This article considers how the figure of the ``user'' is deployed to imagine the assembling of location-based mobile phone technologies in the context of UK policy. Drawing on the sociology of expectations, we address the performativity of the ``user'' in the think tank Demos' publication Mobilisation. In the process, we analyze how discourses about users enact particular futures that feature arrangements of, for example, persons, mobile phone technologies, and political institutions. We present two narrative strategies operating in Mobilisation: first, the purification of the social and technological in the portrayal of futures and their impediments; second, how existing, emergent, and future users serve as ``narrative joints'', reconnecting the social and technological in the enactment of preferred policy trajectories. In conclusion, we explore Mobilisation as a `catalogue of expectations' in which the representation of a multiplicity of users is itself performative, enacting a particular future policy terrain while bracketing off others.
Akrich, M.1992. The de-scription of technical objects. In Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, eds. W. Bijker and J. Law, 205-24. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
2.
--- . 1995. User representations: Practices, methods and sociology . In Managing technology in society: The approach of constructive technology assessment, eds. A. Rip, T. J. Misa, and J. Schot, 167-84. London and New York : Pinter Publishers.
3.
Bijker, W.E.1997. Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
4.
Binmore, K., and P. Klemperer.2002. The biggest auction ever: The sale of the British 3G telecom licences. Economic Journal112 (478): 74-96.
5.
Brown, N.2000. Organising/disorganising the breakthrough motif: Dolly the cloned ewe meets astrid the hybrid pig. In Contested futures: A sociology of prospective techno-science, eds. N. Brown, B. Rappert, and A. Webster, 87-108. Aldershot: Ashgate.
6.
--- . 2003. Hope against hype: Accountability in biopasts, presents and futures. Science Studies16 (2): 3-21.
7.
Brown, N., and M. Michael.2003. A sociology of expectations: Retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management15 (1): 3-18.
8.
Brown, N., B. Rappert, and A. Webster.2000a. Introducing contested futures. In Contested futures: A sociology of prospective techno-science, eds. Brown, N.,B. Rappert, and A. Webster, 3-20. Aldershot : Ashgate.
9.
--- . eds. 2000b. Contested futures: A sociology of prospective techno-science . Aldershot: Ashgate.
10.
Cooper, G., and J. Bowers.1995. Representing the user: Notes on the disciplinary rhetoric of human-computer interaction. In The social and interactional dimensions of human-computer interfaces, ed. P. J. Thomas, 48-66. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press .
11.
De Laat, B.2000. Scripts for the future: Using innovation studies to design foresight tools. In Contested futures: A sociology of prospective techno-science, eds. N. Brown, B. Rappert, and A. Webster , 175-208. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Denham, A., and M. Garnett.2004. A `hollowed-out' tradition? British think tanks in the twenty-first century. In Think tank traditions: Policy research and the politics of ideas, eds. D. Stone, and A. Denham, 232-46. Manchester : Manchester University Press.
14.
Desai, R.1994. Second-hand dealers in ideas: Think-tanks and Thatcherite hegemony. New Left Review1 (203): 27-64.
15.
Ehn, P.1988. Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Stockholm: Arbetslivscentrum.
16.
Gilbert, G.N., and M. Mulkay.1984. Opening pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Haddon, L., E. Mante, B. Sapio, K.-H. Kommonen, L. Fortunati, and A. Kant.2005. Everyday innovators: Researching the role of users in shaping ICT's, Computer supported cooperative work. Dordrecht: Springer.
18.
Harkin, J.2003. Mobilisation: The growing public interest in mobile technology . London: Demos.
19.
Kern, S.2003. The culture of time and space, 1880-1918. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
20.
Koselleck, R.2004. Futures past: On the semantics of historical time. New York: Columbia University Press.
21.
Latour, B.1992. Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, eds. E. Bijker Wiebe , and J. Law, 255-58. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
22.
--- . 1993. We have never been modern. Hemel Hempstead : Harvester Wheatsheaf.
23.
Mallard, A.2005. Following the emergence of unpredictable users: New stakes and tasks for a social scientific understanding of users. In Everyday innovators: Researching the role of users in shaping ICT's, eds. L. Haddon, E. Mante, B. Sapio, K.-H. Kommonen, L. Fortunati , and A. Kant, 39-53. Dordrecht : Springer.
24.
Mansell, R.E., and R. Silverstone.1996. Communication by design: The politics of communication technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
Michael, M.2000. Futures of the present: From performativity to prehension . In Contested futures: A sociology of prospective techno-science , eds. N. Brown, B. Rappert, and A. Webster , 21-39. Aldershot: Ashgate.
26.
--- . 2001. The invisible car: The cultural purification of road rage . In Car cultures, ed. D. Miller , 59-80. Oxford: Berg.
27.
---. 2006. Technoscience and everyday life. Maidenhead , Berkshire: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
28.
Nowotny, H.1994. Time: The modern and postmodern experience. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press;Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
29.
Oudshoorn, N., and T. J. Pinch, eds. 2003. How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies. Cambridge, MA : MIT.
30.
Pinch, T.J.2003. Giving birth to new users: How the Minimoog was sold to rock and roll. In How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies, eds. N. Oudshoorn , and T. J. Pinch, 67-80. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
31.
Potter, J., and M. Wetherell.1987. Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage Publications.
32.
Serres, M., and B. Latour.1995. Conversations on science, culture, and time. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
33.
Silverstone, R., E. Hirsch, and D. Morley.1994. Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household. In Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces, eds. R. Silverstone, and E. Hirsch, 15-31. London : Routledge.
34.
van Lente, H.1993. Promising technology: The dynamics of expectations in technological developments. PhD Thesis, University of Twente , Enschede.
35.
Woolgar, S.1991. Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. In Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination , ed. J. Law, 57-99. London : Routledge.
36.
Wyatt, S.2003. Non-users also matter: The construction of users and non-users of the internet. In How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies, eds. N. Oudshoorn , and T. J. Pinch.Cambridge, MA: MIT.
