The article reconsiders the nature and location of science in the development of genetic classification. Drawing on field studies of medical genetics, we explore how patient categorization is accomplished in between the clinic and laboratory. We focus on dysmorphology, a specialism concerned with complex syndromes that impair physical development. We show that dys-morphology is about more than fitting patients into prefixed diagnostic categories and that diagnostic process is marked by moments of uncertainty, ambiguity, and deferral. We describe how different forms of evidence are brought into play and how patterns of physical features are identified as genetic or not. We suggest that clinical categorical work helps articulate the genetic as an emergent domain of medical classification and that moments of ambiguity and deferral create an imperative space that helps legitimate the need for more technoscience, and consequently, more clinical judgment with which to fix the genetic future.
Aase, J. M.1990. Diagnostic dysmorphology. New York: Plenum Medical.
2.
Armstrong, D.2002. Clinical autonomy, individual and collective: The problem of changing doctors’ behaviour. Social Science and Medicine55 (10): 1771-1777.
3.
Atkinson, P.1995. Medical talk and medical work. London: Sage.
4.
Atkinson, P.1997. The clinical experience: The construction and reconstruction of medical reality. 2nd ed.Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate.
5.
Atkinson, P., E. Parsons, and K. Featherstone. 2001. Professional constructions of family and kinship in medical genetics. New Genetics and Society20 (1): 5-24.
6.
Atkinson, P., M. Reid, and P. Sheldrake. 1977. Medical mystique: Part 1: Indeterminacy and professional process; Part 2: Case studies in professional process. Sociology of Work and Occupations4 (3): 243-280.
7.
Berg, M.1992. The construction of medical disposals: Medical sociology and medical problem-solving in clinical practice. Sociology of Health and Illness14 (2): 151-180.
8.
Berg, M.1997. Rationalizing medical work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Bharadwaj, A.2002. Uncertain risk: Genetic screening for susceptibility to haemochromatosis. Health, Risk and Society4 (3): 227-240.
10.
Bouquet, M.1994. Family trees and their affinities: The visual imperative of the genealogical diagram. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, NS, 2 (1): 43-66.
11.
Bowker, G., and S. L. Star. 2000. Sorting things out. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
Brodwin, P.2002. Genetics, identity and the anthropology of essentialism. Anthropology Quarterly75 (2): 323-330.
13.
Cambrosio, A., R. D. Guttman, and P. Keating. 1994. New medical technologies and clinical practice: A survey of lymphocyte subset monitoring. Clinical Transplantation8 (6): 532-540.
14.
(Originally Le normal et le pathologique, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1966).
15.
Chadwick, R.1992. Having children. In Ethics, reproduction and genetic control, edited by R. Chadwick, 3-43. London: Routledge.
16.
Cooper, R.1992. Formal organization as representation: Remote control, displacement and abbreviation. In Rethinking organization: New directions in organization theory, edited by M. Reed and M. Hughes, 254-272. London: Sage.
17.
Cox, S. M., and R. C. Starzomski. 2004. Genes and geneticization? The social construction of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. New Genetics and Society23 (2): 137-166.
18.
Cussins, C.1996. Ontological choreography: Agency through signification in infertility clinics. Social Studies of Science26 (3): 575-610.
19.
de Chadarevian, S., and K. Harmke, eds. 1998. Molecularizing biology and medicine: New practices and alliances, 1910s-1970s. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
20.
Dingwall, R., and H. Murray. 1983. Categorisation in accident and emergency departments: “Good” patients, “bad” patients and “children.”Sociology of Health and Illness5 (2):127-148.
21.
Douglas, M.1966. Purity and danger. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.
22.
Ettore, E.2002. Reproductive genetics, gender and the body. London: Routledge.
23.
Featherstone, K., J. Latimer, P. Atkinson, D. Pilz, and A. Clarke. 2005. Dysmorphology and the spectacle of the clinic. Sociology of Health and Illness27 (5): 551-574.
24.
Finkler, K.2000. Experiencing the new genetics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
25.
Fleck, L.1979. The genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Foucault, M.1976. The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. Trans. A. M. Sheridan. London: Tavistock.
27.
Foucault, M.1991. Politics and the study of discourse. In The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, edited by G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 53-72. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
28.
Fujimura, J.1996. Crafting science: A sociohistory of the quest for the genetics of cancer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Gaudillière, J-P. 1992. Biochimistes et biomédecine dans l’après-guerre: Deux itineraires entre laboratoire et hospital [Biochemists and biomedicine in the post-war period: Two itineraries between the laboratory and the hospital]. Sciences Sociales et Santé10 (1): 107-147.
30.
Gaudillière, J-P. 1993. Oncogenes as metaphors for human cancer: Articulating laboratory practices and medical demands. In Medicine and change, edited by I. Löwy, 212-248. Paris: John Libbey.
31.
Gaudillière, J-P. 2002. Inventer la biomédicine: La France, l’Amerique et la production des savoirs du vivant après 1945 [The invention of biomedecine: France, America and the production of serious science]. Paris: La Découverte.
32.
Gaudillière, J-P., and I. Löwy, eds. 1998. Invisible industrialists: Manufactures and the production of scientific knowledge. London: Macmillan.
33.
Gibbon, S.2002. Re-examining geneticization: Family trees in breast cancer genetics. Science as Culture11 (4): 429-457.
34.
Hedgecoe, A.2002. Reinventing diabetes: Classification, division, and the geneticization of disease. New Genetics and Society21 (1): 7-27.
35.
Hedgecoe, A.2003. Expansion and uncertainty: Cystic fibrosis, classification and genetics. Sociology of Health and Illness25 (1): 50-70.
36.
Hedgecoe, A.2004. A reply to Anne Kerr. Sociology of Health and Illness26 (1): 107-109.
37.
Hedgecoe, A., and R. Tutton. 2002. Guest editorial: Genetics in society/society in genetics. Science as Culture11 (4): 421-428.
38.
Hogle, L. F.1995. Standardization across non-standard domains: The case of organ procurement. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 20 (4): 482-500.
39.
Jamous, H., and B. Peloille. 1970. Professions of self-perpetuating system? In Professions and professionalisation, edited by J. A. Jackson, 109-152. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Jeffery, R.1979. Normal rubbish: Deviant patients in casualty departments. Sociology of Health and Illness1 (1): 91-107.
41.
Keating, P., and A. Cambrosio. 2003. Biomedical platforms: Realigning the normal and the pathological in late-twentieth-century medicine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
Kerr, A.2000. (Re)constructing genetic disease: The clinical continuum between cystic fibrosis and male infertility. Social Studies of Science30 (6): 847-894.
43.
Kerr, A.2004a. Genetics and society: A sociology of disease. London: Routledge.
44.
Kerr, A.2004b. Giving up on geneticization: A comment on Hedgecoe’s “Expansion and uncertainty: Cystic fibrosis, classification and genetics.”Sociology of Health and Illness26 (1): 102-106.
45.
King, L. S.1982. Medical thinking: A historical perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
Kuhn, T. S.1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
Latimer, J.1997. Giving patients a future: The constituting of classes in an acute medical unit. Sociology of Health and Illness19 (2): 160-185.
48.
Latimer, J.2004a. Commanding materials: (Re)legitimating authority in the context of multi-disciplinary work. Sociology38 (4): 757-775.
49.
Latimer, J. 2004b. Categorising the genetic: The interaction of the clinic, the gene and the family in the construction of the genetic future. Paper presented at the 4S/EASST Conference: Public Proofs: Science, Technology and Democracy. Ecole des Mines, Paris, August. http://www.csi.ensmp.fr/WebCSI/4S/search/search_P/search_P.php
50.
Latimer, J., D. Pilz, P. Atkinson, A. Clarke, and K. Featherstone. 2004. The clinical picture: the interaction of clinical medicine and genetic technology. Economic and Social Research Council Research Report. Available from the authors.
51.
Latimer, J., D. Pilz, P. Atkinson, A. Clarke, and K. Featherstone. 2006. The clinical picture: The interaction of clinical medicine and genetic technology. Cardiff Working Paper Series. http://www.cf.ac.uk/socsi/publications/workingpapers/index.html
52.
Latour, B.1987. Science in action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
53.
Latour, B.1988. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.
54.
Lock, M., and P. Kaufert. 1998. Pragmatic women and body politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Long, J.1992. Foucault’s clinic. The Journal of Medical Humanities13 (3): 119-138.
56.
Löwy, I.1996. Between bench and bedside: Science, healing and Interleukin-2 in a cancer ward. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
Martin, E.1998. Anthropology and the cultural study of science. Science, Technology, & Human Values23: (2): 24-44.
58.
Nukaga, Y., and A. Cambrosio. 1997. Medical pedigrees and the visual production of family disease in Canadian and Japanese genetic counseling practice. In The sociology of medical science and technology, edited by M. A. Elston, 29-55. Oxford: Blackwell.
59.
Osbourne, T.1992. Medicine and epistemology: Michel Foucault and the liberality of clinical reason. History of the Human Sciences5 (2): 63-93.
60.
Rabinow, P.1992. Artificiality and enlightenment: From sociobiology to biosociality. In Incorporations, edited by J. Crary and S. Kwinter, 234-251. New York: Urzone.
61.
Rabinow, P.2000. Epochs, presents, events. In Living and working with the new medical technologies: Intersections of inquiry, edited by M. Lock, A. Young, and A. Cambrosio, 31-48. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
62.
Sarangi, S., and A. J. Clarke. 2002. Zones of expertise and the management of uncertainty in genetics risk communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction35 (2): 139-171.
63.
Shaw, A., J. Latimer, P. Atkinson, and K. Featherstone. 2003. Surveying slides: Clinical perception and clinical judgment in the construction of a genetic diagnosis. New Genetics and Society22 (1): 3-19.
64.
Sinding, C.1989. The history of resistant rickets: A model for understanding the growth of medical knowledge. Journal of the History of Biology22 (3): 461-495.
65.
Sinding, C.1990. Basic science and clinical research: The development of the concept of organ resistance to a hormone. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences45 (3): 198-232.
66.
Sinding, C.1991. Le clinicien et le chercheur: De grandes maladies de carence à la médicine moleculaire, 1880-1980 [The clinician and the researcher: Major diseases of deficiency in molecular medicine]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
67.
Strathern, M.1992. Reproducing the future: Anthropology, kinship and the new reproductive technologies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68.
Strathern, M.1996. Enabling identity? Biology, choice and the new reproductive technologies. In Questions of Cultural Identity, edited by S. Hall and P. du Gay, 37-52. London: Sage.
69.
Timmermans, S., and M. Berg. 2003. The gold standard: The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
70.
Wailoo, K.1997. Drawing blood: Technology and disease identity in twentieth-century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
71.
White, S.2002. Accomplishing “the case” in paediatrics and child health: Medicine and morality in inter-professional talk. Sociology of Health and Illness24 (4): 409-435.
72.
Yoxen, E.1982. Constructing genetic diseases. In The problem of medical knowledge: Examining the social construction of medicine, edited by P. Wright and A. Treacher, 144-161. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
