A recently-developed ultrasonic technique for measuring elastic properties of vascular tissue is evaluated using computer simulations, phantom and in vivo human measurements. A time sequence of displacement images is measured over the cardiac cycle to describe the spatial and temporal patterns of deformation surrounding arteries. This information is combined with a mathematical model to estimate an elastic modulus. Computer simulations of ultrasonic echo data from deformed tissues are analyzed to define a signal processing approach. Measurements in flow phantoms, with and without vessel-simulating channel walls, provide an assessment of the accuracy and precision of this technique for vascular elasticity measurements. Finally, preliminary results for the stiffness index (β) in a study group of healthy human volunteers are compared with previously reported data. We find that careful measurement technique is required to control measurement variability.
BerneRMLevyMN. The Circuitry, Physiology (Mosby Inc., St. Louis, 1998).
2.
DobrinPB. Physiology of arteries and the pathophysiology of arterial disease: a mechanical perspective, in GiordanoJM, The Basic Science of Vascular Surgery (Mount Kisco, Futura Publishing Company Inc, 1988).
3.
McVeighGEHamiltonPKMorganDR. Evaluation of mechanical arterial properties: clinical, experimental and therapeutic aspects, Clin Sci102, 51–67 (2003).
4.
FungYC, Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993).
5.
KawasakiTSasayamaSYagiSAsakawaTHiraiT. Non-invasive assessment of the age related changes in stiffness of major branches of human arteries, Cardiovasc Res21, 678–687 (1987).
6.
WolinskyHGlagovS. Structural basis for the static mechanical properties of the aortic media, Circ Res14, 400–413 (1964).
7.
ArmentanoRLBarraJGLevensonJSimonAPichelRH. Arterial wall mechanics in conscious dogs: assessment of viscous, inertial, and elastic moduli to characterize aortic wall behavior, Circ Res76, 468–478 (1995).
8.
BankAJWangHHolteJEMullenKShammasRKuboSH. Contribution of collagen, elastin, and smooth muscle to in vivo human brachial artery wall stress and elastic modulus, Circulation94, 3263–3270 (1996).
9.
ImuraTYamamotoKKanamoriKMikamiTYasudaH. Non-invasive ultrasonic measurement of the elastic properties of the human abdominal aorta, Cardiovasc Res20, 208–214 (1986).
10.
RenemanRSvan MerodeTHickPMuytjensAMMHoeksAPG. Age-related changes in carotid artery wall properties in men, Ultrasound Med Biol12, 465–471 (1986).
11.
HoeksAPGBrandsPJWilligersJMRenemanRS. Non-invasive measurement of mechanical properties of arteries in health and disease, in Proc Instn Mech Engrs213, pp. 195–202 (1999).
12.
ErikssonAGreiffELoupasTPerssonMPesqueP. Arterial pulse wave velocity with tissue pulse Doppler imaging, Ultrasound Med Biol28, 571–580 (2002).
13.
RabbenSIBjærumSSørhusVTorpH. Ultrasound-based vessel wall tracking: an auto-correlation technique with RF center frequency estimation, Ultrasound Med Biol28, 507–517 (2002).
14.
MaiJJInsanaMF. Strain imaging of internal deformation, Ultrasound Med Biol28, 1475–1484 (2002).
15.
VolterraEGainesJH. Advanced Strength of Materials (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1971).
16.
SaadaAS. Elasticity: Theory and Applications (Pergamon Press, New York, 1974).
17.
de KorteCLCéspedesEIvan der SteenAFWLancéeCT. Intravascular elasticity imaging using ultrasound: feasibility studies in phantoms, Ultrasound Med Biol23, 735–746 (1997).
18.
LeeCSTarbellJM. Wall shear rate distribution in an abdominal aortic bifurcation model: effects of vessel compliance and phase angle between pressure and flow waveforms, J Biomech Eng119, 333–342 (1997).
19.
KargelChTrummerBPlevnikGPellot-BarakatCMaiJJInsanaMF. Is Ultrasonic imaging a sensitive indicator of spatially varying elastic anisotropy? in Proc IEEE Ultrasonic Symp2, pp. 1659–1662 (2001).
20.
PetersonLHJensenREParnellJ. Mechanical properties of arteries in vivo, Circ Res8, 622–639 (1960).
21.
LehmannED. Terminology for the definition of arterial elastic properties, Path Biol47, 656–664 (1999).
22.
BergelDH. Arterial viscoelasticity, in AttingerEO. Pulsatile Blood Flow (McGraw-Hill, London1964).
23.
TanakaTTFungYC. Elastic and inelastic properties of the canine aorta and their variation along the aortic tree, J Biomech7, 357–370 (1974).
24.
FungYC. Elasticity of soft tissues in simple elongation, Amer J Physiol28, 1532–1544 (1967).
25.
ChaturvediPInsanaMFHallTJ. 2D companding for noise reduction in strain imaging, IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Contr45, 179–191 (1998).
26.
InsanaMFMyersKJGrossmanLW. Signal modeling for tissue characterization. in SonkaMFitzpatrickJM, ed. Handbook of Medical Imaging: Volume 2, Medical Image Processing and Analysis515:565 (SPIE Press, Washington, DC, 2000).
27.
MadsenELZagzebskiJABanjavicRAJutilaRE. Tissue mimicking materials for ultrasound phantoms, Med Phys5, 391–394 (1978).
28.
HallTJBilgenMInsanaMFKrouskopTA. Phantom materials for elastography, IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Contr44, 1355–1365 (1997).
29.
SalonenRHaapanenASalonenJT. Measurement of intima-media thickness of common carotid arteries with high-resolution B-mode ultrasonography: inter-and intra-observer variability, Ultrasound Med Biol17, 225–230 (1991).
30.
CelermajerDSSorensenKEGoochVM, Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet7(340), 1111–1115 (1992).
31.
HansenF.MangellP.SonessonB.LanneT.. Diameter and compliance in the human common carotid artery—variations with age and sex, Ultrasound Med Biol21, 1–9 (1995).
32.
RemingtonJWWoodEH. Formation of peripheral pulse contour in man, J Appl Physiol9, 433–442 (1956).
33.
BoutouyriePLacolleyPLaurentS, Intrinsic modifications of the brachial and radial arteries in hypertensive humans, Clin Invest Med17, 97–106 (1994).
34.
BiceranoJ. Prediction of Polymer Properties, 2nd ed. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996).
35.
LupottiFAde KorteCLMastikFvan der SteenAFW. Dynamic noise correction for IVUS quantitative volume blood flow: methods and numerical validation, Ultrasound Med Biol28, 1053–1060 (2002).
36.
HoeksAPGArtsTGJBrandsPJRenemanRS. Processing scheme for velocity estimation using ultrasound RF cross correlation techniques, Eur J Ultrasound1, 171–182 (1994).
37.
CéspedesEIOphirJAlamSK. The combined effect of signal decorrelation and random noise on the variance of time delay estimation, IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Contr44, 220–225 (1997).
38.
SonkaMLiangWLauerRM. Automated analysis of brachial ultrasound image sequences: early detection of cardiovascular disease via surrogates of endothelial function, IEEE Trans Med Imag21, 1271–1279 (2002).
39.
WeidingerFFrickMAlberHFUlmerHSchwarzacherSPPachingerO. Association of wall thickness of the brachial artery measured with high-resolution ultrasound with risk factors and coronary artery disease, Amer J Cardiol89, 1025–1029 (2002).
40.
AndersonTJUehataAGerhardMD, Close relation of endothelial function in the human coronary and peripheral circulations, J Amer Coll Cardiol26, 1235–1241 (1995).
41.
KuvinJTPatelARSlineyKA, Peripheral vascular endothelial function testing as a noninvasive indicator of coronary artery disease, J Amer Coll Cardiol38, 1843–1849 (2001).
42.
CorrettiMCAndersonTJBenjaminEJ, Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery: a report of the International Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force, J Amer Coll Cardiol39, 257–265 (2002).
43.
KinlaySCreagerMAFukumotoM, Endothelium-derived nitric oxide regulates arterial elasticity in human arteries in vivo, Hypertension38, 1049–1053 (2001).
