Optimized wideband attenuation estimations were performed on a tissue mimicking phantom in a water tank with and without axial beam translation (ABT), and the results were compared to those from standard substitution measurements. A −17 percent discrepancy between the results of the substitution method and the optimized estimation without ABT was noted in the far field. This discrepancy was eliminated when ABT was utilized.
OphirJ.McWhirtR.F.MakladN.F.JaegerP.M., A narrowband pulse echo technique for in vivo ultrasonic attenuation estimation, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.BME-32, 202–212 (1984).
2.
KucR.SchwartzM.Von MicskyL., Parametric Estimation of the Acoustic Attenuation Coefficient Slope for Soft Tissue, in 1976 IEEE Ultrasonic Sump. Proc., pp. 44–47 (IEEE Cat. No. 76 CH 1120-5, SU).
3.
KucR., Statistical Estimation of the Acoustic Attenuation Slope for Liver Tissue. Ph.D. Dissertation, University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, MI, (1977).
4.
KucR., Clinical application of an ultrasound attenuation coefficient estimation technique for liver pathology characterization, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engineering BME27, 312–319 (1980).
5.
JonesJ.P.BehrensM., In vivo measurements of frequency dependent attenuation in normal liver, pancreas and spleen, Ultrasonic Imaging3205 (1981) (Abstract only).
6.
OphirJ.MakladN.F.JaegerP., Ultrasound Phantom. US Patent 4,286,455, (1981).
7.
KucR., Estimating acoustic attenuation from reflected ultrasound signals: comparison of spectral shift and spectral-difference approaches, IEEE Trans., Acoust. Speech Sig. Proc.ASSP-32, 1–6 (1984).
8.
StepanishenP.R., Transient radiation from pistons in an infinite planar baffle, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, 49, 1629–2638 (1971).
9.
KucR.SchwartzM., Estimating the acoustic attenuation coefficient slope from reflected ultrasound signals, IEEE Trans. Sonics UltrasonicsSU-26, 353–362 (1979).
10.
KakA.C.DinesK.A., Signal processing of broadband pulsed ultrasound: measurement of attenuation of soft biological tissues, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.BME-25, 321–344 (1978).
11.
OphirJ.MakladN.F., A New Stochastic C-Scan Technique for Attenuation Coefficient Measurement in Tissue Equivalent Material, in Proc. 23rd Ann. Meeting of the American Inst. Ultras. Med., Vol. 1 p. 188, 1978 (Abstract only).
12.
OphirJ.MakladN.F.BigelowR.H., Ultrasonic attenuation measurements of in vivo human muscle, Ultrasonic Imaging4, 250–295 (1982).
13.
HottierF.FinkM.BergerG., Experimental estimation of ultrasonic attenuation in liver using short-time Fourier analysis: influence of system parameters, Ultrasonic Imaging4, 178 (1982) (Abstract only).
14.
KucR., Modeling and estimations reflected signal spectra. Ultrasonic Imaging4, 177, (1982) (Abstract only).
InsanaM.ZagzebskiJ.MadsenE., Improvements in the spectral difference method for measuring ultrasonic attenuation, Ultrasonic Imaging5, 331–345 (1983).
17.
CloostermansM.J.T.M.ThijssenJ.M., A beam corrected estimation of the frequency dependent attenuation of biological tissues from backscattered ultrasound, Ultrasonic Imaging5, 136–147 (1983).
LinT.S.OphirJ.PotterG., Frequency dependent ultrasonic differentiation of normal and diffusely diseased liver. J. Acoust. soc. Am.82, 1131–1138 (1987).
20.
MarcusP.W.CarstensenE.L., Problems with absorption measurements of inhomogenous solids, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.58, 1334–1335 (1975).
21.
BusseL.J.MillerJ.G., A Comparison of Finite Aperture Phase Sensitive and Phase Insensitive Detection in the Near Field and Inhomogenous Material, in 1981 IEEE ultrasonics Symp. Proc., 616–617 (IEEE Cat. No. 81CH 1689-9).
22.
KucR., Bounds on estimating the acoustic attenuation of small tissue regions from reflected ultrasound, Proc. IEEE73, 1159–1168 (1985).
23.
LinT.S.OphirJ., Comments on attenuation measurement uncertainties caused by speckle statistics, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.82, 1449 (1987).
