Although the two dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography has gained a strong position among medical diagnostic techniques in cardiology, it still requires further developments to improve its repeatability and reliability. Few works have attempted to incorporate the left ventricle segmentation results in the process of displacements and strain estimation to improve its performance. We proposed the use of mask information as an additional penalty in the elastic image registration based displacements estimation. This approach was studied using a short axis view synthetic echocardiographic data, segmented using an active contour method. The obtained masks were distorted to a different degree, using different methods to assess the influence of the segmentation quality on the displacements and strain estimation process. The results of displacements and circumferential strain estimations show, that even though the method is dependent on the mask quality, the potential loss in accuracy due to the poor segmentation quality is much lower than the potential accuracy gain in cases where the segmentation performs well.
MondilloSGalderisiMMeleDCameliMLomorielloVSZacàV, et al. Speckle-Tracking echocardiography. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(1):71-83.
5.
FarsalinosKEDarabanAMÜnlüSThomasJDBadanoLPVoigtJ-U.Head-to-Head comparison of global longitudinal strain measurements among nine different vendors. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(10):1171-81.e2.
6.
D’hoogeJBarbosaDGaoHClausPPraterDHamiltonJ, et al. Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: standardization efforts based on synthetic ultrasound data. Eur Heart J – Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(6):693-701.
7.
ThomasJDBadanoLP.EACVI-ASE-industry initiative to standardize deformation imaging: a brief update from the co-chairs. Eur Heart J – Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;14(11):1039-40.
8.
CastelA-LMenetAEnnezatP-VDelelisFLe GofficCBindaC, et al. Global longitudinal strain software upgrade: implications for intervendor consistency and longitudinal imaging studies. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;109(1):22-30.
9.
NegishiKNegishiTKurosawaKHristovaKPopescuBAVinereanuD, et al. Practical guidance in echocardiographic assessment of global longitudinal strain. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(4):489-92.
10.
CostaSPBeaverTARollorJLVanichakarnPMagnusPCPalacRT.Quantification of the variability associated with repeat measurements of left ventricular two-dimensional global longitudinal strain in a real-world setting. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27(1):50-4.
11.
MireaOPagoureliasEDDuchenneJBogaertJThomasJDBadanoLP, et al. Variability and reproducibility of segmental longitudinal strain measurement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(1):15-24.
12.
VoigtJ-UPedrizzettiGLysyanskyPMarwickTHHouleHBaumannR, et al. Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. Eur Heart J – Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(1):1-11.
13.
CyganSKumorMZmigrodzkiJLeśniak-PlewińskaBKowalskiMKałuzyńskiK. Left ventricular phantoms with inclusions simulating transmural and non-transmural infarctions: FEM and EchoPAC study. In: DuricNHeydeB, eds. Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging – Proceedings of SPIE. SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2017, P. 1013918. http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?doi=10.1117/12.2254350
14.
XuLWangNChenXLiangYZhouHYanJ.Quantitative evaluation of myocardial layer-specific strain using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography among young adults with essential hypertension in China. Medicine. 2018;97(39):e12448.
15.
ChakrabortyBZhiLHeydeBLuoJD’hoogeJ. 2D RF-based non-rigid image registration for cardiac motion estimation: comparison against block matching. In: 2016 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), Tours, 2016, pp. 1–4. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7728621/
16.
ŻmigrodzkiJCyganSLeśniak-PlewińskaBKowalskiMKałużyńskiK.Effect of transmural extent of the simulated infarction in a left ventricular model on displacement and strain distribution estimated from synthetic ultrasonic data. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017;43(1):206-17.
17.
ŻmigrodzkiJCyganSKałużyńskiK.Evaluation of strain averaging area and strain estimation errors in a spheroidal left ventricular model using synthetic image data and speckle tracking. BMC Med Imaging. 2021;21(1):105.
18.
DalenHThorstensenAAaseSAIngulCBTorpHVattenLJ, et al. Segmental and global longitudinal strain and strain rate based on echocardiography of 1266 healthy individuals: the HUNT study in Norway. Eur Heart J – Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;11(2):176-83.
19.
van MourikMJWZaarDVJSmuldersMWHeijmanJLumensJDokterJE, et al. Adding speckle-tracking echocardiography to visual assessment of systolic wall motion abnormalities improves the detection of myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019;32(1):65-73.
20.
CollierPPhelanDKleinA.A test in context: myocardial strain measured by speckle-tracking echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:1043-56.
21.
AlessandriniMHeydeBQueirosSCyganSZontakMSomphoneO, et al. Detailed evaluation of five 3D speckle tracking algorithms using synthetic echocardiographic recordings. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016;35(8):1915-26.
HeydeBAlessandriniMHermansJBarbosaDClausPD’hoogeJ.Anatomical image registration using volume conservation to assess cardiac deformation from 3D ultrasound recordings. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016;35:501-11.
24.
LuCChelikaniSPapademetrisXKniselyJPMilosevicMFChenZ, et al. An integrated approach to segmentation and nonrigid registration for application in image-guided pelvic radiotherapy. Med Image Anal. 2011;15(5):772-85.
25.
ElmahdyMSWolterinkJMSokootiHIšgumIStaringM.Adversarial optimization for joint registration and segmentation in prostate CT radiotherapy. In: ShenD, et al. eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 11769. Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 366-74. http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.12223
26.
ParajuliNCompasCBLinBASampathSO’DonnellMSinusasAJ, et al. Sparsity and biomechanics inspired integration of shape and speckle tracking for cardiac deformation analysis. In: van AssenHBovendeerdPDelhaasT, eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Springer, Cham; 2015, pp. 57-64. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27976753/
27.
ParajuliNLuAStendahlJCZontakMBoutagyNEberleM, et al. Integrated dynamic shape tracking and RF speckle tracking for cardiac motion analysis. In: OurselinSJoskowiczLSabuncuMUnalGWellsW, eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Springer, Cham; 2016, pp. 431-8. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-46720-7_50
28.
CompasCBWongEYHuangXSampathSLinBAPalP, et al. Radial basis functions for combining shape and speckle tracking in 4D echocardiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014;33(6):1275-89.
29.
CompasCBLinBASampathSHuangLWeiQSinusasAJ, et al. Comparing shape tracking, speckle tracking, and a combined method for deformation analysis in echocardiography. In: Proceedings – 2011 1st IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, Imaging and Systems Biology, HISB 2011, San Jose, CA, 2011, pp. 120-5.
30.
MahapatraDSunY.Integrating segmentation information for improved mrf-based elastic image registration. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2012;21(1):170-83.
31.
LiuJBanchsJMousaviNPlanaJCScherrer-CrosbieMThavendiranathanP, et al. Contemporary role of echocardiography for clinical decision making in patients during and after cancer therapy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:1122-31.
32.
BursiFSantangeloGSansaloneDValliFVellaAMTorielloF, et al. Prognostic utility of quantitative offline 2D-echocardiography in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 disease. Echocardiography. 2020;37(12):2029-39.
33.
GallardAGalliEHubertABidautALe RolleVSmisethO, et al. Echocardiographic view and feature selection for the estimation of the response to CRT. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0252857.
34.
DohertyJUKortSMehranRSchoenhagenPSomanPPanelR, et al. ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2019 appropriate use criteria for multimodality imaging in the assessment of cardiac structure and function in nonvalvular heart disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019;32:553-79.
35.
ZmigrodzkiJCyganSWilczewskaAKaluzynskiK.Quantitative assessment of the effect of the out-of-plane movement of the homogenous ellipsoidal model of the left ventricle on the deformation measures estimated using 2D speckle tracking: an in-silico study. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2018;65(10):1789-803.
36.
CyganSŻmigrodzkiJLeśniak-PlewińskaBKarnyMPakiełaZKałużyńskiK.Influence of polivinylalcohol cryogel material model in FEM simulations on deformation of LV phantom. In: van AssenHBovendeerdP andDelhaasT, eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 9126. Springer, Cham; 2015, pp. 313-20. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-20309-6_36
37.
HeydeBCyganSChoiHFLesniak-PlewinskaBBarbosaDElenA, et al. Regional cardiac motion and strain estimation in three-dimensional echocardiography: a validation study in thick-walled univentricular phantoms. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2012;59(4):668-82.
38.
Lesniak-PlewinskaBCyganSKaluzynskiKD’hoogeJZmigrodzkiJKowalikE, et al. A dual-chamber, thick-walled cardiac phantom for use in cardiac motion and deformation imaging by ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36(7):1145-56.
39.
CyganS.Modelowanie numeryczne fantomów serca na potrzeby obrazowania odkształceń w echokardiografii (Numerical modeling of heart phantoms as a support for strain imaging in echocardiography). Warsaw: Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza EXIT; 2019. http://www.exit.pl/cyg.htm
40.
RösnerABarbosaDAarsætherEKjønåsDSchirmerHD’hoogeJ.The influence of frame rate on two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain measurements: a study on silico-simulated models and images recorded in patients. Eur Heart J – Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(10):1137-47.
41.
JensenJASvendsenNB.Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1992;39(2):262-7.
LeclercSSmistadEPedrosaJOstvikACervenanskyFEspinosaF, et al. Deep learning for segmentation using an open large-scale dataset in 2D echocardiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019;38(9):2198-210.
44.
HuYXiaBMaoMJinZDuJGuoL, et al. AIDAN: an attention-guided dual-path network for pediatric echocardiography segmentation. IEEE Access. 2020;8:29176-87.
45.
AlessandriniMChakrabortyBHeydeBBernardODe CraeneMSermesantM, et al. Realistic vendor-specific synthetic ultrasound data for quality assurance of 2d speckle tracking echocardiography: simulation pipeline and open access database. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2017;65(3):411-22.
46.
KybicJUnserM.Fast parametric elastic image registration. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2003;12(11):1427-42.
47.
WilczewskaACyganSŻmigrodzkiJ.Displacement field estimation for echocardiography strain imaging using B-spline based elastic image registration: synthetic data study. In: JabłońskiR andSzewczykR, eds. Recent Global Research and Education: Technological Challenges. Springer International Publishing; Warsaw, 2017, pp. 309-15. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-46490-9_42
48.
RueckertDSonodaLIHayesCHillDLLeachMOHawkesDJ.Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999; 18(8):712-21.
49.
KeysR.Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing. IEEE Trans Acoust. 1981;29(6):1153-60.
50.
RohlfingTMaurerCRBluemkeDAJacobsMA.Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003;22(6):730-41.
51.
GarciaD.Robust smoothing of gridded data in one and higher dimensions with missing values. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2010;54(4):1167-78.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
