We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography in differentiating between hepatic lesions. The prospective study included 117 patients with liver masses. Shear wave velocity (SWV) values for lesions were determined by ARFI imaging and compared statistically. The difference between SWV values for benign and malignant hepatic masses was significant (p < 0.01). The threshold SWV value for malignant hepatic lesions was established at 2.52 m/s, and the sensitivity and specificity of this cut-off value were 97% and 66%, respectively. We concluded that ARFI elastography provides supplementary data that aid in the differential diagnosis of liver masses.
AssyNNasserGDjibreABeniashviliZEliasSZidanJ. Characteristics of common solid liver lesions and recommendations for diagnostic workup. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3217-27.
2.
TrillaudHBruelJMValettePJVilgrainVSchmutzGOyenR. Characterization of focal liver lesions with SonoVue-enhanced sonography: international multicenter-study in comparison to CT and MRI. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3748-56.
3.
VilgrainV. Advancement in HCC imaging: diagnosis, staging and treatment efficacy assessments: hepatocellular carcinoma: imaging in assessing treatment efficacy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17:374-9. doi:10.1007/s00534-009-0230-3.
4.
HohmannJAlbrechtTHoffmannCWWolfKJ. Ultrasonographic detection of focal liver lesions: increased sensitivity and specificity with microbubble contrast agents. Eur J Radiol. 2003;46:147-59.
5.
NumminenKIsoniemiHHalavaaraJTervahartialaPMakisaloHLaasonenL. Preoperative assessment of focal liver lesions: multidetector computed tomography challenges magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol. 2005;46:9-15.
6.
FaheyBJNightingaleKRNelsonRCPalmeriMLTraheyGE. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of the abdomen: demonstration of feasibility and utility. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31:1185-98. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.05.004.
7.
NightingaleKPalmeriMTraheyG. Analysis of contrast in images generated with transient acoustic radiation force. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006;32:61-72. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.08.008.
8.
Friedrich-RustMWunderKKrienerSSotoudehFRichterSBojungaJ. Liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis: noninvasive assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging versus transient elastography. Radiology. 2009;252:595-604. doi:10.1148/radiol.2523081928.
9.
BoursierJIsselinGFouchard-HubertIObertiFDibNLebigotJ. Acoustic radiation force impulse: a new ultrasonographic technology for the widespread noninvasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;22:1074-84. doi:10.1097/MEG.0b013e328339e0a1.
10.
GoertzRSZopfYJuglVHeideRJansonCStrobelD. Measurement of liver elasticity with acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology: an alternative noninvasive method for staging liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis. Ultraschall Med (Stuttgart, Germany: 1980)2010;31:151-5. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1245244.
11.
GallottiAD’OnofrioMRomaniniLCantisaniVPozzi MucelliR. Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) ultrasound imaging of solid focal liver lesions. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:451-5. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.071.
12.
YuHWilsonSR. Differentiation of benign from malignant liver masses with Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse technique. Ultrasound Q. 2011;27:217-23. doi:10.1097/RUQ.0b013e318239422e.
13.
FaheyBJNelsonRCBradwayDPHsuSJDumontDMTraheyGE. In vivo visualization of abdominal malignancies with acoustic radiation force elastography. Phy Med Biol. 2008;53:279-93. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/1/020.
14.
HeideRStrobelDBernatikTGoertzRS. Characterization of focal liver lesions (FLL) with acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastometry. Ultraschall Med. 2010;31:405-9. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1245565.
15.
DaviesGKoenenM. Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography in distinguishing hepatic haemangiomata from metastases: preliminary observations. Br J Radiol. 2011;84:939-43. doi:10.1259/bjr/97637841.
16.
ChoSHLeeJYHanJKChoiBI. Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for the evaluation of focal solid hepatic lesions: preliminary findings. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36:202-8. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.10.009.
17.
Shuang-MingTPingZYingQLi-RongCPingZRui-ZhenL. Usefulness of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant liver lesions. Acad Radiol. 2011;18:810-5. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2011.01.026.
18.
KapoorAKapoorAMahajanGSidhuBSLakhanpalVP. Real-time elastography in differentiating metastatic from nonmetastatic liver nodules. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37:207-13. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.11.013.
19.
KatoKSugimotoHKanazumiNNomotoSTakedaSNakaoA. Intra-operative application of real-time tissue elastography for the diagnosis of liver tumours. Liver Int. 2008;28:1264-71. doi:10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01701.x.
20.
GuibalABoularanCBruceMVallinMPilleulFWalterT. Evaluation of shearwave elastography for the characterisation of focal liver lesions on ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:1138-49. doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2692-y.
21.
FrulioNLaumonierHCarteretTLaurentCMaireFBalabaudC. Evaluation of liver tumors using acoustic radiation force impulse elastography and correlation with histologic data. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:121-30.
22.
BruixJShermanM. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005;42:1208-36. doi:10.1002/hep.20933.
23.
YingLLinXXieZLTangFYHuYPShiKQ. Clinical utility of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for identification of malignant liver lesions: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:2798-805. doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2540-0
