Rooted in the principles of Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR), this article explores how a team of youth community activists extended their coalition virtually to produce a bill of demands for structural social change in their city and its surrounding county.
Focus of Study:
Our inquiry focuses on how the youth’s dialectic goal of arriving at consensus (through debate fiercely, and intentionally, tied to the country’s own internal reckonings) loomed, uncomfortably at times, over the dialogic process of inviting youth from across the city to share experiences, exchange ideas, and build relationships.
Setting:
The youth’s coalitional work extended outward from the Yamacraw Center, a community literacy center and social justice organization based in a historic coastal city in the southern United States.
Participants:
The primary team, reported on here, was made up of eight youth researchers and two adult allies/co-researchers responsible for supporting youth as they engaged in YPAR.
Research Design:
Our study is a reflexive thematic analysis of the interplay between youth during 11 planning and organizing sessions.
Data Collection:
The data collected for this study are video digital Google Hangout meetings recorded over a five-month period.
Findings:
Our findings consider key strategies youth exhibited in coming together to hear one another, triage priorities, and carefully attend to the ways they needed to craft their arguments to be taken seriously.
Conclusions:
We highlight the importance of process in building youth capacity, detail discursive moves youth made to maintain critical momentum, and situate the project within a larger ethos that recognizes the immanent value of cultivating youth capacity to engage in fierce and humanizing exchanges with their peers in pursuit of collective progress.
AkomA. A.CammarotaJ.GinwrightS. (2008). Youthtopias: Towards a new paradigm of critical youth studies. Youth Media Reporter, 2(4), 1–30.
2.
AnyonY.KennedyH.DurbahnR.JensonJ. M. (2018). Youth-led participatory action research: Promoting youth voice and adult support in afterschool programs. Afterschool Matters, 27, 10–18.
BerlantL. G. (2011). Cruel optimism. Duke University Press.
5.
BertrandM. (2018). Youth participatory action research and possibilities for students of color in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(3), 366–395.
6.
BettencourtG. M. (2020). Embracing problems, processes, and contact zones: Using youth participatory action research to challenge adultism. Action Research, 18(2), 153–170.
7.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
8.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597.
9.
BurkeK. J.GreeneS.McKennaM. K. (2017). Youth voice, civic engagement and failure in participatory action research. The Urban Review, 49(4), 585–601.
10.
ButlerJ. (1987). Subjects of desire: Hegelian reflections in twentieth-century France. Columbia University Press.
11.
CammarotaJ.FineM. (Eds.). (2008). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. Routledge.
12.
CastroE. M.HernándezG. L.GillesJ. K. J.NovoaA.ClassT. N. G.Suárez-OrozcoC. (2021). “Everyone collaborated and came together”: The civic promise (and pitfalls) of YPAR for immigrant-origin students in an era of deportation. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 28(3), 427–439.
ColeyR. J.SumA. (2012). Fault lines in our democracy: Civic knowledge, voting behavior, and civic engagement in the United States. Educational Testing Service.
15.
CollinsP. H.BilgeS. (2020). Intersectionality. John Wiley & Sons.
16.
CookA. L.RuizB.KarterJ. (2019). “Liberation is a praxis”: Promoting college and career access through youth participatory action research. School Community Journal, 29(2), 203–224.
17.
de los RíosC. V.LópezJ.MorrellE. (2016). Critical ethnic studies in high school classrooms: Academic achievement via social action. In NogueraP.PierceJ.AhramR. (Eds.), Race, equity, and education (pp. 177–198). Springer, Cham.
18.
de los RíosC. V.MolinaA. (2020). Literacies of refuge: “Pidiendo posada” as ritual of justice. Journal of Literacy Research, 52(1), 32–54.
19.
DennisS. F. (2006). Seeing Hampton plantation: Race and gender in a South Carolina heritage landscape. In ScheinR. H. (Ed.), Landscape and race in the United States (pp. 73–94). Routledge.
20.
DolanT.ChristensB. D.LinC. (2015). Combining youth organizing and youth participatory action research to strengthen student voice in education reform. Teachers College Record, 117(13), 153–170.
21.
DumasM. J. (2018). Beginning and ending with Black suffering: A meditation on and against racial justice in education. In TuckE.YangK. W. (Eds.), Toward what justice: Describing diverse dreams of justice in education (pp. 29–45). Routledge.
22.
FehrmanD.SchutzA. (2011). Beyond the Catch-22 of school-based social action programs: Toward a more pragmatic approach for dealing with power. Democracy and Education, 19(1), 3.
23.
FineM. (2018). Just research in contentious times: Widening the methodological imagination. Teachers College Press.
24.
GinwrightS.CammarotaJ. (2007). Youth activism in the urban community: Learning critical civic praxis within community organizations. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(6), 693–710.
25.
GrandeS. (2018). Refusing the university. In TuckE.YangK. W. (Eds.), Toward what justice? (pp. 47–65). Routledge.
26.
GreenK. L.MoralesD. M.BettencourtG. M. (2020). Youth epistemologies to create a third space: A reclamation of learning in an English language arts classroom. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 19(3), 303–316.
27.
GutiérrezK. D.JohnsonP. (2017). Understanding identity sampling and cultural repertoires: Advancing learning in justice pedagogies. In ParisD.AlimH. S. (Eds.), Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world (pp. 247–260). Teachers College Press.
28.
HadleyH. L.BurkeK. J.WrightW. T. (2019). Opening spaces of restoration for youth through community-engaged critical literacy practices. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 19(1), 95–106.
29.
IrizarryJ. G.BrownT. M. (2014). Humanizing research in dehumanizing spaces: The challenges and opportunities of conducting participatory action research with youth in schools. In ParisD.WinnM. (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 63–80). Sage.
30.
KahneJ.WestheimerJ. (2006). The limits of political efficacy: Educating citizens for a democratic society. PS-Political Science and Politics, 39(2), 289–296.
31.
KaplanE. B. (2013). We live in the shadow: Inner-city kids tell their stories through photographs. Temple University Press.
32.
KeddieA. (2021). The difficulties of ‘action’ in Youth Participatory Action Research: Schoolifying YPAR in two elite settings. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 42(3), 381–393.
33.
KinlochV.San PedroT. (2014). The space between listening and storying: Foundations for projects in humanization. In ParisD.WinnM. (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 21–42). Sage.
34.
KirshnerB. (2008). Guided participation in three youth activism organizations: Facilitation, apprenticeship, and joint work. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 60–101.
35.
KirshnerB. (2010). Productive tensions in youth participatory action research. Teachers College Record, 112(13), 238–251.
36.
LautzenheiserD. K.KellyA. P.MillerC. (2011). Contested curriculum: How teachers and citizens view civics education. Policy Brief 1. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
37.
LoveB. (2019). We want to do more than survive: Abolitionist teaching and the pursuit of educational freedom. Beacon Press.
MillerR. E. (1994). Fault lines in the contact zone. College English, 56(4), 389–408. doi:10.2307/378334
41.
MinklerM. (2004). Ethical challenges for the “outside” researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Education and Behavior, 31(6), 684–697.
42.
MirraN.GarciaA.MorrellE. (2015). Doing youth participatory action research: Transforming inquiry with researchers, educators, and students. Routledge.
43.
MouffeC. (1996). Radical democracy or liberal democracy? In TrendD. (Ed.), Radical democracy: Identity, citizenship, and the state (pp. 19–26). Routledge.
RubinB. C.AyalaJ.ZaalM. (2017). Authenticity, aims and authority: Navigating youth participatory action research in the classroom. Curriculum Inquiry, 47(2), 175–194.
49.
San PedroT. (2013). Understanding youth cultures, stories, and resistances in the urban southwest: Innovations and implications of a Native American literature classroom. UMI 3558673. ProQuest Digital Dissertations.
50.
Torney-PurtaJ.LopezS. V. (2006). Developing citizenship competencies from kindergarten through grade 12: A background paper for policymakers and educators. Education Commission of the States (NJ3).
51.
TorreM. E.FineM.AlexanderN.BillupsA. B.BlandingY.GenaoE.MarboeE.SalahT.UrdangK. (2008). Participatory action research in the contact zone. In CammarotaJ.FineM. (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion (pp. 23–44). Routledge.
52.
TuckE.YangK. W. (Eds.). (2018). Toward what justice?: Describing diverse dreams of justice in education. Routledge.
53.
Van der PloegP.GuérinL. (2016). Questioning participation and solidarity as goals of citizenship education. Critical Review, 28(2), 248–264.
54.
WegerifR. (2008). Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological assumptions in research on educational dialogue. British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 347–361.
55.
WinnM. T. (2011). Girl time: Literacy, justice, and the school-to-prison pipeline. Teachers College Press.
56.
WinnM. T.UbilesJ. R. (2011). Worthy witnessing: Collaborative research in urban classrooms. In BallA.TysonC. (Eds.), Studying diversity in teacher education (pp. 295–308). Rowman & Littlefield.
57.
WongC.PenaC. (2017). Policing and performing culture: Rethinking ‘culture’ and the role of the arts in culturally sustaining pedagogies. In ParisD.AlimH. S. (Eds.), Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world (pp. 117–138). Teachers College Press.
58.
WrightW. T.HadleyH. L.BurkeK. (2020). “No. We should do it”: Youth training youth in activist research methods. The Urban Review, 52(4), 1–22.
