‘‘Undone science’’ refers to areas of research that are left unfunded, incomplete, or generally ignored but that social movements or civil society organizations often identify as worthy of more research. This study mobilizes four recent studies to further elaborate the concept of undone science as it relates to the political construction of research agendas. Using these cases, we develop the argument that undone science is part of a broader politics of knowledge, wherein multiple and competing groups struggle over the construction and implementation of alternative research agendas. Overall, the study demonstrates the analytic potential of the concept of undone science to deepen understanding of the systematic nonproduction of knowledge in the institutional matrix of state, industry, and social movements that is characteristic of recent calls for a ‘‘new political sociology of science.’’
Allen, B.L.2003. Uneasy alchemy: Citizens and experts in Louisiana’s chemical corridor disputes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
Amato, I.1993. The crusade against chlorine. Science261 (5118):152-4.
3.
Anglin, M.K.1997. Working from the inside out: Implications of breast cancer activism for bio-medical policies and practices. Social Science and Medicine44 (9):1043-415.
4.
Austoker, J.1988. A history of the Imperial Cancer Research Fund 1902-1986 . New York: Oxford University Press .
5.
Beck, U.1995. Ecological politics in an age of risk. Trans. A. Weisz. Cambridge: Polity.
6.
Botts, L., P. Muldoon, P. Botts, and K. von Moltke.2001. The Great Lakes water quality agreement . In Knowledge, power, and participation in environmental policy analysis, ed. M. Hisschemöller, R. Hoppe, W. Dunn , and J. Ravetz, 121-43. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
7.
Bourdieu, P.2004. Science of science and reflexivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Brown, P., S. McCormick, B. Mayer, S. Zavestoski, R. Morello-Frosch, R. Gasior Altman, and L. Senier.2006. ‘‘A lab of our own’’: Environmental causation of breast cancer and challenges to the dominant epidemiological paradigm. Science, Technology and Human Values31 (5):499-536.
9.
Chlorine Chemistry Council (n.d.). Pandora’s poison: Putting political ideologies ahead of public health-and hope. http://www.pandoraspoison.org/industry_views/ccc_statement.html (accessed November 11, 2000).
10.
Collins, H.1985. Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
11.
Collins, H.2002. The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science32 (2):235-96.
12.
Di Chiro, G.2008. Living environmentalisms: Coalition politics, social reproduction, and environmental justice. Environmental Politics17 (2):276-98.
13.
Epstein, S.2007. Patient groups and health movements. In New handbook of science and technology studies, ed. E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wacjman , 499-539. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
Forman, P.1987. Behind quantum electronics: National security as basis for physical research in the United States, 1940-1960. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences18 (1):149-229.
15.
Forsythe, D.2001. Studying those who study us: An anthropologist in the world of artificial intelligence. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
Fosket, J.2004. Constructing ‘high risk women’: the development and standardization of a breast cancer risk assessment tool. Science, Technology & Human Values29 (3):291-313.
17.
Frickel, S.2008. On missing New Orleans: Lost knowledge and knowledge gaps in an urban hazardscape. Environmental History13 (4):634-50.
18.
Frickel, S., and K. Moore , eds. 2006a. The new political sociology of science: Institutions, networks, and power. Madison, WI : University of Wisconsin Press.
19.
Frickel, S., and K. Moore.2006b. Prospects and challenges for a new political sociology of science. In The new political sociology of science: Institutions, networks, and power, ed. S. Frickel, and K. Moore, 3-31. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
20.
Frickel, S., and M.B. Vincent.2007. Katrina, contamination, and the unintended organization of ignorance. Technology in Society29:181-8.
21.
Fujimura, J.1996. Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects, and ‘translation.’ In Science as practice and culture , ed. A. Pickering, 168-211. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
Gibbon, S.2007. Breast cancer genes and the gendering of knowledge: Science and citizenship in the cultural context of the ‘new’genetics.’Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan .
24.
Gibbon, S., and C. Novas , eds. 2007. Bio-socialities, genetics and the social sciences. London: Routledge .
25.
Gross, M.2007. The unknown in process: Dynamic connections of ignorance, non-knowledge, and related concepts. Current Sociology55:742-59.
26.
Gross, M. in press. Ignorance and surprise: Science, society, and ecological design . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
Haraway, D.J.1989. Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. New York: Routledge .
28.
Harding, S.1998. Is science multicultural? Postcolonialisms, feminisms, epistemologies. Blooomington, INIndiana University Press .
29.
Hess, D.2007. Alternative pathways in science and industry: Activism, innovation, and the environment in an era of globalization. Cambridge: MIT Press.
30.
Hilgartner, S.2001. Election 2000 and the production of the unknowable. Social Studies of Science31 (3):439-41.
31.
Hoffmann-Riem, H., and B. Wynne.2002. In risk assessment, one has to admit ignorance. Nature416 (March):123.
32.
Holton, G., and R. S. Morrison , eds. 1979. Limits of scientific inquiry. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
33.
Howard, J.2004. Toward intelligent, democratic steering of chemical technologies: Evaluating industrial chlorine chemistry as environmental trial and error . PhD Diss., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY. Proquest no. 845710461.
34.
International Joint Commission (IJC).1992 . Sixth biennial report on Great Lakes water quality. Washington, DC: IJC.
35.
Jasper, J.M., and D. Nelkin.1992. The animal rights crusade: The growth of a moral protest. New York: Free Press.
36.
Kaufert, P.1998. Women, resistance and the breast cancer movement. In Pragmatic women and body politics, ed. M. Lock and P. Kaufert, 287-309. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
37.
Kempner, J., C.L. Bosk, and J.F. Merz.2008. Forbidden knowledge: The phenomenology of scientific inaction. Unpublished manuscript.
38.
Kempner, J., C.S. Perlis, and J.F. Merz.2005. Forbidden knowledge. Science307:854.
39.
Klawiter, M.2004. Breast cancer in two regimes: the impact of social movements on illness experience. Sociology of Health and Illness26 (6):845-74.
40.
Klein, H.K., and D.L. Kleinman.2002. The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science, Technology, and Human Values27 (1): 28-52.
41.
Kleinman, D.L., and S.P. Vallas.2001. Science, capitalism, and the rise of the ‘knowledge worker’: The changing structure of knowledge production in the United States. Theory and Society30:451-92.
42.
Knorr-Cetina, K.1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
Kohler, R.E.1994. Lords of the fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
Lerner, B.2003. The breast cancer wars. Hope, fear and pursuit of a cure in twentieth Century-America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
Levidow, Les.2002. Ignorance-based risk assessment? Scientific controversy over GM food safety. Science as Culture11 (1):61-7.
46.
Louisiana Bucket Brigade.2001. Land sharks: Orion Refining’s predatory property purchases. New Orleans: Inkworks Press.
47.
Löwy, I.1997. Between bench and bedside: Science, healing and interleukin-2 in a cancer ward. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
Lukes, S.2005. Power: A radical view. 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
49.
MacKenzie, D., and G. Spinardi.1995. Tacit knowledge, weapons design, and the uninvention of nuclear weapons. American Journal of Sociology101:44-99.
50.
Markowitz, G., and D. Rosner.2002. Deceit and denial: The deadly politics of industrial pollution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
51.
Martin, B.2007. Justice ignited: The dynamics of backfire. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
52.
Marx, K.1967. Capital, Volume 1. New York: International Publishers.
53.
Mayer, B., and C. Overdevest.2007. Bucket brigades and community-based environmental monitoring. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science, Montreal.
54.
Merton, R.1987. Three fragments from a sociologist’s notebook: Establishing the phenomenon, specified ignorance, and strategic research materials. Annual Review of Sociology13:1-28.
55.
Murphy, M.2006. Sick building syndrome and the problem of uncertainty: Environmental politics, technoscience, and women workers. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
56.
Noble, D.1977. America by design: Science, technology, and corporate capitalism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
57.
O’Rourke, D., and G.P. Macey.2003. Community environmental policing: Assessing new strategies of public participation in environmental regulation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management22 (3):383-414.
58.
Ottinger, G.2005. Grounds for action: Community and science in environmental controversy. PhD Diss., University of California, Berkeley.
59.
Potts, L.2004. An epidemiology of women’s lives: The environmental risk of breast cancer. Critical Public Health14 (2):133-47.
60.
Proctor, R.N.1995. Cancer wars: How politics shapes what we know and don’t know about cancer. New York: Basic Books.
61.
Proctor, R. N., and L. Schiebinger , eds. 2008. Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
62.
Rittel, H., and M. Webber.1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning . Policy Sciences4:155-69.
63.
Shattuck, R.1996. Forbidden knowledge. New York: Harcourt Brace and Company.
64.
Sheridan, J.1994. Chlorine chemistry: An endangered species? Industry Week , January3, 49-50.
65.
Shostak, S.2003. Locating gene-environment interaction: At the intersections of genetics and public health. Social Science and Medicine56:2327-42.
66.
Slaughter, S., and G. Rhoades.2004. Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, states, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
67.
Sontag, S.1988. Illness as Metaphor and AIDS and its Metaphors. New York: Doubleday.
68.
Star, S.L., and J.R. Griesemer.1989. Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and Boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science19:387-420.
69.
Strauss, A., and J. Corbin.1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
70.
Stringer, R., and P. Johnston.2001. Chlorine and the environment: An overview of the chlorine industry. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
71.
Swerczek, M.2000. Orion promises air samples. The Times Picayune, New Orleans . September29, B1-2.
72.
Tesh, S.N.2000. Uncertain hazards: Environmental activists and scientific proof. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
73.
Thompson, E.P.1971. The moral economy of the English crown in the eighteenth century. Past and Present50:76-136.
74.
Thornton, J.1991. The product is the poison: The case for a chlorine phase-out . Washington: Greenpeace USA.
75.
Thornton, J.2000. Pandora’s poison: Organochlorines and health. Cambridge: MIT.
76.
Tickner, J. A., ed. 2003. Precaution, environmental science, and preventive public policy. Washington, DC: Island.
77.
Woodhouse, E.J., D. Hess, S. Breyman, and B. Martin.2002. Science studies and activism: Possibilities and problems for reconstructivist agendas. Social Studies of Science32 (2):297-319.
78.
Zavestoski, S., P. Brown, M. Linder, S. McCormick, and B. Mayer.2002. Science, policy, activism, and war: Defining the health of Gulf War veterans. Science, Technology, & Human Values27 (2):171-205.
79.
Zavestoski, S., R. Morello-Frosch, P. Brown, B. Mayer, S. McCormick, and R. Gasior2004. Embodied health movements and challenges to the dominant epidemiological paradigm. Research in Social Movements, Conflict and Change25:253-278.
80.
Zuckerman, H.1978. Theory choice and problem choice in science. Sociological Inquiry48 (3-4):65-95.
