During the first months of the COVID pandemic, teachers were forced to move to online instruction without the appropriate resources. They resorted to social media to gather expertise and ideas. This study is grounded in an analysis of the questions posed by K–12 teachers on popular Facebook groups.
Purpose, Objective, Research Question, or Focus of Study:
The authors argue that a close analysis of what K–12 educators are asking and wondering about in online teacher groups at a moment in which much of what they know and trust has been disrupted can be generative as a novel feedback loop to engage in conversations about some common practices in teacher education. Specifically, they ask: How can an analysis of questions posed by educators on public Facebook groups in the early pandemic enter into a productive conversation with teacher education programs beyond the specificities of that context?
Research Design:
The study performs a thematic analysis based on categories that were inductively coded from 752 questions posed between March and June 2020 by educators in the three most popular public Facebook groups dedicated exclusively to K–12 teaching during the pandemic. The goal is to consider the underlying assumptions and ideas embedded in the questions being asked in these groups, and to place them within the context of the authors’ political understandings of the role of teacher education.
Conclusions or Recommendations:
Four themes emerged from the analysis: an expanding notion of community, tensions in the understandings of “context,” new positionings of expertise, and a questioning of what counts as legitimate schooling. The themes led to a need for teacher education programs to always consider their students’ professional identities as collectively constructed and to find ways to disrupt universal models of the mind. The authors also invite programs to rethink the location of expertise by taking into account the practices that young teachers are already engaged in when seeking professional knowledge. This opening could potentially lead to perhaps the hardest thing to do within teacher education programs: to provide the conditions to reimagine schooling.
AguilarS. J.RosenbergJ. M.GreenhalghS. P.FüttererT.LishinskiA.FischerC. (2021). A different experience in a different moment? Teachers’ social media use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. AERA Open, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211063898
2.
AndersonL.StillmanJ. (2011). Student teaching for a specialized view of professional practice? Opportunities to learn in and for urban, high-needs schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(5), 446–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111412052
3.
AndreasenA. R. (1995). Marketing social change: Changing behavior to promote health, social development, and the environment (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.
4.
AuW. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2010.521261
5.
AuW.FerrareJ. J. (Eds.). (2015). Mapping corporate education reform: Power and policy networks in the neoliberal state. Routledge.
6.
Bell-RobertsonC. G. (2014). “Staying on our feet”: Novice music teachers’ sharing of emotions and experiences within an online community. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61(4), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429413508410
7.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
8.
BrittV. G.PaulusT. (2016) “Beyond the fours walls of my building”: A case study of #Edchat as a community of practice. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(1), 48–59.
9.
CarpenterJ. P.GreenT. D. (2017). Mobile instant messaging for professional learning: Educators’ perspectives on and uses of Voxer. Teaching and Teacher Education, 68, 53–67.
10.
CheongC.Coldwell-NeilsonJ.MacCallumK.LuoT.ScimeA. (Eds.). (2021). COVID-19 and education: Learning and teaching in a pandemic-constrained environment. Informing Science.
11.
CinkaraE.ArslanF. Y. (2017). Content analysis of a Facebook group as a form of mentoring for EFL teachers. English Language Teaching, 10(3), 40–53.
12.
ColmenaresE. E. (2021). Exploring student teachers’ ‘stuck moments’: Affect[ing] the theory-practice gap in social justice teacher education. Professional Development in Education, 47(2–3), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1879229
EmdinC. (2016). For white folks who teach in the hood. . . And the rest of y’all too: Reality pedagogy and urban education. Beacon Press.
15.
FendlerL. (2001). Educating flexible souls. The construction of subjectivity through developmentality and interaction. In HultqvistK.DahlbergG. (Eds.), Governing the child in the new millennium (pp. 119–142). Psychology Press.
FriedrichD. (2014). “We brought it upon ourselves”: University-based teacher education and the emergence of boot-camp-style routes to teacher certification. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(2). http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1193
19.
GalvinS.GreenhowC. (2020). Educational networking: A novel discipline for improved K–12 learning based on social networks. In Peña-AyalaA. (Ed.), Educational networking (pp. 3–41). Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29973-6_1
20.
GaoF.LiL. (2017). Examining a one-hour synchronous chat in a microblogging-based professional development community. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12384
21.
GreenhalghS. P.KoehlerM. J. (2017). 28 days later: Twitter hashtags as “just in time” teacher professional development. TechTrends, 61(3), 273–281.
22.
GreenhowC.GalvinS. M.BrandonD. L.AskariE. (2020). A decade of research on K–12 teaching and teacher learning with social media: Insights on the state of the field. Teachers College Record, 122(6), 1–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200602
23.
GreenhowC.Staudt WilletK. B.GalvinS. (2021). Inquiring tweets want to know: #Edchat supports for #RemoteTeaching during COVID-19. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1434–1454. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13097
24.
HartshorneR.BaumgartnerE.Kaplan-RakowskiR.MouzaC.FerdigR. E. (2020). Special issue editorial: Preservice and inservice professional development during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 137–147.
IredaleA.StaplefordK.TremayneD.FarrellL.HolbreyC.Sheridan-RossJ. (2020). A review and synthesis of the use of social media in initial teacher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1693422
27.
JacquesL.ShrubbR. (2020). PK–12 educators’ requests for teaching during a pandemic. EdMedia + Innovate Learning, 56–60. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/217284/
KretchmarK.ZeichnerK. (2019). Teacher prep 3.0: A vision for teacher education to impact social transformation. In: McNamaraO.McNicollJ. (Eds.), Poverty discourses in teacher education (pp. 44–60). Routledge.
30.
KrutkaD. G.CarpenterJ. P. (2016). Participatory learning through social media: How and why social studies educators use Twitter. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 16(1), 38–59.
31.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. Wiley.
32.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1999). Preparing teachers for diverse student populations: A Critical Race Theory perspective. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 211–247. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X024001211
33.
LaveJ. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In ResnikL. B.LevineJ. M.TeasleyS. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–82). American Psychological Association.
34.
LiljekvistY. E.RandahlA.-C.Van BommelJ.Olin-SchellerC. (2021). Facebook for professional development: Pedagogical content knowledge in the centre of teachers’ online communities. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(5), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1754900
35.
LortieD. C. (1977). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.
36.
LoutzenheiserL.HeerK. (2017). Unsettling habitual ways of teacher education through ‘post-theories’ of teacher agency. In ClandininD. J.HusuJ. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 317–332). SAGE.
37.
MawhinneyL. (2008). Laugh so you don’t cry: Teachers combating isolation in schools through humour and social support. Ethnography and Education, 3(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457820802062466
38.
McNallyJ.BlakeA.ReidA. (2009). The informal learning of new teachers in school. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(4), 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620910954210
39.
MirraN.MorrellE. (2011). Teachers as civic agents: Toward a critical democratic theory of urban teacher development. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111409417
40.
NelimarkkaM.LeinonenT.DurallE.DeanP. (2021). Facebook is not a silver bullet for teachers’ professional development: Anatomy of an eight-year-old social-media community. Computers & Education, 173, 104269.
41.
NobleA.McQuillanP.Littenberg-TobiasJ. (2016). “A lifelong classroom”: Social studies educators’ engagement with professional learning networks on Twitter. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 24(2), 187–213.
42.
PaulsenT. H.AndersonR. G.TweetenJ. F. (2015). Concerns expressed by agricultural education preservice teachers in a Twitter-based electronic community of practice. Journal of Agricultural Education, 56(3), 210–226.
RanieriM.MancaS.FiniA. (2012). Why (and how) do teachers engage in social networks? An exploratory study of professional use of Facebook and its implications for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 754–769.
45.
Rosell-AguilarF. (2018). Twitter: A professional development and community of practice tool for teachers. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2018(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.452
46.
RossC. R.ManingerR. M.LaPrairieK. N.SullivanS. (2015). The use of Twitter in the creation of educational professional learning opportunities. Administrative Issues Journal, 5(1), 6.
47.
ShapiroS. (2010). Revisiting the teachers’ lounge: Reflections on emotional experience and teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 616–621.
48.
TorphyK.LiuY.HuS.ChenZ. (2020a). Sources of professional support: Patterns of teachers’ curation of instructional resources in social media. American Journal of Education, 127(1), 13–47.
49.
TorphyK.LiuY.HuS.ChenZ. (2020b). Teachers turning to teachers: Teacherpreneurial behaviors in social media. American Journal of Education, 127(1), 49–76.
50.
TrustT. (2015). Deconstructing an online community of practice: Teachers’ actions in the Edmodo math subject community. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 31(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2015.1011293
51.
TrustT.KrutkaD. G.CarpenterJ. P. (2016). “Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102, 15–34.
52.
TyackD. B.CubanL. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Harvard University Press.
53.
van BommelJ.RandahlA.-C.LiljekvistY.RuthvenK. (2020). Tracing teachers’ transformation of knowledge in social media. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 102958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102958
54.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2–3.
55.
ZeichnerK.PayneK. A.BraykoK. (2015). Democratizing teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 122–135. Facebook Groups
