New York City is one of the most segregated school districts in the country, but between 2012 and 2021, school integration moved from a marginal to a central education policy. Existing narratives have emphasized the efforts of parents and school and political leaders, with less attention given to the significance of citywide coalitions of activists, especially youth activists.
Purpose:
We examine how grassroots activists contributed to advancing school integration policy, and the opportunities and challenges that resulted, through urban regime theory, and specifically civic capacity, which highlights how various constituencies build a shared agenda for policy change.
Research Design:
Working in partnership with four youth interviewers at two integration activist organizations, we conducted 72 semi-structured interviews with New York City student, parent, and community activists. We also observed 36 hours of public meeting observations and collected publicly available documents, including 360 newspaper articles and policy documents, to triangulate our findings.
Conclusions:
We found that activist coalitions made progress in developing civic capacity through increased collaboration among diverse stakeholders, notably youth, toward a shared definition of integration. However, growing tensions with rival coalitions and the fragmented political landscape of NYC limited the strength and durability of civic capacity.
BogerJ. C.OrfieldG. (Eds.). (2009). School resegregation: Must the South turn back?University of North Carolina Press.
4.
BoozerM.KruegerA.WolkonS. (1992). Race and school quality sinceBrown vs. Board of Education. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics, 1992, 269–338.
5.
Bureaucrats for Black Lives. (2020). Open letter to the chancellor. http://b4bl.nyc/
6.
CastilloE.MakrisM. V.DebsM. (2021). Integration versus meritocracy? Competing educational goals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aera Open, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211065716
DeBrayE.GroomsA. (2012). High civic capacity, low demand for integration: Racial demographic transition in suburban Atlanta. In OrfieldG.FrankenbergE. (Eds.), The resegregation of suburban schools: A hidden crisis in American education (pp. 163–184). Harvard Education Press.
15.
De JesúsA.PérezM. (2009). From community control to consent decree: Puerto Ricans organizing for education and language rights in 1960s and ‘70s New York City. Centro Journal, 21(2), 7–31.
16.
DelmontM. F. (2016). Why busing failed: Race, media, and the national resistance to school desegregation. University of California Press.
17.
De SchweinitzR. (2009) If we could change the world: Young people and America’s long struggle for racial equality. University of North Carolina Press.
18.
DevlinR. (2018). A girl stands at the door: The generation of young women who desegregated America’s schools. Basic Books.
DiemS.FrankenbergE. (2013). The politics of diversity: Integration in an era of political and legal uncertainty. Teachers College Record, 115(11), 1–30.
EricksonA. T. (2016). Making the unequal metropolis. University of Chicago Press.
23.
EricksonA. T.MorrellE. (Eds.). (2019). Educating Harlem: A century of schooling and resistance in a Black community. Columbia University Press.
24.
FinniganK. S.HolmeJ. J. (2018). The political geography of inter-district integration. Peabody Journal of Education, 93(4), 367–377.
25.
FranklinV. P. (2021). The young crusaders: The untold story of the children and teenagers who galvanized the civil rights movement. Beacon Press.
26.
FreidusA. (2019). “A great school benefits us all”: Advantaged parents and the gentrification of an urban public school. Urban Education, 54(8), 1121–1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916636656
27.
FreidusA.NogueraP. (2015). From “good will” to “anachronism”: Racial discourse, shifting demographics, and the role of school desegregation in the public good. Humanity & Society, 39(4), 394–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597615601716
GoldE.SimonE.CucchiaraM.MitchellC.RifferM. (2007). A Philadelphia story: Building civic capacity for school reform in a privatizing system. Research for Action.
HenigJ. R. (1994). Rethinking school choice: Limits to the market metaphor. Princeton University Press.
36.
HenigJ. R.HulaR. C.OrrM.PedescleauxD. S. (1999). The color of school reform: Race, politics, and the challenge of urban education. Princeton University Press.
37.
HernándezL. E. (2017). Managing the brand: Racial politics, strategic messaging, and coalition-building efforts of charter management organizations. UC Berkeley. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2wr7q0wt
38.
HorsfordS. D. (2011). Learning in a burning house: Educational inequality, ideology, and (dis)integration. Teachers College Press.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2004). Landing on the wrong note: The price we paid forBrown. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 3–13.
48.
Loder-JacksonT. L. (2015). The sociopolitical context of education in post-civil rights Birmingham. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(3), 336–354.
49.
MaderN.HemphillC.AbbasQ. (2018). The paradox of choice: How school choice divides New York City’s elementary schools. The Center for New York City Affairs at The New School. http://www.centernyc.org/the-paradox-of-choice
OrfieldG.FrankenbergE. (2012). Educational delusions? Why choice can deepen inequality and how to make schools fair. University of California Press.
63.
ParkJ. J.LiuA. (2014). Interest convergence or divergence? A critical race analysis of Asian Americans, meritocracy, and critical mass in the affirmative action debate. Journal of Higher Education, 85(1), 36–64.
64.
PérezM. (2011). Two tales of one city: A political economy of the New York City public high school admissions process (Publication No. 3444338) [Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
ReardonS. F.GrewalE. T.KalogridesD.GreenbergE. (2012). Brownfades: The end of court-ordered school desegregation and the resegregation of American public schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31(4), 876–904. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21649
69.
RichardsM. P. (2020). The racial/ethnic and socioeconomic dynamics of public school district secession, 1995–2015. Teachers College Record, 122(5), n5.
70.
RodaA. (2015). Inequality in gifted and talented programs: Parental choices about status, school opportunity, and second-generation segregation. Palgrave Macmillan.
71.
RodaA. (2020). “Holding the line”: Investigating how urban school leaders’ respond to gentrification in New York City schools. Urban Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920959137
72.
RooksN. M. (2017). Cutting school: Privatization, segregation, and the end of public education. The New Press.
SchumakerK. (2019). Troublemakers: Students’ rights and racial justice in the long 1960s. New York University Press.
76.
ScottJ.DiMartinoC. (2009). Public education under new management: A typology of educational privatization applied to New York City’s restructuring. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(3), 432–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619560902973647
ShippsD. (2003). Pulling together: Civic capacity and urban school reform. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 841–878. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040004841
82.
Siegel-HawleyG.DiemS.FrankenbergE. (2018). The disintegration of Memphis-Shelby County, Tennessee: School district secession and local control in the 21st century. American Educational Research Journal, 55(4), 651–692.
83.
StoneC. N. (1998). Introduction: Urban education in political context. In StoneC. N. (Ed.), Changing urban education (pp. 1–20). University Press of Kansas.
Thompson DorseyD. N.Venzant ChambersT. T. (2014). Growing C-D-R (Cedar): Working the intersections of interest convergence and whiteness as property in the affirmative action legal debate. Race Ethnicity and Education, 17(1), 56–87.
