This essay presents the first analysis of gender differences in productivity using panel data on scientists in low-income countries. About 540 researchers in Ghana, Kenya, and Kerala (India) were studied using the same survey instrument in 2001 and 2005. Results indicate very few gender disparities in outcomes at either period of the study with one exception: productivity in international journals. The authors show that substantial gains in access to technology and higher education by women have not reduced the gender gap on this important career dimension.
AllisonPaul D. 2005. Fixed effects regression models for longitudinal data using SAS. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute Inc.
2.
AllisonPaul D.LongJ. Scott1990. Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review55:469–78.
3.
AllisonPaul D.LongJ. ScottKrauzeTad K. 1982. Cumulative advantage and inequality in science. American Sociological Review47:615–25.
4.
AndersonMeredith. 2007. Who has the internet empowered? Rethinking the relationship between women and ICTs in the developing world. In Information Society and Development: The Kerala Experience, ed. PalackalA.ShrumWesley, 173–99. New Delhi: Rawat Publications.
5.
AndersonMeredithShrumWesley. 2007. Circumvention and social change: ICTs and the discourse of empowerment. Women’s Studies in Communication30:229–53.
6.
ArunachalamSubbiah. 2003. Information for research in developing countries: Information technology, a friend or foe?International Information and Library Review35:133–47.
7.
AstinHelenMilemJeffrey. 1997. The status of academic couples in U.S. institutions. In Academic couples: Problems and promises, ed. FerberM. A.LoebJ. W., 128–55. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
8.
BarberLeslie A. 1995. U.S. women in science and engineering, 1960-1990: Progress toward equity?The Journal of Higher Education66:213–34.
9.
BarjakFranz. 2004. On the integration of the internet into informal science communication. Solothurn University of Applied Sciences, Series A: Discussion Paper 2004-W02.
10.
BarjakFranz. 2006. Research productivity in the internet era. Scientometrics68:343–60.
11.
BeintemaNienke M.Di MarcantonioFederica. 2009. Women’s participation in agricultural research and higher education: Key trends in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: IFPRI and Nairobi: G&D Program.
12.
BurrelliJoan. 2008. Thirty-three years of women in S&E faculty positions. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences.
13.
CampionPatriciaShrumWesley. 2004. Gender and science in development: Women scientists in Africa and India. Science Technology and Human Values29:459–85.
14.
ChakravarthyR. 1986. Productivity of Indian women scientists. Productivity3:259–69.
15.
ClewellBeatriz ChuCampbellPatricia B. 2002. Taking stock: Where we’ve been, where we are, where we’re going. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering8:255–84.
16.
ColeJonathan R.ZuckermanHarriet. 1984. The productivity puzzle. In Advances in motivation and achievement ed. MaehrP.SteinKampM. W., 217–58. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
17.
ColeJonathan R.ZuckermanHarriet. 1987. Marriage, motherhood, and research performance in science. Scientific American256:119–25.
18.
CostaSely M. S.MeadowsJack. 2000. The impact of computer usage on scholarly communication among social scientists. Journal of Information Science26:255–62.
19.
CrenshawEdward. 1991. Foreign investment as a dependent variable: Determinants of foreign investment and capital penetration in developing nations. Social Forces69:1169–82.
20.
DroriGili S.MeyerJohn W.RamirezFrancisco O.SchoferEvan. 2003. Science in the modern world polity: Institutionalization and globalization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
EhikhamenorFabian A. 2002. Internet resources and productivity in scientific research in Nigerian Universities. Journal of Information Science29:107–16.
22.
EshiwaniGeorge S. 1999. Higher education in Africa: Challenges and strategies for the 21st century. In Higher education in the twenty-first century: Global challenge and national response, ed. AltbachPhilip G.PetersonPatti McGill, 31–39. AnnapolisJunction, MD: IIE Books.
23.
FinkelSteven E. 1995. Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
FoxMary Frank. 1991. Gender, environmental milieu, and productivity in science. In The outer circle: Women in the scientific community, ed. ZuckermanH.ColeJ. R.BruerJ. T., 188–204. New York: Norton.
25.
FoxMary Frank. 1995. Women and scientific careers. In The handbook of science and technology studies, ed. Sheila JasanoffG. M.PetersonJamesPitchTrevor, 205–23. NewburyPark: Sage.
26.
FoxMary Frank. 1996. Women, academia, and careers in science. In The equity equation: Fostering the advancement of women in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering, ed. DavisC. S.GinorioA. B.HollensheadC. S.LazarusB. B.RaymanP. M., and associates, 265–69. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
FoxMary Frank. 1999. Gender, hierarchy, and science. In Handbook of sociology of gender, ed. ChafetzJ. S., 441–57. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
28.
FoxMary Frank. 2005. Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science35:131–50.
29.
FoxMary Frank. 2010. Women and men faculty in academic science and engineering: Social organizational indicators and implications. American Behavioral Scientist53:997–1012.
30.
FoxMary FrankMohapatraSushanta. 2007. Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral granting departments. The Journal of Higher Education78:542–71.
31.
FrankeRichard W.ChasinBarbara H. 1994. Kerala: Radical reform as development in an Indian state. Oakland, CA: Food First.
32.
GuptaNamrataSharmaArun K. 2002. Women academic scientists in India. Social Studies of Science32:901–15.
33.
GuptaNamrataSharmaArun K. 2003. Gender inequality in the work environment at institutes of higher learning in science and technology in India. Work Employment and Society17:597–616.
34.
HollandDana G. 2009. Between the practical and the academic: The relation of mode 1 and mode 2 knowledge production in a developing country. Science, Technology, & Human Values34:551–72.
35.
JamesJeffreyVersteegMila. 2007. Mobile phones in Africa: How much do we really know?Social Indicators Research84:117–26.
36.
JohnsonDavid R. 1995. Alternative methods for the quantitative analysis of panel data in family research: Pooled time-series models. Journal of Marriage and theFamily57:1065–77.
37.
KokuEmmanuelNazerNancyWellmanBarry. 2001. Netting scholars: Online and offline. American Behavioral Scientist44:1750–72.
38.
KumarNeelam. 2001. Gender and stratification in science: An empirical study in the Indian setting. Indian Journal of Gender Studies8:51–67.
39.
KyvikSveinTeigenMari. 1996. Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science, Technology, & Human Values21:54–71.
40.
LeaheyErin. 2006. Gender differences in productivity: Research specialization as a missing link. Gender and Society20:754–80.
41.
LongJ. Scott. 1978. Productivity and academic position in the scientific career. American Sociological Review43:889–908.
42.
LongJ. Scott. 1990. The origins of sex differences in science. Social Forces68:1297–316.
43.
LongJ. Scott. 1992. Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces71:159–78.
44.
LongJ. ScottFoxMary Frank. 1995. Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology21:45–71.
45.
LysonThomas A.TorresRobert J.WelshRick. 2001. Scale of agricultural production, civic engagement, and community welfare. Social Forces80: 311–27.
46.
MahlckPaula. 2001. Mapping gender differences in scientific careers in social and bibliometric space. Science, Technology, & Human Values26:167–90.
47.
MatzatUwe. 2004. Academic communication and internet discussion groups: Transfer of information or creation of social contacts?Social Networks26:221–55.
48.
MillerB. PaigeSooryamoorthyR.AndersonMeredithPalackalAntonyShrumWesley. 2006. Gender and science in developing areas: Has the internet reduced inequality. Social Science Quarterly87:679–89.
49.
NajmanJake M.HewittBelinda. 2003. The validity of publication and citation counts for sociology and other selected disciplines. Journal of Sociology39: 62–81.
50.
NakhaieM. Reza. 2002. Gender differences in publication among university professors in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology39: 151–80.
51.
NentwichMichael. 2005. Cyberscience: Modelling ICT-induced changes of the scholarly communication system. Information, Communication and Society8:542.
52.
PalackalAntonyAndersonMeredithPaige MillerB.ShrumWesley. 2006. Gender stratification and E-science: Can the internet circumvent patrifocality? In New infrastructures of knowledge production: Understanding E-science, ed. HineChrstine M., 246–69. London: Idea Group Publishing.
53.
ReskinBarbara F. 1977. Scientific productivity and the reward structure of science. American Sociological Review42:491–504.
ScholteJan Aart. 2000. Globalization: A critical introduction. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
56.
ShrumWesley. 1997. View from afar: ‘Visible’ productivity of scientists in the developing world. Scientometrics40:215–235.
57.
ShrumWesley. 2005. Reagency of the internet, or, “How I Became a Guest for Science.”Social Studies of Science35(5):723–754.
58.
ShrumWesleyRamanathaiyerSundar. 2000. Knowledge, democratization, and sustainability: The Kerala ‘Model’ of scientific capacity building. In Kerala: The development experience. Reflections on sustainability and replicability, ed. ParayilG., 157–77. London: Zed Books.
SonnertGerhardFoxMary FrankAdkinsKristen. 2007. Undergraduate women in science and engineering: Effects of faculty, fields, and institutions over time. Social Science Quarterly88:1333–56.
61.
StadsGert-JanBeintemaNienke M. 2006. Women scientists in Sub-Saharan agricultural R&D. Agricultural science and technology indicators. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute and Inter-American Development Bank.
62.
SubrahmanyanL. 1998. Women scientists in the third world: The Indian experience. New Delhi: Sage.
63.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Information Economy Report. 2007. Science and technology for development: The new paradigm of ICT. New York: United Nations Publications.
64.
VasileiadouEleftheriaVliegenthartRens. 2009. Research productivity in the era of the internet revisited. Research Policy38:1260–68.
65.
WalshJohn P.KuckerStephanieMaloneyNancy G.GabbayShaul. 2000. Connecting minds: Computer mediated communication and scientific work. Journal of the American Society for Information Science51:1295–305.
66.
WellmanBarryKokuEmmanuelHunsingerJeremy. 2006. Networked scholarship. The International Handbook of Virtual Learning EnvironmentsPart IV:1429–47.
67.
XieYuShaumanKimberlee. 1998. Sex difference in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review63:847–70.
68.
XieYuShaumanKimberlee. 2003. Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69.
YnalvezMarcusDuqueRicardo B.MbatiaPaulSooryamoorthyR.PalackalAntonyShrumWesley. 2005. When do scientists adopt the internet? Dimensions of connectivity in developing areas. Scientometrics63:39–67.
70.
ZimmermanEricBar-IlanJudit. 2008. PIM @ academia: How e-mail is used by scholars. Online Information Review33:22–42.
71.
ZuckermanHarrietColeJonathan R. 1975. Women in American science. Minerva13:82–102.
