Speckle appears in all conventional ultrasound images and is caused by the use of a phase-sensitive transducer. Speckle is an undesirable property as it can mask small but perhaps diagnostically significant image features. In this paper a homomorphic, hybrid nonlinear processing method, based on cancellation of scattering interference, is developed and examined. Experiments with synthetic and real ultrasound imagery show that the proposed method improves the contrast-to-noise ratio in both lesion and cyst areas and preserves edge clarity.
FlaxS. W.GloverG. H.PelcN. J., Textural variations in B-mode ultrasonography: A stochastic model, Ultrasonic Imaging3, 235–257 (1981).
3.
AbbottJ. G.ThurstoneF. L., Acoustic speckle: Theory and experimental analysis, Ultrasonic Imaging1, 303–324 (1979).
4.
DaintyJ. C., Laser Speckle and Related Phenomena, 9–75 (Springer-VerlagBerlin/Heidelberg/NY, 1975).
5.
TuthillT. A.SperryR. H.ParkerK. J., Deviations from Rayleigh statistics in ultrasonic speckle, Ultrasonic Imaging10, 81–89 (1988).
6.
GoodmanJ. W., A random walk through the field of speckle, Optical Engin.25, 610–612 (1986).
7.
WagnerR. F.InsanaM. F.BrownD. G., Statistical properties of radio-frequency and envelope-detected signals with applications to medical ultrasound, J. Opt. Soc. Am.4, 910–922 (1986).
8.
MagninP. A.von RammO. T.ThurstoneF. L., Frequency compounding for speckle contrast reduction in phased array images, Ultrasonic Imaging4, 267–281 (1982).
9.
GallowayR. L.McDermottB. A.ThurstoneF. L., A frequency diversity process for speckle reduction in real-time ultrasonic images, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Contr., 35, 45–49 (1988).
10.
GieseyJ. J.CarsonP. L.FittingD. W.MeyerC. R., Speckle reduction in pulse-echo ultrasonic imaging using a two-dimensional receiving array, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Contr., 39, 167–173 (1992).
11.
TraheyG. E.SmithS. W.Von RammO. T., Speckle pattern correlation with lateral aperture translation: experimental results and implications for spatial compounding, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Contr., 33, 257–264 (1986).
12.
LoupasT.McDickenW. N.AllanP. L., Adaptive weighted median filter for speckle suppression in medical ultrasonic images, IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems36, 129–135 (1989).
13.
BamberJ. C.DaftC., Adaptive filtering for reduction of speckle in ultrasonic pulse-echo images, Ultrasonics24, 41–44 (1986).
14.
CrimminsT. R., Geometric filter for speckle reduction, Applied Optics24, 1438–1443 (1985).
15.
FongY. S.Pomalaza-RaezC. A.WangX. H., Comparison study of nonlinear filters in image processing applications, Optical Engin.28, 749–760 (1989).
16.
KotropoulosC.PitasI., Optimum nonlinear signal detection and estimation in the presence of the ultrasonic speckle, Ultrasonic Imaging14, 249–275 (1992).
LaugierP.FinkM.AbouelkaramS., The random phase transducer: a new technique for incoherent processing-experimental results, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Contr., 37, 70–78 (1990).
19.
FosterD. R.ArditiM.FosterF. S.PattersonM. S.HuntJ. W., Computer simulation of speckle in B-scan images, Ultrasonic Imaging5, 308–330 (1983).
20.
OosterveldB. J.ThijseenJ. M.VerhoefW. A., Texture of B-mode echograms: 3-D simulations and experiments of the effects of diffraction and scatterer density, Ultrasonic Imaging7, 142–160 (1985).
ParkJ. C.ParkS. B., An efficient computer model of three-dimensional speckle patterns in dynamically focused annular array, Ultrasonic Imaging15, 103–121 (1993).
23.
DickinsonR. J., A computer model for speckle in ultrasound images: theory and application, Acoustical Imaging10, 115–129, MetherellA. F., Ed., (New York, 1982).
24.
CzerwinskiR. N.JonesD. L.O'BrienW. D., Jr., Edge detection in ultrasound speckle noise, IEEE Proceed. ICIP1, 304–308 (1994).
25.
WagnerR. F.SmithS. W.SandrikJ. M.LopezH., Statistics of speckle in Ultrasound B-scans, IEEE Trans. Sonics UltrasonicsSU-30, 156–163 (1983).
