We present a developmental perspective regarding the difference in perceptions toward privacy between young and old. Here, we introduce the notion of privacy conceptions, that is, the specific ideas that individuals have regarding what privacy actually is. The differences in privacy concerns often found between young and old are postulated as the result of the differences found in their privacy conceptions, which are subsequently linked to their developmental life stages. The data presented have been obtained through a questionnaire distributed among adolescents, young adults, and adults and provide support for this developmental perspective. This study is one of the first to include adolescents when investigating the privacy concerns among young and old. The results show that the privacy conceptions held by adolescents indeed differ from those held by young adults and adults in keeping with the expectations as seen from a developmental perspective. In addition, the areas in which the differences in privacy conceptions are found also reflect the strongest relationship with concerns. As such, these findings present an alternative perspective to the commonly held notion that young people are less concerned about privacy.
AcquistiA.GrossR.. 2006. “Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook.” 6th Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Cambridge, UK.
2.
AndrewsL.2012. “Facebook Is Using You.” The New York Times. Accessed July 5, 2012. http://www.nytimes.com.
3.
ArnettJ. J.2000. “Emerging Adulthood: A Theory of Development from the Late Teens through Twenties.” American Psychologist55 (5): 469–80.
4.
BliesznerR.RobertoK. A.. 2004. “Friendship across the Life Span: Reciprocity in Individual and Relationship Development.” In Growing Together: Personal Relationships across the Lifespan, edited by LangF. R.FingermanK. L., 159–82. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BonevaB. S.QuinnA.KrautR. E.KieslerS.ShklovskiI.. 2006. “Teenage Communication in the Instant Messaging Era.” In Computers, Phones, and the Internet: Domesticating Information Technology, edited by KrautR.BryninM.KieslerS., 201–18. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
BoydD. M. 2008. “Taken out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics Publics.” Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. Accessed July 13, 2010. http://www.danah.org/papers/TakenOutOfContext.pdf.
7.
BoydD. M.MarwickA. E.. 2011. “Social Privacy in Networked Publics: Teens’ Attitudes, Practices, and Strategies.” A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society. Accessed November 18, 2011. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1925128.
8.
BukatkoD.2008. Child and Adolescent Development. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
9.
BurgoonJ. K.1982. “Privacy and Communication.” In Communication Yearbook6, edited by BurgoonM., 206–88. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
BurgoonJ. K.ParrottR.Le PoireB. A.KelleyD. L.WaltherJ. B.PerryD.. 1989. “Maintaining and Restoring Privacy through Communication in Different Types of Relationships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships6 (2): 131–58.
11.
ChristofidesE.MuiseA.DesmaraisS.. 2012. “Hey Mom, What’s on Your Facebook? Comparing Facebook Disclosure and Privacy in Adolescents and Adults.” Social Psychological and Personality Science3 (1): 48–54.
DebatinB.LovejoyJ. P.HornA.HughesB. N.. 2009. “Facebook and Online Privacy: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Unintended Consequences.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication15 (1): 83–108.
14.
EaglyA. H.MladinicA.OttoS.. 1994. “Cognitive and Affective Bases of Attitudes Toward Social Groups and Social Policies.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology30 (2): 113–37.
15.
EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC.LampeC.. 2007. “The Benefits of Facebook “Friends”: Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12 (4): 1143–68.
HartupW. W.StevensN.. 1999. “Friendships and Adaptation across the Life Span.” Current Directions in Psychological Science8 (3): 76–79.
23.
HerringS. C.2008. “Questioning the Generational Divide: Technological Exoticism and Adult Constructions of Online Youth Identity.” In Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, edited by BuckinghamD., 71–94. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
HoofnagleC.KingJ.LiS.TurowT.. 2010. “How Different Are Young Adults from Older Adults When It Comes to Information Privacy Attitudes & Policies?” Accessed July 5, 2011. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1589864.
25.
JohnsonJ. L.1989. “Privacy and the Judgements of Others.” The Journal of Value Inquiry23 (2): 157–68.
26.
KaplanM. F.1991. “The Joint Effects of Cognition and Affect on Social Judgement.” In Emotion and Social Judgements, edited by ForgasJ. P., 73–82. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
27.
LampeC.EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC.. 2006. “A Face(book) in the Crowd: Social Searching vs. Social Browsing.” In Proceedings of CSCW-2006, 161–70. New York: ACM Press.
LivingstoneS. 2008. “Taking Risky Opportunities in Youthful Content Creation: Teenagers’ Use of Social Networking Sites for Intimacy, Privacy and Self-expression.” New Media & Society10 (3): 393–411.
31.
MaddenM.SmithA.. 2010. Reputation Management and Social Media: How People Monitor their Identity and Search for Others Online. Pew Internet & American Life Project report. Accessed September 15, 2011. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Reputation-Management.aspx.
MarwickA. E.DiazD. M.PalfreyJ.. 2010. “Youth, Privacy and Reputation. Literature Review.” Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2010-2015, Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 2010-2029. Accessed April 3, 2013. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1588163.
34.
MeschG. S.TalmudI.. 2010. Wired Youth. The Social World of Adolescence in the Informational Age. New York: Routledge.
35.
NissenbaumH. F.2010. Privacy in Context. Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36.
NodaT. S.2009. “Facebook Still a Hotbed of Identity Theft, Study Claims.” PCWorld. Accessed July 5, 2012. http://www.pcworld.com.
37.
NussbaumE.2007. “The Kids, the Internet, and the End of Privacy: The Greatest Generation Gap Since Rock and Roll.” New York. Accessed November 14, 2011. http://nymag.com/news/features/27341/.
PaineC.ReipsU.-D.StiegerS.JoinsonA.BuchananT.. 2007. “Internet Users’ Perceptions of ‘Privacy Concerns’ and ‘Privacy Actions’.” Human-Computer Studies65 (6): 526–36.
40.
PalfreyJ.GasserU.. 2008. Born Digital. New York: Basic Books.
41.
ParentW. A.1983. “Recent Work on the Concept of Privacy.” American Philosophical Quarterly20 (4): 341–55.
42.
PeterJ.ValkenburgP.. 2011. “Adolescents’ Online Privacy: Toward a Developmental Perspective.” In Privacy Online, edited by TrepteS.ReineckeL., 221–34. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
43.
ProsserW. L.1960. “Privacy.” California Law Review48 (3): 383–423.
44.
SteijnW. M. P.2014. “A Developmental Perspective Regarding the Behaviour of Adolescents, Young Adults, and Adults on Social Network Sites.” Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace8 (2), article 1, doi: 10.5817/CP2014-2-5.
TimmerJ.2009. “New Algorithm Guesses SSNs Using Date and Place of Birth.” Arstechnica. Accessed July 5, 2012. http://arstechnica.com.
47.
TufekciZ.2012. “Facebook, Youth and Privacy in Networked Publics.” In Proceedings of the Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 338–45. Palo Alto, California: The AAI Press.
48.
ValkenburgP. M.SchoutenA. P.PeterJ.. 2005. “Adolescents’ Identity Experiments on the Internet.” New Media & Society7 (3): 383–402.
49.
van de Garde-PerikE.MarkopoulosP.de RuyterB.EggenB.IJsselsteinW.. 2008. “Investigating Privacy Attitudes and Behavior in Relation to Personalization.” Social Science Computer Review26 (1): 20–43.
50.
VedderA.2001. “KDD, Privacy, Individuality and Fairness.” In Readings in Cyberethics, edited by SpinelloR.TavaniH., 404–12. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
51.
VedderA.2011. “Privacy 3.0.” In Innovating Government, edited by van der HofS.GroothuisM. M., 17–28. New York: Springer/Asser Press.
52.
WarrenS. D.BrandeisL. D.. 1890. “The Right to Privacy. The Implicit Made Explicit.” In Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology, edited by SchoemanF. D., 75–103. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53.
WestinA. F.2003. “Social and Political Dimensions of Privacy.” Journal of Social Issues59 (2): 1–37.
54.
WolakJ.MitchellK. J.FinkelhorD.. 2002. “Close Online Relationships in a National Sample of Adolescents.” Adolescence37 (147): 441–56.
55.
ZukowskiT.BrownI.. 2007. “Examining the Influence of Demographic Factors on Internet Users’ Information Privacy Concerns.” In Proceedings of SAICSIT Conference, 197–204. New York: ACM.
