How do technologies such as webcams influence health care and what concepts may describe this? This article explores the literature and analyses what people looking through webcams do within a particular health care practice in the Netherlands, that is, within the rehabilitation of people suffering from severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma. Several ways to describe the activities webcams support and perform are identified. The webcam is (1) concentrating the activities of its users, by making them focus on the task at hand and (2) magnifies the characteristics of the already existing relationships between webcam users by imposing a relational distance that fits best with intimate contacts. (3) Although webcams shift notions of space and distance, their working appears to be related, to a great extent, to their location.
Akrich, M.1992. The de-scription of technical objects. In Shaping technology/ building society. Studies in sociotechnical change, ed. W. E. Bijker and J. Law, 205-24. Cambridge, London: MIT Press.
Bauer, K.2004. Cyber medicine and the moral integrity of the physician-patient relationship. Ethics and Information Technology6:83-91.
4.
Cukor, P., and L. Baer.1994. Human factors issues in telemedicine: a practical guide with particular attention to psychiatry. Telemedicine Today 1994; 29:16-18.
5.
Currell, R., C. Urquhart, P. Wainwright, and R. Lewis.2000. Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews2000: CD002098.
6.
Fischer, C.S.1992. America calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Foucault, M.1971. L’ordre du Discourse. Paris: Gallimard.
8.
Gammon, D., T. Sörlie, S. Bergvik, and T. Sörensen Höifödt.1998. Psychotherapy supervision conducted via videoconferencing: A qualitative study of users’ experiences. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry52:411-21.
9.
Haraway, D.1991. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In Simians, cyborgs and women. The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
10.
Ihde, D.1990. Technology and the lifeworld. Bloomington, MN: Indiana University Press.
11.
Johnson, K.2006. TV screen, not couch, is required for this session. New York Times, June, 8.
12.
Knudsen, C.2002.Video mediated communication: Producing a sense of presence between individuals in shared virtual reality. In: Educational conferencing: Video and text traditions. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Educational Conferencing, ed. J. Baggaley, P. Fahy, and C. O’Hagan.Banff: Alberta. Available at http://cde.athabascau.ca/ISEC2002/
13.
Law, J.1999. After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In Actor network theory and after, ed. J. Law and J. Hassard.Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
14.
Law, J.2004. After method: Mess in social science research. Durham, London: Duke University Press.
15.
Law, J., and A. Mol.2008. The Actor-Enacted: Cumbrian Sheep in 2001. In Material agency: Towards a non-anthropocentric approach , ed. C. Knappet and L. Malafouris, 57-78. New York: Springer.
16.
Law, J., and J. Hassard (eds). 1999. Actor network theory and after . Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
17.
Lie, M., and K.H. Sörensen .1996. Making technology our own? Domesticating technology into everyday life. Oslo: Scandianavian University Press.
18.
Mol, A.2002. The body multiple. Ontology in medical practice. Durham, London: Duke University Press.
19.
Moreira, T.2006. Heterogeneity and coordination of blood pressure in neurosurgery . Social Studies of Science36:69-97.
20.
Mort, M., C. May, and T. Williams.2003. Remote doctors and absent patients: Acting at a distance in telemedicine? Science, Technology, & Human Values28:274-95.
21.
Norman, S.2006. The use of telemedicine in psychiatry. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing13:771-7.
22.
Onor, M.L., and S. Misan.2005. The clinical interview and the doctor-patient relationship in telemedicine. Telemedicine and E-Health11:102-5.
23.
Pols, J., and I. Moser.2009. Cold technologies versus warm care? On affective and social relations with care technologies. ALTER-European Journal of Disability Research3:159-78.
24.
Sävenstedt, S., K. Zingmark, and P.O. Sandman.2004. Being present in a distant room: Aspects of teleconsultations with older people in a nursing home. Qualitative Health Research14:1046-1057.
25.
Sävenstedt, S., K. Zingmark, L.C. Hydén, and C. Brulin.2005. Establishing joint attention in remote talks with the elderly about health: A study of nurses’ conversation with elderly persons in teleconsultations. Scandinavian Journal of the Caring Sciences19:317-24.
26.
Verbeek, P.P.2006. Materializing morality. Design ethics an technological mediation. Science, Technology, & Human Values31:361-80.
27.
Wakefield, B.J., J.E. Holaman, A. Ray, J. Morse, and M.G. Kienzle.2004. Nurse and patient communication via low and high-bandwidth home telecare systems. Journal of telemedicine and Telecare10:156-9.
28.
Whitten, P., B. Collins, and F. Mair.1998. Nurse and patient reactions to a developmental home telecare system. Journal for Telemedicine and Telecare4:152-160.
29.
Willems, D.1995. Tools of care? Explorations into the semiotics of medical technology. PhD diss., Maastricht University.
