Acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) is a newly developed elastography technique that uses acoustic radiation force to provide additional stiffness information to conventional sonography. A computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system was proposed to automatically specify the tumor boundaries in ARFI images and quantify the statistical stiffness information to reduce user dependence. The level-set segmentation was used to delineate tumor boundaries in B-mode images, and the segmented boundaries were then mapped to the corresponding area in ARFI images for a gray-scale calculation. A total of 61 benign and 51 malignant tumors were evaluated in the experiment. The CAD system based on the proposed ARFI features achieved an accuracy of 80% (90/112), a sensitivity of 80% (41/51), and a specificity of 80% (49/61), which is significantly better than that of the quantitative B-mode features (p < 0.05). The ARFI features were further combined with the B-mode features, including shape and texture features, to further improve performance (area under the curve [AUC], 0.90 vs. 0.86). In conclusion, the CAD system based on the proposed ARFI features is a promising and efficient diagnostic method.
StavrosATThickmanDRappCLDennisMAParkerSHSisneyGA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology. 1995;196:123-34.
2.
ChaJHMoonWKChoNKimSMParkSHHanBK. Characterization of benign and malignant solid breast masses: comparison of conventional US and tissue harmonic imaging. Radiology. 2007;242:63-9.
3.
American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. 4th ed.Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003.
4.
ShenWCChangRFMoonWK. Computer aided classification system for breast ultrasound based on breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33:1688-98.
5.
ShenWCChangRFMoonWKChouYHHuangCS. Breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis using BI-RADS features. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:928-39.
6.
MoonWKLoCMChoNChangJMHuangCSChenJH. Computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses using quantified BI-RADS findings. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2013;111:84-92.
7.
JiangYNishikawaRMSchmidtRAToledanoAYDoiK. Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists’ interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications. Radiology. 2001;220:787-94.
8.
KuoWJChangRFMoonWKLeeCCChenDR. Computer-aided diagnosis of breast tumors with different US systems. Acad Radiol. 2002;9:793-9.
9.
JiangYLNishikawaRMSchmidtRAMetzCEGigerMLDoiK. Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol. 1999;6:22-33.
10.
RangayyanRMMudigondaNRDesautelsJEL. Boundary modelling and shape analysis methods for classification of mammographic masses. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2000;38:487-96.
11.
NieKChenJHYuHJChuYNalciogluOSuMY. Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:1513-25.
12.
MoonWKLoCMHuangCSChenJHChangRF. Computer-aided diagnosis based on speckle patterns in ultrasound images. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:1251-61.
13.
MoonWKLoCMChangJMHuangCSChenJHChangRF. Computer-aided classification of breast masses using speckle features of automated breast ultrasound images. Med Phys. 2012;39:6465-73.
14.
GruszauskasNPDrukkerKGigerMLChangRFSennettCAMoonWK. Breast US computer-aided diagnosis system: robustness across urban populations in South Korea and the United States. Radiology. 2009;253:661-71.
15.
ChoNMoonWKKimHYChangJMParkSHLyouCY. Sonoelastographic strain index for differentiation of benign and malignant nonpalpable breast masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:1-7.
16.
RagoTSantiniFScutariMPincheraAVittiP. Elastography: new developments in ultrasound for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:2917-22.
17.
TalwalkarJAKurtzDMSchoenleberSJWestCPMontoriVM. Ultrasound-based transient elastography for the detection of hepatic fibrosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1214-20.
ChoNMoonWKChangJMYiAKooHRParkJS. Sonoelastographic lesion stiffness: preoperative predictor of the presence of an invasive focus in nonpalpable DCIS diagnosed at US-guided needle biopsy. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1618-27.
20.
NightingaleK. Acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging: a review. Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2011;7:328.
21.
TozakiMIsobeSSakamotoM. Combination of elastography and tissue quantification using the acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology for differential diagnosis of breast masses. Jpn J Radiol. 2012;30:659-70.
22.
MengWZhangGCWuCJWuGZSongYLuZL. Preliminary results of acoustic radiation force impulse (Arfi) ultrasound imaging of breast lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37:1436-43.
23.
TozakiMIsobeSYamaguchiMOgawaYHommaKSaitoM. Ultrasonographic elastography of the breast using acoustic radiation force impulse technology: preliminary study. Jpn J Radiol. 2011;29:452-6.
24.
MoonWKChangSCHuangCSChangRF. Breast tumor classification using fuzzy clustering for breast elastography. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37:700-8.
25.
SuriJS. Advances in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Ultrasound Imaging. Boston: Artech House; 2008.
26.
DericheR. Fast algorithms for low-level vision. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1990;12:78-87.
27.
OliphantTEManducaAEhmanRLGreenleafJF. Complex-valued stiffness reconstruction for magnetic resonance elastography by algebraic inversion of the differential equation. Magn Reson Med. 2001;45:299-310.
28.
HaralickRMShanmugaKDinsteinI. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1973;SMC-3:610-21.
29.
FieldAP. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 3rd ed.Los Angeles: SAGE; 2009.
