Clinical assessment of myocardial ischemia based on visually-assessed wall motion scoring from echocardiography is semiquantitative, operator dependent, and heavily weighted by operator experience and expertise. Cardiac motion estimation methods such as tissue Doppler imaging, used to assess myocardial muscle velocity, provides quantitative parameters such as the strain-rate and strain derived from Doppler velocity. However, tissue Doppler imaging does not differentiate between active contraction and simple rotation or translation of the heart wall, nor does it differentiate tethering (passively following) tissue from active contraction. In this paper, we present a strain imaging modality called cardiac elastography that provides two-dimensional strain information. A method for obtaining and displaying both directional and magnitude cardiac elastograms and displaying strain over the entire cross-section of the heart is described. Elastograms from a patient with coronary artery disease are compared with those from a healthy volunteer. Though observational, the differences suggest that cardiac elastography may be a useful tool for assessment of myocardial function. The method is two-dimensional, real time and avoids the disadvantage of observer-dependent judgment of myocardial contraction and relaxation estimated from conventional echocardiography.
WillenheimerRBErhardtLRClineCMRydbergERIsraelssonBA, Prognostic significance of changes in left ventricular systolic function in elderly patients with congestive heart failure, Coron Artery Dis8, 711–717 (1997).
7.
MarwickTH, Current status of stress echocardiography for diagnosis and prognostic assessment of coronary artery disease, Coron Artery Dis9, 411–426 (1998).
8.
NagelELehmkuhlHBBockschWKleinCVogelUFrantzEEllmerADreysseSFleckE, Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography, Circulation99, 763–770 (1999).
9.
MandalapuBPAmatoMStratmannHG, Technetium Tc 99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging: current role for evaluation of prognosis, Chest115, 1684–1694 (1999).
10.
TaroloGLFiorentiniCBestettiA, Nuclear cardiology and echocardiography for the assessment of myocardial viability, Quart J Nucl Med40, 91–107 (1996).
11.
VanoverscheldeJLGerberBPasquetAMelinJA, Nuclear and echocardiographic imaging for prediction of reversible left ventricular ischemic dysfunction after coronary revascularization: current status and future directions, J Cardiovasc Pharmacol28 Suppl1, S27–36 (1996).
MeunierJBertrandMMaillouxGPetitclercR, Assessing local myocardial deformation from speckle tracking in echography, in Proc SPIE914, pp. 20–29 (1988).
14.
MeunierJBertrandM, Echographic image mean gray level changes with tissue dynamics: a system-based model study, IEEE Trans Biomed Engin42, 403–410 (1995).
15.
VitarelliASciomerSPencoMDagiantiAPuglieseM, Assessment of left ventricular dyssynergy by color kinesis, Am J Cardiol81, 86G–90G (1998).
16.
KaulSPandianNGGillamLDNewellJBOkadaRDWeymanAE, Contrast echocardiography in acute myocardial ischemia. III. An in vivo comparison of the extent of abnormal wall motion with the area at risk for necrosis, J Am Coll Cardiol7, 383–392 (1986).
17.
WeymanAEFranklinTDJr.HoganRDGillamLDWiskePSNewellJGibbonsEFFoaleRA, Importance of temporal heterogeneity in assessing the contraction abnormalities associated with acute myocardial ischemia, Circulation70, 102–112 (1984).
18.
HeimdalAStoylenATorpHSkjaerpeT, Real-time strain rate imaging of the left ventricle by ultrasound, J Am Soc Echocardiogr11, 1013–1019 (1998).
19.
PelcNJHerfkensRJShimakawaAEnzmannDR, Phase contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging, Magn Reson Quart7, 229–254 (1991).
20.
OsmanNFSampathSAtalarEPrinceJL, Imaging longitudinal cardiac strain on short-axis images using strain-encoded MRI, Magn Reson Med46, 324–334 (2001).
21.
DenneyTSJr.PrinceJL, Reconstruction of 3-D left ventricular motion from planar tagged cardiac MR images: an estimation theoretic approach, IEEE Trans Med Imaging14, 625–635 (1995).
22.
MirskyIParmleyWW, Assessment of passive elastic stiffness for isolated heart muscle and the intact heart, Circ Res33, 233–243 (1973).
23.
MirskyI, Basic Terminology and Formulae for Left Ventricular Wall Stress (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974).
24.
PrinzenFWAugustijnCHAllessieMAArtsTDelhaasTRenemanRS, The time sequence of electrical and mechanical activation during spontaneous beating and ectopic stimulation, Eur Heart J13, 535–543 (1992).
25.
Van LeuvenSLWaldmanLKMcCullochADCovellJW, Gradients of epicardial strain across the perfusion boundary during acute myocardial ischemia, Am J Physiol267, H2348–2362 (1994).
26.
DouglasASRodriguezEKO'DellWHunterWC, Unique strain history during ejection in canine left ventricle, Am J Physiol260, H1596–1611 (1991).
27.
HashimaARYoungAAMcCullochADWaldmanLK, Nonhomogeneous analysis of epicardial strain distributions during acute myocardial ischemia in the dog, J Biomech26, 19–35 (1993).
28.
FannJISarrisGEIngelsNBJr.NiczyporukMAYunKLDaughtersGT2ndDerbyGCMillerDC, Regional epicardial and endocardial two-dimensional finite deformations in canine left ventricle, Am J Physiol261, H1402–1410 (1991).
29.
PieneHMyhreES, Position of interventricular septum during heart cycle in anesthetized dogs, Am J Physiol260, H158–164 (1991).
30.
AzhariHWeissJLRogersWJSiuCOZerhouniEAShapiroEP, Noninvasive quantification of principal strains in normal canine hearts using tagged MRI images in 3-D, Am J Physiol264, H205–216 (1993).
31.
McCullochADOmensJH, Non-homogeneous analysis of three-dimensional transmural finite deformation in canine ventricular myocardium, J Biomech24, 539–548 (1991).
32.
AxelL, Noninvasive measurement of cardiac strain with MRI, Adv Exp Med Biol.430, 249–256 (1997).
33.
RademakersFERogersWJGuierWHHutchinsGMSiuCOWeisfeldtMLWeissJLShapiroEP, Relation of regional cross-fiber shortening to wall thickening in the intact heart. Three-dimensional strain analysis by NMR tagging, Circulation89, 1174–1182 (1994).
34.
McDickenWNSutherlandGRMoranCMGordonLN, Colour Doppler velocity imaging of the myocardium, Ultrasound Med Biol18, 651–654 (1992).
35.
SutherlandGRStewartMJGroundstroemKWMoranCMFlemingAGuell-PerisFJRiemersmaRAFennLNFoxKAMcDickenWN, Color Doppler myocardial imaging: a new technique for the assessment of myocardial function, J Am Soc Echocardiogr7, 441–458 (1994).
36.
FlemingADXiaAMcDickenWNSutherlandGRFennL, Myocardial velocity gradients detected by Doppler imaging, Brit J Radiology67, 679–688 (1994).
37.
VargheseTOphirJKonofagouEKallelFRighettiR, Tradeoffs in elastographic imaging, Ultrasonic Imaging23, 216–248 (2001).
38.
OphirJCespedesIPonnekantiHYazdiYLiX, Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues, Ultrasonic Imaging13, 111–134 (1991).
39.
BamberJCBushNL, Freehand elasticity imaging using speckle decorrelation rate, in Acoustic Imaging22, pp. 285–292 (1996).
40.
KrouskopTADoughertyDRVinsonFS, A pulsed Doppler ultrasonic system for making noninvasive measurements of the mechanical properties of soft tissue, J Rehab Res Develop24, 1–8 (1987).
41.
O'DonnellMSkovorodaARShapoBMEmelianovSY, Internal displacement and strain imaging using ultrasonic speckle tracking, IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Contr41, 314–325 (1994).
42.
ParkerKJHuangSRMusulinRALernerRM, Tissue response to mechanical vibrations for “sonoelasticity imaging,”Ultrasound Med Biol16, 241–246 (1990).
43.
WilsonLSRobinsonDE, Ultrasonic measurement of small displacements and deformations of tissue, Ultrasonic Imaging4, 71–82 (1982).
44.
KonofagouEED'HoogeJOphirJ, Myocardial elastography—a feasibility study in vivo, Ultrasound Med Biol28, 475–482 (2002).
45.
VargheseTZagzebskiJARahkoPDouglasPSBreburdaCS, Cardiac Elastography: A novel method for real-time 2-D Strain Imaging (abstract), J Ultrasound Med21, S44 (2002).
46.
VargheseTBreburdaCSZagzebskiJARahkoP, Method and Apparatus for Cardiac Elastography, United States Patent P02274US, (2002).
47.
BreburdaCSVargheseTZagzebskiJARahkoPS, Echo Elastography: a novel method for quantitative real-time two-dimensional strain imaging (abstract), J Am Soc Echocardiogr15, 486 (2002).
48.
OphirJGarraBKallelFKonofagouEKrouskopTRighettiRVargheseT, Elastographic imaging, Ultrasound Med Biol26, Suppl., S23–29 (2000).
49.
McVeighERZerhouniEA, Noninvasive measurement of transmural gradients in myocardial strain with MR imaging, Radiology180, 677–683 (1991).
50.
VargheseTBilgenMOphirJ, Multiresolution imaging in elastography, IIEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Contr45, 65–75 (1998).
51.
VargheseTOphirJ, A theoretical framework for performance characterization of elastography: the strain filter, IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Contr44, 164–172 (1997).
