U.S. higher education governing boards have received enhanced public attention over the last decade in response to national media coverage and emerging governance scholarship. Despite the rise of attention on this topic and the maintained influence of board decisions, governing boards remain one of the least understood aspects of higher education.
Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study:
The qualifications required for board member service in higher education are a particularly understudied aspect of boards. Given the limited knowledge of board qualifications, our study aimed to understand what (if any) were the known requirements for service on U.S. public boards of higher education.
Setting:
A total of 95 public board bylaws representing at least one institution from each state were examined for any mention of the requirements or qualifications for the trusteeship. Both standalone institutional boards and system boards were investigated to account for the diversity of board types. Altogether, the bylaws of 95 boards that govern 842 public institutions in the nation were reviewed.
Research Design:
The study used qualitative document and content analysis methods to examine board bylaws.
Findings:
We found that very few boards have any defined (and publicized) requirements for public trusteeship in higher education. We evaluate the findings using a Critical Race Theory and hidden curriculum framework of analysis and discuss the implicit and explicit messages of the board bylaws. This study brings to the forefront that there are either hidden, ambiguous, or little to no requisites for arguably one of the most influential roles in higher education. The lack of transparency in this area may help perpetuate inequity in board representation.
Conclusion/Recommendations:
If institutions desire to enhance transparency and accountability, it is crucial to elucidate standard practices for filling board seats (including qualifications for board service, who gets to decide on these qualifications, and the ramifications of these practices on equitable board member representation). Boards, governors, and other influential decision-makers should contemplate establishing and sharing requirements for board service so that (a) boards enter into this position with a better understanding of what is required of them, and (b) there are more explicit guidelines to support why and how some groups are overrepresented on the board while others have been historically excluded.
AltheideD. L.CoyleM.DeVrieseK.SchneiderC. (2008). Emergent qualitative data analysis. In Hesse-BiberS.LeaveyP. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 127–154). Guilford.
5.
AryD.JacobsL.RazeviehA.SorensenC. (2006). Introduction to research in education. Wadsworth.
6.
Association of Governing Boards. (1981). Trustee selection recommendations (public). AGB Reports, 23(1), 49–52.
7.
Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges. (2003). State policy brief: Merit screening of citizens for gubernatorial appointment to public college and university trusteeship. http://digitalrepository.unm.edu/fs_documents/76
8.
Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges. (2010). Statement on board responsibility for institutional governance.
9.
Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges. (2013). Building public governing board capacity: Suggestions and recommendations to governors and state legislatures for improving selection and composition of public college and university board members.
10.
Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges. (2015). The AGB board of director’s statement on the fiduciary duties of governing board members.
11.
Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges. (2016). Policies, practices and composition of governing and foundation boards 2016.
12.
Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges & Gallup. (2020). The AGB 2020 trustee index: Concern deepens for the future of higher education. https://agb.org/reports-2/the-agb-2020-trustee-index/
13.
BaileyK. D. (1994). Document study. In BaileyK. D. (Ed.), Methods of social research (4th ed., pp. 293–319). The Free Press.
14.
BelcherD. R. (1960). The board of trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. University of Pennsylvania Press.
BirnbaumR. (1988). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. Jossey-Bass.
17.
Blair-LoyM.WhartonA. S.GoodsteinJ. (2011). Exploring the relationship between mission statements and work-life practices in organizations. Organization Studies, 32(3), 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610397480
18.
BogdanR.BiklenS. K. (2011). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Pearson A & B.
19.
BryantV. S. (1964). The role of the regent. AAUP Bulletin, 50(4), 317–322.
20.
BurnsG. P. (1966). Trustees in higher education: Their functions and coordination. Independent College Funds of America.
21.
BuseK.BernsteinR. S.BilimoriaD. (2016). The influence of board diversity, board diversity policies and practices, and board inclusion behaviors on nonprofit governance practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(1), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610397480
Center for Higher Education and Policy Analysis. (2004). Selection and appointment of public trustees to public colleges and universities boards [Policy brief]. Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis, Rossier School of Education, the University of Southern California.
24.
ChaitR. P.HollandT.TaylorB. E. (1996). Improving the performance of governing boards. Oryx Press.
25.
CollisD. J. (2004). The paradox of scope: A challenge to the governance of higher education. In TierneyW. G. (Ed.), Competing conceptions of academic governance: Negotiating the perfect storm (pp. 33–76). The Johns Hopkins University Press.
CorballyJ. E.Jr. (1970). Boards of trustees in the governance of higher education. Theory into Practice, 9(4), 239–243.
28.
CorsonJ. J. (1975). The governance of colleges and universities: Modernizing structures and processes. McGraw-Hill.
29.
CrenshawK.GotandaN.PellerG.ThomasK. (Eds.). (1995). Critical race theory: The keywritings that formed the movement. New Press.
30.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
31.
DantonJ. P. (1937). The appointment and election of boards of control in institutions of higher education in America. The Journal of Educational Research, 30(8), 583–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1937.10880702
32.
DavisG. (1997). Orientation and professional development of trustees. New Directions for Community Colleges, 98, 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.9803
33.
DeCuirJ. T.DixsonA. D. (2004). So when it comes out, they aren’t that surprised that it is there: Using critical race theory as a tool of analysis of race and racism in education. Educational Researcher, 33(5), 26–31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3699853
34.
DikaS. L.JanosikS. M. (2003). The role of selection, orientation and training in improving the quality of public college and university boards of trustees in the United States. Quality in Higher Education, 9(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/1353832032000151139
35.
DoddsP. (1985). Are hunters of the function curriculum seeking quarks or snarks?Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 4(2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.4.2.91
EberhardtJ. (2019). Biased: Uncovering the hidden prejudice that shapes what we see, think, and do. Viking Books.
40.
EckelP. D. (2019). Why governing is so difficult: A synthesis of the (other) literature. Alliance for Higher Education and Democracy, University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education.
41.
ElfrethS. K. (2011). The young guardians: Students as stewards of the past, present, and future of American higher education: A field guide for student board members. Associated Students of Colorado State University.
42.
EllisL.StriplingJ.BaumanD. (2020, September25). The new order: How the nation’s partisan divisions consumed public-college boards and warped higher education. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/the-new-order
43.
ElsassP. M.GravesL. M. (1997). Demographic diversity in decision-making groups: The experiences of women and people of color. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 946–973. https://doi.org/10.2307/259250
FoxM. A. (2001). Flagship institutions, public higher education and research. American Scientist, 89(6), 482.
46.
FredericksonG. (2005). Whatever happened to public administration? Governance, governance everywhere. In FerlieE.LynnL.PollittC. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 282–304). Oxford University Press.
47.
FreedmanJ. O. (2005). Presidents and trustees. In EhrenbergR. G. (Ed.), Governing academia (pp. 9–27). Cornell University Press.
48.
GaleR. L.FreemanF. (1993). Orienting trustees and developing the board. In IngramR. T. & Associates (Eds.), Governing public colleges and universities: A handbook for trustees, chief executives, and other campus leaders (pp. 305–313). Jossey-Bass.
49.
GasmanM.AbiolaU.TraversC. (2015). Diversity and senior leadership at elite institutions of higher education. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038872
GirouxH. A. (1983). Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 257–293. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.53.3.a67x4u33g7682734
HagedornL. S.ChiW. Y.CepedaR. M.McLainM. (2007). An investigation of critical mass: The role of Latino representation in the success of urban community college students. Research in Higher Education, 48(1), 73–91. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25704493
HartnettR. T. (1969). College and university trustees: Their backgrounds, roles, and educational attitudes. Educational Testing Service.
59.
HendersonA. D. (1967). The role of the governing board. Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges.
60.
HendricksonR. M.LaneJ. E.HarrisJ. T.DormanR. H. (2013). Academic leadership and governance in higher education: A guide for trustees, leaders, and aspiring leaders of two- and four-year institutions. Stylus.
61.
HerronO. R. (1969). The role of the trustee. International Textbook Company.
HodderI. (2000). The interpretation of documents and material culture. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 703–716). SAGE.
JacksonP. (1968). Life in classrooms. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
67.
JanosikS.DikaS. (2000). EPI research brief: Selecting and training public college and university trustees. Educational Policy Institute of Virginia Tech.
68.
JayM. (2003). Critical race theory, multicultural education, and the hidden curriculum of hegemony. Multicultural Perspectives: An Official Journal of the National Association for Multicultural Education, 5(4), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327892MCP0504_2
69.
JohnsonA. G. (2006). Privilege, power, and difference. McGraw Hill.
70.
JohnsonG.HowsamR. (2020). Whiteness, power and the politics of demographics in the governance of the Canadian academy. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 676–694. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423920000207
KaplanG. E. (2004). How academic ships actually navigate. In EhrenbergR. G. (Ed.), Governing academia (pp. 165–208). Cornell University Press.
73.
KaranxhaZ.AgostoV.BellaraA. P. (2013). The hidden curriculum: Candidate diversity in educational leadership preparation. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 9(1), 34–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775113498374
74.
KerrC.GadeM. L. (1989). The guardians: Boards of trustees of American colleges and universities: What they do and how well they do it. Association of Governing Boards and Universities.
75.
KezarA. J. (2006). Rethinking higher education governing boards performance: Results of a national study of governing boards in the United States. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(6), 968–1008. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2006.0051
76.
KhalifaM.DunbarC.DouglasT.-R. (2013). Derrick Bell, CRT, and educational leadership 1995–present. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(4), 489–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2013.817770
Ladson-BillingsG. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/095183998236863
79.
Ladson-BillingsG.TateW. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–68.
LevinsonB. A.SuttonM.WinsteadT. (2009). Education policy as a practice of power: Theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Educational Policy, 23(6), 767–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904808320676
82.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
83.
LingenfelterP.NovakR.LegonR. (2008, June 8–9). Excellence at scale—What is required of public leadership and governance in higher education? [Paper presentation]. Conference of the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
84.
LonganeckerD. (2006). The “new” new challenge of governance by governing boards. In TierneyW. G. (Ed.), Governance and the public good (pp. 95–116). State University of New York.
85.
MartinJ.SamelsJ. E. (1997). First among equals: The role of the chief academic officer. Johns Hopkins University Press.
86.
MartinJ. R. (1976). What should we do with a hidden curriculum when we find one?Curriculum Inquiry, 6(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.2307/1179759
87.
MartoranaS. V. (1963). College boards of trustees. Center for Applied Research in Education.
88.
MathiesC.SlaughterS. (2013). University trustees as channels between academe and industry: Toward an understanding of the executive science network. Research Policy, 42(6–7), 1286–1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.003
89.
MatsudaM.LawrenceC.DelgadoR.CrenshawK. (1993). Words that wound: Critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the first amendment. Westview Press.
90.
MayersD.ShivdasaniA.SmithC. W.Jr. (1997). Board composition and corporate control: Evidence from the insurance industry. Journal of Business, 70(1), 33–62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2353480
91.
McIntoshP. (1990). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. Independent School, 49(2), 31–36.
92.
McLendonM. K. (2003). The politics of higher education: Toward an expanded research agenda. Educational Policy, 17(1), 165–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904802239291
93.
MerriamS. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
94.
MichaelS. O.SchwartzM. (1999). Perceived role of trustees: A study of higher education institutions in Ohio. Journal of Educational Administration, 37(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578239910263042
95.
MichaelS. O.SchwartzM.HamiltonA. (1997). Trustee selection/appointment and orientation: A comparative analysis of higher education sectors in Ohio. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 19(2), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080970190203
96.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE.
97.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.
98.
MillsM. R. (2007). Stories of politics and policy: Florida’s higher education governance reorganization. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(2), 162–187. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4501201
99.
MinorJ. T. (2008). The relationship between selection processes of public trustees and state higher education performance. Educational Policy, 22(6), 830–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904807310040
100.
MorganD. L.RallR. M.CommodoreF. (2021). Hiding in plain sight: Uncovering the role of state-level governing boards and political discourse in the higher education policymaking process. Journal of Higher Education, 92(4), 570–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2020.1824885
101.
MorphewC. C.HartleyM. (2006). Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across institutional type. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 456–471. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3838697
102.
NasonJ. W. (1980). Responsibilities of the governing board. In IngramR. T. & Associates (Eds.), Handbook of college and university trusteeship (pp. 27–46). Jossey-Bass.
103.
NasonJ. W. (1982). The nature of trusteeship: The role and responsibilities of college and university boards. Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges.
NovakR.JohnstonS. W. (2005). Trusteeship and the public good. In KezarA.ChambersT. C.BurkhardtJ. C. (Eds.), Higher education for the public good: Emerging voices from a national movement (pp. 87–101). Jossey-Bass.
O’NeilR. M. (2013). Updating board bylaws: A guide for colleges and universities. Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges.
108.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE.
109.
PintoA. D.MansonH.PaulyB.ThanosJ.ParksA.CoxA. (2012). Equity in public health standards: A qualitative document analysis of policies from two Canadian provinces. International Journal for Equity in Health, 11(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-11-28
PusserB.OrdorikaI. (2001). Bringing political theory to university governance: The University of California and the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XVI, pp. 147–197). Agathon Press.
112.
PusserB.SlaughterS.ThomasS. L. (2006). Playing the board game: An empirical analysis of university trustee and corporate board interlocks. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 747–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2006.11778943
113.
RallR. M. (2014). Assuming the trusteeship: Studying the influence of learning and preparation on the decision-making practices of members of public multi campus boards of higher education [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Southern California.
114.
RallR. M. (2020a). Boards of trustees, systems. In DavidM.AmeyM. (Eds.), The SAGE encyclopedia of higher education (Vol. 1, pp. 166–170). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529714395.n66.
115.
RallR. M. (2020b). Higher education institution governing boards. In DavidM.AmeyM. (Eds.), The SAGE encyclopedia of higher education (Vol. 1, pp. 742–745). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529714395.n278.
116.
RallR. M. (2022). Comparative perspectives on systems of higher education in the US and India. In PriyamM. (Ed.). Reclaiming public universities: Comparative reflections for reforms.Taylor & Francis.
117.
RallR. M.MorganD. L.CommodoreF. (2019). Invisible injustice: Higher education boards and issues of diversity, equity, and inclusivity. In JeffriesR. (Ed.), Diversity, Equity, and Inclusivity in Contemporary Higher Education (pp. 261–277). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5724-1.ch016
118.
RallR. M.MorganD. L.CommodoreF. (2020). Toward Culturally Sustaining Governance: Best practices of theory, research, and practice. The Journal of Education Human Resources, 38(1), 139–164.
119.
RallR. M.MorganD. L.CommodoreF. (2021). Bounded boards: A commentary on the limitations of knowledge and scope of research on boards of higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 46(6), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09582-6
120.
RallR. M.OruéV. (2020). I, too, am a lead(her): The power and possibilities of women of color on governing boards of higher education in California. Journal of Higher Education Management, 35(1), 32–39.
RoseM. W. (1993). The trustee selection process in Virginia’s public, four-year colleges and universities (1985–1989) [Doctoral dissertation]. Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, University of Virginia.
124.
SambellK.McDowellL. (1998). The construction of the hidden curriculum: Messages and meanings in the assessment of student learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(4), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293980230406
125.
SchmidtB. C. (2014). Governance for a new era: A blueprint for higher education trustees. American Council of Trustees and Alumni.
126.
SchneiderA.IngramH. (1997). Policy design for democracy. University Press of Kansas.
127.
SemperJ. V. O.BlascoM. (2018). Revealing the hidden curriculum in higher education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 37(5), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-018-9608-5
128.
ShawK. A. (1992). The role of trustees in the 1990s. In BudigG. A. (Ed.), A higher education map for the 1990s (pp. 24–33). American Council on Education and MacMillan.
129.
SnyderB. R. (1971). The hidden curriculum. MIT Press.
130.
SolórzanoD. G. (1997). Images and words that wound: Critical race theory, racial stereotyping, and teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 24(3), 5–19.
131.
TateW. F.IV. (1997). Critical race theory and education: History, theory, and implications. Review of Research in Education, 22, 195–247. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X022001195
132.
TaylorJ. S.de Lourdes MachadoM. (2008). Governing boards in public higher education institutions: A perspective from the United States. Tertiary Education and Management, 14(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880802348824
133.
TierneyW. G. (1997). Academic outlaws: Queer theory and cultural studies in the academy. SAGE.
134.
TownsendB. K. (1995, November 2–5). Is there a hidden curriculum in higher education doctoral programs? [Paper presentation]. Association for the Study of Higher Education Conference, Orlando, FL, United States.
135.
TracyS. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
136.
WarrenH. G. (1914). Academic freedom. Atlantic Monthly, 114, 689–699.
