Much has been made of the importance of training ethical, socially conscious engineers, but does US engineering education actually encourage neophytes to take seriously their professional responsibility to public welfare? Counter to such ideals of engagement, I argue that students’ interest in public welfare concerns may actually decline over the course of their engineering education. Using unique longitudinal survey data of students at four colleges, this article examines (a) how students’ public welfare beliefs change during their engineering education, (b) whether engineering programs emphasize engagement, and (c) whether these program emphases are related to students’ public welfare beliefs. I track four specific public welfare considerations: the importance to students of professional/ethical responsibilities, understanding the consequences of technology, understanding how people use machines, and social consciousness. Suggesting a culture of disengagement, I find that the cultural emphases of students’ engineering programs are directly related to their public welfare commitments and students’ public welfare concerns decline significantly over the course of their engineering education. However, these findings also suggest that if engineering programs can dismantle the ideological pillars of disengagement in their local climates, they may foster more engaged engineers.
BeckUlrich. 1992. The Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. London, England: Sage.
4.
BeckerHoward S.GeerBlancheHughesEverettStraussAnselm. 1961. Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BucciarelliLouis L.1994. Designing Engineers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
6.
CatalanoGeorge D.2011. Tragedy in the Gulf: A Call for a New Engineering Ethic. New York: Morgan and Claypool.
7.
CechErin A.2012. “Great Problems of Grand Challenges: Problematizing Engineering’s Understanding of Its Role in Society.”International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice and Peace1 (2): 85–94.
8.
CechErin A.2013a. “The (Mis)Framing of Social Justice: Why Meritocracy and Depoliticization Hinder Engineers’ Ability to Think About Social Injustices.” In Engineering Education for Social Justice: Critical Explorations and Opportunities, edited by LucenaJuan, 67–84. New York: Springer.
9.
CechErin A.2013b. “Engineers & Engineeresses? Self-conceptions and the Gendered Development of Professional Identities.” Working Paper. Houston, TX: Rice University.
10.
CechErinRubineauBrianSilbeySusanSeronCarroll. 2011. “Professional Role Confidence and Gendered Persistence in Engineering.”American Sociological Review76 (5): 641–66.
11.
CechErin A.WaidzunasTom J.. 2011. “Navigating the Heteronormativity of Engineering: The Experiences of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Students.”Engineering Studies3 (1): 1–24.
12.
CostelloCarrie Yang. 2005. Professional Identity Crisis: Race, Class, Gender and Success at Professional Schools. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
13.
DiMaggioPaulP. PowellWalter. 1983. “Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.”American Sociological Review 48: 168–60.
14.
DoornNeelke. 2011. “Exploring Responsibility Rationales in Research and Development (R&D).”Science, Technology, & Human Values37 (3): 180–209.
15.
DowneyGary L.LucenaJuan C.. 2004. “Knowledge and Professional Identity in Engineering: Code-switching and the Metrics of Progress.”History and Technology20 (4): 393–420.
16.
EpsteinSteven. 2006. “Institutionalizing the New Politics of Difference in U.S. Biomedical Research.” In The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks and Power, edited by FrickelS.MooreK., 325–50. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
17.
FaulknerWendy. 2007. “Nuts and Bolts and People: Gender Troubled Engineering Identities.”Social Studies of Science37 (3): 331–56.
18.
FreidsonEliot. 1973. The Professions and their prospectsBeverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
GordonDavid. 1982. “The Concept of the Hidden Curriculum.”Journal of Philosophy of Education16 (2): 187–98.
20.
GravanderJerry W.1980. “The Origin and Implications of Engineers’ Obligations to the Public Welfare.”PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 443–55. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
HaasJackShaffirWilliam1987. Becoming Doctors: The Adoption of a Cloak of CompetenceGreenwich, CN: JAI Press.
22.
HughesThomas P.2005. American Genesis: A Century of Invention and Technological Enthusiasm, 1870-1970. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
23.
HuntMatthew O.2007. “African-American, Hispanic and White Beliefs about Black/White Inequality, 1977-2004.”American Journal of Sociology72 (3): 390–415.
24.
JasanoffShelia. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
KaneEmily W.1995. “Education and Beliefs about Gender Inequality.”Social Problems42 (1): 74–90.
26.
Knorr CetinaKarin1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
LarsonMagali S.1977. The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
LaytonEdwin T., Jr. 1971. The Revolt of the Engineers: Social Responsibility and the American Engineering Profession. Cleveland, England: Western Reserve Press.
29.
LynchWilliam T.KlineRonald. 2000. “Engineering Practice and Engineering Ethics.”Science, Technology, & Human Values25 (2): 195–225.
30.
McCallLeslie. 2013. The Undeserving Rich: American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
MehalikMatthew M.GormanMichael E.. 2006. “A Framework for Strategic Network Design Assessment, Decision Making and Moral Imagination.”Science, Technology, & Human Values31 (3): 289–308.
32.
National Academy of Engineering. 2004. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
NieusmaDean. 2011. “Engineering, Social Justice and Peace: Strategies for Pedagogical, Curricular and Institutional Reform.” Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education. Vancouver, BC.
35.
NyeDavid E.1994. American Technological Sublime. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
36.
NyeDavid E.2006. Technology Matters: Questions to Live With. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
37.
RobinsonC.SchumacherR. E.. 2009. “Interaction Effects: Centering, Variance Inflation Factor, and Interpretation Issues.”Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints35 (1): 6–11.
38.
SchleefDebra J.2006. Managing Elites: Professional Socialization in Law and Business Schools. Oxford, England: Rowan & Littlefield.
39.
SchneiderJen. 2010. “Engineering and the Values of Social Justice.”Engineering Studies2 (1): 1–4.
40.
SeronCarrollSilbeySusan S.. 2009. “The Dialectic between Expert Knowledge and Professional Discretion: Accreditation, Social Control and the Limits of Instrumental Logic.”Engineering Studies1 (2): 101–27.
41.
SwierstraTsjallingJelsmaJaap. 2006. “Responsibility without Moralism in Technoscientific Design Practice.”Science, Technology, & Human Values31 (3): 309–32.
42.
TraweekSharon. 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High-energy Physics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
van de PoelIboVerbeekPeter-Paul. 2006. “Ethics and Engineering Design. Science, Technology, & Human Values31 (3): 223–36.
44.
VerbeekPeter-Paul. 2006. “Materializing Morality: Design Ethics and Technological Mediation.”Science, Technology, & Human Values31 (3): 361–80.
45.
WinnerLangdon. 1977. Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46.
WynneBrian. 1992. “Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science.”Public Understandings of Science1:281–304.
47.
XieYoShaumanKimberlee. 2003. Women in Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
YoungMichael. 1994. The Rise of Meritocracy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
49.
ZimmermanAndrew D.1995. “Toward a More Democratic Ethic of Technological Governance.”Science, Technology, & Human Values20 (1): 86–107.
