
2.
ChilversJasonPallettHelen. 2018. “Energy Democracies and Publics in the Making: A Relational Agenda for Research and Practice.” Frontiers in Communication3: 14.
3.
CummingsChristopher L.PetersDavid. 2022. “Gene-Edited Foods and the Public: The First Representative Survey Study of the United States.” Environmental Communication: 1–10.
4.
GordonDoria R.JaffeGregoryDoaneMichaelGlaserAvivaGremillionThomas M.HoMelissa D.. 2021. “Responsible Governance of Gene Editing in Agriculture and the Environment.” Nature Biotechnology39 (9): 1055–57.
5.
GouldFredAmasinoRichard M.BrossardDominiqueRobin BuellC.DixonRichard A.Falck-ZepedaJose B.GalloMichael A., et al.2022. “Toward Product-based Regulation of Crops.” Science377 (6610): 1051–53.
6.
HelliwellRichardHartleySarahPearceWarren. 2019. “NGO Perspectives on the Social and Ethical Dimensions of Plant Genome-editing.” Agriculture and Human Values36: 779–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09956-9
7.
JaffeGregoryKuzmaJennifer. 2021. “New Bioengineered (aka GM) Food Disclosure Law: Useful Information or Consumer Confusion.” Food Drug and Law Institute Magazine, Summer.
8.
JasanoffSheila. 1995. “Product, Process, or Programme: Three Cultures and the Regulation of Biotechnology.” Resistance to New Technology311: 31.
9.
JasanoffSheila. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
JasanoffSheilaBenjamin HurlbutJ.. 2018. “A Global Observatory for Gene Editing.” Nature555 (7697): 435–37.
11.
JasanoffSheilaKimSang-Hyun. 2009. “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea.” Minerva47: 119–46.
12.
Jenkins-SmithHank C.NohrstedtDanielWeibleChristopher M.SabatierPaul A.. 2014. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Foundations, Evolution, and Ongoing Research.” Theories of the Policy Process3: 183–224.
13.
LevidowLes. 2001. “Precautionary Uncertainty: Regulating GM Crops in Europe.” Social Studies of Science31 (6): 842–74.
14.
LindbergSonjaBainCarmenSelfaTheresa. 2023. “Regulating Gene Editing in Agriculture and Food in the European Union: Disentangling Expectations and Path Dependencies.” Sociologia Ruralis63 (2): 348–69.
15.
MacnaghtenPhil. 2021. “Towards an Anticipatory Public Engagement methodology: Deliberative Experiments in the Assembly of Possible Worlds Using Focus Groups.” Qualitative Research21 (1): 3–19.
16.
MacnaghtenPhilHabetsMichelle GJL. 2020. “Breaking the Impasse: Towards a Forward-looking Governance Framework for Gene Editing with Plants.” Plants, People, Planet2 (4): 353–65.
17.
MacnaghtenPhilDaviesSarah R.KearnesMatthew. 2019. “Understanding Public Responses to Emerging Technologies: A Narrative Approach.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning21 (5): 504–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1053110
18.
McAdamDougTarrowSidneyTillyCharles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
19.
MiddelveldSennaMacnaghtenPhilMeijboomFranck. 2023. “Imagined Futures for Livestock Gene Editing: Public Engagement in the Netherlands.” Public Understanding of Science32 (2): 143–58.
Montenegro de WitMaywa. 2020b. “Democratizing CRISPR? Stories, Practices, and Politics of Science and Governance on the Agricultural Gene Editing Frontier.” Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene8 (2020): 9.
SchurmanRachel. 2004. “Fighting “Frankenfoods”: Industry Opportunity Structures and the Efficacy of the Anti-biotech Movement in Western Europe.” Social Problems51 (2): 243–68.
24.
SchurmanRachelMunroWilliam A.. 2013. Fighting for the Future of Food: Activists versus Agribusiness in the Struggle over Biotechnology. Vol. 35. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.
25.
Schwarz-PlaschgClaudia. 2018. “Nanotechnology Is Like…The Rhetorical Roles of Analogies in Public Engagement.” Public Understanding of Science27 (2): 153–67.
26.
SelfaTheresaLindbergSonjaBainCarmen. 2021. “Governing Gene Editing in Agriculture and Food in the United States: Tensions, Contestations, and Realignments.” Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene9 (1): 00153.
27.
YamaguchiTomiko. 2020. “Performativity of Expectations: The Emergence of Plant Gene Editing Technologies in Japan.” Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene8 (1).
