We propose an algorithm that deals with broadband ultrasonic signals acquired in the near-field domain using probes close to the skin. This technique is designed for diffraction tomography of compact support objects interrogated by spherical waves (small transducers). It is an approximate inversion procedure in the Born approximation based on elliptical backprojection. Near-field imaging is enhanced by reducing the geometrical distortion observed on standard tomography. Numerical tests based on finite difference time domain (FDTD) simulations of data scattered by a tissue-like phantom are given.
SmithS. W.WagnerR. F.SandrikJ. M.LopezH., Low contrast detectability and contrast/detail analysis in medical ultrasound, IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason30, 164–173 (1983).
2.
VilkomersonD.GreenleafJ.DuttV., Towards a resolution metric for medical ultrasonic imaging, in Proc. IEEE Ultrason. Symp. pp. 1405–1410 (1995).
3.
JohnsonR., Contrast response analysis for medical ultrasonic imaging, IIEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferro. Freq. Contr.44, 805–809 (1997).
4.
NortonS. J.LinzerM., Ultrasonic reflectivity imaging in three dimensions: reconstruction with spherical transducer arrays, Ultrason. Imag.1, 210–231 (1979).
5.
WittenA.TuggleJ.WaagR. C., A practical approach to ultrasonic imaging using diffraction tomography, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.83 (1988).
6.
LadasK. T.DevaneyA. J., Application of an ART algorithm in an experimental study of ultrasonic diffraction tomography, Ultrason. Imag.15, 48–58 (1993).
7.
LefebvreJ. P., La tomographie ultrasonore en reflexion, J. D'Acoustique1, 123–128 (1988).
8.
ThomeniusK. E., Evolution of ultrasound beamformer, in Proc. IEEE Ultrason. Symp. pp. 1615–1622 (1996).
9.
KossofG.FryE. K.JellinsJ., Average velocity of ultrasound in the human female breast, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer.53, 1730–1736 (1973).
10.
FosterF. S.HuntJ. W., Transmission of ultrasound beams through human tissue- focusing and attenuation studies, Ultras. Med. Biol.3, 257–268 (1979).
11.
AindrowJ. D.ChiversR. C., Ultrasonic wave fluctuations through tissue: an experimental pilot study, Ultrasonics26, 90–101 (1988).
12.
HinkelmanL. M.Lai LiuD.WaagR. C.ZhuQ.SteinbergB., Measurement and correction of ultrasonic pulse distortion produced by the human breast, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.97, 1958–1969 (1995).
13.
GauthierO., Two-dimensional nonlinear inversion of seismic waveforms, Geophysics51, 1387–1403 (1986).
14.
NattererF.WübbelingF., Mathematical methods in image reconstruction, in Proc. SIAM2001.
15.
NolletG., Seismic Tomography, pp. 135–157 (Reidel, 1987).
16.
JohnsonS. A.StengerF.WilcoxC.BallJ.BerggrenM. J., Wave equation and inverse solution for soft tissue, in Acoust. Imaging 11, pp. 409–424 (Plenum Press, New York, 1982).
17.
NortonS. J.LinzerM., Ultrasonic reflectivity imaging in three dimensions: exact inverse scattering solutions for plane, cylindrical, and spherical apertures, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engin28, 202–220 (1981).
BeylkinG.BurridgeR., Linearized Inverse Scattering Problems in Acoustics and Elasticity, Wave motion, 12 (Elsevier Science, 1990).
24.
BerengerJ. P., A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves, J. Comp. Phys.114, 185–200 (1994).
25.
YuanX.BorupD.WiskinJ.BerggerenM.EidensR.JohnsonS. A., Formulation and validation of Berenger's PML absorbing boundary for the FDTD simulation of acoustic scattering, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferro. Freq. Contr.44, 816–822 (1997).
