The formal education of universities on the one hand, and popular education on the other, have been generally understood as two ends of a spectrum in the field of education. Despite these opposing trajectories, in the past two decades novel forms of social movement–university relationships have emerged, with notable yet understudied models from Latin America.
Purpose:
This article examines whether and how higher education institutions can value knowledge based on the experiences of everyday citizens from the most marginalized groups. In what ways have social movements navigated universities? In what ways can social movements and university actors develop relationships to meet activists’ goals and promote more inclusive universities?
Research Design:
Drawing from ethnographic research and interviews, we analyze three examples of social movement–university relationships: (1) the National Program for Education in Areas of Agrarian Reform (PRONERA) through the Landless Workers’ Movement (MST); (2) the Popular University of Social Movements (UPMS); and (3) Emancipa University, born from Brazil’s largest popular education movement today. These Brazilian cases build on long histories of movement organizing in Latin America, alongside universities that have expanded access, yet often without conditions for “permanence,” belonging, and emancipatory education for the most marginalized students.
Conclusions:
We argue that it is possible for universities to uphold popular knowledge and for social movements to navigate universities to meet their goals. This article offers lessons for understanding how social movements navigate autonomy along with institutional ties, and where universities broaden notions of who the university is for and what kinds of knowledge can and should be upheld. The cases illustrate working within, outside of, and toward the university. These pathways show how the university shifts from “site of struggle” to “complicit in struggle,” in which movements set the terms for meaningful engagement with universities and create educational alternatives aligned with goals of social transformation.
AcevedoF. (ed.). (2020). Expansión de la educación superior en América. 2º Foro Educativo Regional.
2.
ArmstrongE.BernsteinM. (2008). Culture, power and institutions: A multi-institutional politics approach to social movements. Sociological Theory, 26(1), 74–99.
3.
BenzaquenJ. F. (2012). Universidade dos movimentos sociais: Apostas em saberes, práticas e sujeitos descoloniais [PhD thesis]. Universidade de Coimbra.
4.
BiondiM. (2014). The Black revolution on campus. University of California Press.
5.
BoggsA.MitchellN. (2018). Critical university studies and the crisis consensus. Feminist Studies, 44(2), 432–463.
6.
BourdieuP.PasseronJ. C. (1977 [1970]). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage.
7.
BragaR. (2024). The emancipation network: Discovering anti-capitalist institutions within Brazilian capitalism. In BurawoyM.SeidmanG. (Eds.), Engaging Erik Olin Wright: Between class analysis and real utopias (pp. 178–198). Verso Books.
8.
BrintS.KarabelJ. (1989). The diverted dream: Community colleges and the promise of educational opportunity in America, 1900–1985. Oxford University Press.
9.
BurawoyM.EbyM.GeptsT.GermainJ.PasquinelliN.Torres CarpioE. (2024). Introduction: Laboring in the extractive university. Work and Occupations, 51(1), 3–24.
10.
CaldartR. S.AlentejanoP.FrigottoG. (Eds.). (2012). Dicionário da educação do campo. Expressão Popular.
11.
ChoudryA.VallyS. (2020). The university and social justice: Struggles across the globe. Pluto Press.
12.
Da TrindadeA. (2024). Utopian thinking in higher education and its relationship with social movements: Reshaping societal roles to build alternative worlds [PhD thesis]. University of Cambridge.
13.
Da TrindadeA.MerladetF. A. D. (2023). The case of the popular university of social movements: Lessons on dialogue from and for humanisation and the transformation of institutions. Journal of Dialogue Studies, 11, 46–76.
14.
EstevaG. (2014). La libertad de aprender. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación Del Profesorado, 80(28.2), 39–50.
15.
FlyvbjergB. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge University Press.
16.
FrankD. J.MeyerJ. W. (2020). The university and the global knowledge society. Princeton University Press.
17.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
18.
GadottiM. (2003). Universidade Popular dos Movimentos Sociais: Breve história de um sonho possível. Democracia Viva, 14, 78–83.
GirouxH. A. (2020). Neoliberalism’s war on higher education (2nd ed.). Haymarket Books.
21.
HammondJ. L. (2014). Mística, meaning and popular education in the Brazilian landless workers movement. Interface, 6(20), 372–391.
22.
HarneyS.MotenF. (2013). The undercommons: Fugitive planning and Black study. Minor Compos.
23.
HartG. (2006), Denaturalizing dispossession: Critical ethnography in the age of resurgent imperialism. Antipode, 38, 977–1004.
24.
Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária (INCRA). (2015). II PNERA: Relatório da iI pesquisa nacional sobre a educação na reforma agrária. INCRA.
25.
Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira (INEP). (2024). Census da Educação Superior. Diretoria de Estatísticas Educacionais, Ministério da Educação.
26.
JessopB. (2018). On academic capitalism. Critical Policy Studies, 12(1), 104–109.
27.
KaneL. (2010). Community development: Learning from popular education in Latin America. Community Development Journal, 45(3), 276–286.
ManceboD.Silva JúniorJ. (2015). Expansão da educação superior e a reforma da rede federal de educação professional. Revista Educação em Questão, 51(37), 73–94.
30.
MerladetF. A. D. (2020). Pedagogia da articulação: A universidade popular dos movimentos sociais e a ecologia de saberes na prática [PhD thesis]. Universidade de Coimbra.
31.
MeyerhoffE. (2019). Beyond education: Radical studying for another world. University of Minnesota Press.
32.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.
33.
MottaS. C. (2017). Emancipation in Latin America: On the pedagogical turn. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 36(1), 5–20.
34.
MustaffaJ. B.DawsonC. (2021). Racial capitalism and the Black student loan debt crisis. Teachers College Record, 123(6), 1–28.
35.
NashM. A. (2019). Entangled pasts: Land-grant colleges and American Indian dispossession. History of Education Quarterly, 59(4), 437–467.
36.
NieszT.KororaA. M.WalkuskiC. B.FootR. E. (2018). Social movements and educational research: Toward a united field of scholarship. Teachers College Record, 120(3), 1–41.
37.
PaschelT. (2016). Becoming Black political subjects: Globalization, social movements and the making of ethno-racial rights in Colombia and Brazil. Princeton University Press.
38.
PatelL. (2021). No study without struggle: Confronting settler colonialism in higher education. Beacon Press.
39.
RojasF. (2007). From Black power to Black studies: How a radical social movement became an academic discipline. Johns Hopkins University Press.
SantosB. de S. (2006). A universidade popular dos movimentos sociais. In SantosB. de S. (Ed.), A gramática do tempo: Para uma nova cultura política (Vol. 4, pp. 155–165). Edições Afrontamento.
42.
SinghV.VoraN. (2023). Critical university studies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 52, 39–54.
43.
SlaughterS.RhoadesG. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press.
44.
SguissardiV. (2015). Educação superior no Brasil: Democratização ou massificação mercantil?Educação & Sociedade, Campinas, 36(133), 867–889.
45.
StevensM. L.ArmstrongE. A.ArumR. (2008). Sieve, incubator, temple, hub: Empirical and theoretical advances in the sociology of higher education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 127–151.
46.
TarlauR.(2015). How do new critical pedagogies develop? Educational innovation, social change, and landless workers in Brazil. Teachers College Record, 117(11), 1–36.
47.
TarlauR. (2019). Occupying schools, occupying land: How the landless workers movement transformed Brazilian education. Oxford University Press.
48.
TarlauR. (2021). Contentious cogovernance and prefiguration: A framework for analyzing social movement–state relations in public education. Educational Researcher, 50(8), 527–536.
49.
TaylorA. Y. (2022). Co-authoring speeches, constructing collective identity: Brazilian youth movements from ethnographic and discursive analytic perspectives. Ethnography & Education, 17(3), 293–313.
50.
TaylorA. Y. (2023). Articulating youth: The politics and practices of Brazilian youth movements [PhD dissertation]. University of California, Berkeley.
51.
TaylorA. Y.GordonC. D.PereiraA. A. (2023). On the matter of Black lives across the Americas: Historical, transnational, and educational perspectives on anti-racist struggles in Brazil and the U.S. Comparative Education Review, 67(S1), 25–45.
52.
TillyC. (1999). From interactions to outcomes in social movements. In: GuigniM.McAdamD.TillyC. (Eds.), How social movements matter (pp. 353–370). University of Minnesota Press.
53.
TrowM. (2007). Reflections on the transition from elite to mass to universal access: Forms and phases of higher education in modern societies since WWII. In: ForestJames J. F.AltbachPhilip G. (Eds.), The international handbook of higher education (pp. 243–280). Springer Netherlands.
54.
Universidade Popular dos Movimentos Sociais (UPMS). (2012a). Charter of principles of the Popular University of Social Movements. Author.
55.
Universidade Popular dos Movimentos Sociais (UPMS).(2012b). Methodological guidelines for the Popular University of Social Movements (UPMS). Author
56.
Universidade Popular dos Movimentos Sociais (UPMS). (2021). What is UPMS. Author.
57.
VasconcelosJ. S.RosárioN.RibeiroT.CordeiroP. M. (2024). Popular knowledge as popular power: Struggle and strategy of the Emancipa popular education movement in Brazil. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 22(1), 122–137.
58.
VeigaI. P. A. (2003). Inovações e projeto politico-pedagógico: Uma relação regulatória ou emancipatória?Cadernos Cedes, Campinas, 23(61), 267–281.
59.
WalshC. (ed.). (2017). Pedagogías decoloniales: Prácticas insurgentes de resistir, (re)existir y (re)vivir—Tomo II. Ediciones Abya-Yala.
60.
WhitakerF. (2000). Fórum social mundial: Origens e objetivos. Correio da Cidadania.
Williamson-LottJ. (2018). Jim Crow campus: Higher education and the struggle for a new Southern social order. Teachers College Press.
63.
WolfordW. (2016). The casa and the causa: Institutional histories and cultural politics in Brazilian land reform. Latin American Research Review, 51(4), 24–42.
