Ida B. Wells-Barnett’s (1862–1931) contributions as a journalist and activist have been documented extensively. However, her contributions to the discipline of sociology have not been fully acknowledged. Moreover, despite the analyses of gender and race in U.S. society that Wells-Barnett presented in her work, she has yet to be formally canonized. The marginalization of Wells-Barnett and her scholarship has implications for the discipline, principally in doctoral programs where the sociological canon is reproduced. Using the framework of Black feminist thought, this paper asserts that the intellectual contributions of Ida B. Wells-Barnett fulfill the criteria to be considered a classical theory. Through an examination of Wells-Barnett’s 1895 book The Red Record, I posit that Wells-Barnett’s scholarship was a precursor to intersectionality, surveying historical context and power as it relates to racialized violence. The paper concludes with suggestions for substantively integrating her scholarship into sociological curricula.
AllenShaonta’E. 2022. “The Black Feminist Roots of Scholar-Activism: Lessons from Ida B. Wells-Barnett.” Pp. 32–44 in Black Feminist Sociology: Perspectives and Praxis, edited by LunaZ.PirtleW. N. L.New York, NY: Routledge.
American Sociological Association. 2020b. “Settler Colonialism and Confronting the Canon: Promoting Inclusion in Your Department’s Curriculum—Resources for Sociologists.” American Sociological Association. Retrieved October 5, 2024 (https://vimeo.com/473871716/4876a06c28?fl=pl&fe=vl).
4.
BaehrPeter. 2002. Founders, Classical, and Canons: Modern Disputes over the Origins and Appraisals of Sociology’s Heritage. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
5.
BayMia. 2010. “‘If Iola Were a Man’: Gender, Jim Crow and Public Protest in the Work of Ida B. Wells.” Pp. 105–128 in Becoming Visible Women’s Presence in Late Nineteenth-Century America, edited by FloydJ.EllisR. J.TraubL.Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Publishers.
6.
BhambraGurminder K.2014. “A Sociological Dilemma: Race, Segregation and US Sociology.” Current Sociology Monograph62(4):472–92.
7.
BurawoyMichael. 2021. “Why is Classical Theory Classical? Theorizing the Canon and Canonizing Du Bois.” Journal of Classical Sociology21(3–4):1–15.
8.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2022a. Another Kind of Public Education. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2022b. “Black Feminist Sociology: An Interview with Patricia Hill Collins.” Pp. 19–31 in Black Feminist Sociology: Perspectives and Praxis, edited by LunaZ.PirtleW. N. L.New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2022c. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
ConnellRobert William. 1997. “Why is Classical Theory Classical?” American Journal of Sociology102(6):1511–57.
14.
CrenshawKimberlé. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review43(6):1241–99.
15.
CurryTommy J.2012. “The Fortune of Wells: Ida B. Wells-Barnett’s Use of T. Thomas Fortune’s Philosophy of Social Agitation as a Prolegomenon to Militant Civil Rights Activism Author(s).” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society48(4):456–82.
16.
DeeganMary Jo. 1981. “Early Women Sociologists and the American Sociological Society: The Patterns of Exclusion and Participation.” The American Sociologist16(1):14–24.
17.
DowdJames J.1991. “Revising the Canon: Graduate Training in the Two Sociologies.” Teaching Sociology19(3):308–321.
18.
DusterMichelle. 2021. Ida B. The Queen: The Extraordinary Life and Legacy of Ida B. Wells. New York, NY: One Signal Publishers.
19.
GiddingsPaula. 2008. Ida A Sword among Lions: Ida B. Wells and the Campaign against Lynching. New York, NY: Amistad Publishers.
20.
GiddingsPaula. 2020. “Missing in Action: Ida B. Wells, the NAACP, and the Historical Record.” Meridians1(2):1–17.
21.
GoJulian. 2020. “Race, Empire, and Epistemic Exclusion: Or the Structures of Sociological Thought.” Sociological Theory38(2):79–100.
22.
JacksonPhillip. 1968. Life in Classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
23.
KingWilma. 2014. “‘Prematurely Knowing of Evil Things’: The Sexual Abuse of African American Girls and Young Women in Slavery and Freedom.” Journal of African American History99(3):173–96.
24.
LengermannPatricia M.NiebruggeGillian. 2007. The Women Founders: Sociology and Social Theory, 1830-1930 A Text/Reader. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
25.
MargolisEricRomeroMary. 1998. “‘The Department is Very Male, Very White, Very Old, and Very Conservative’: The Functioning of the Hidden Curriculum in Graduate Sociology Departments.” Harvard Educational Review68(1):1–32.
NicholsCaroline C.2009. “The ‘Adventuress’ Becomes a ‘Lady’: Ida B. Wells’ British Tours.” Modern Language Studies38(2):46–63.
28.
PulleyAislinnAnigboAnwuliJohnsonMorgan Elise. 2024. “Celebrate the Living Legacy of Ida B. Wells.” Lecture presented at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, March 28.
StoneAshley. 2022. “In Plain Sight: Examining the Diffusion of Black Women’s Knowledge in the Era of Expanding the Sociological Canon.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Central Florida.
32.
TurnerJonathan H.BoynsDavid E.2001. “The Return of Grand Theory.” Pp. 353–78 in Handbook of Sociological Theory, edited by TurnerJ. H.New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
33.
WarrenJohn Robert. 2019. “How Much Do You Have to Publish to Get a Job in a Top Sociology Department? Or to Get Tenure? Trends over a Generation.” Sociological Science6:172–96.
34.
WatkinsRychetta N.2008. “The Southern Roots of Ida B. Wells-Barnett’s Revolutionary Activism.” Southern Quarterly45(3):108–126.
35.
Wells-BarnettIda B. [1892] 2013. Southern Horrors: Lynch Law in All Its Phases. Kindle.
36.
Wells-BarnettIda B.1895. The Red Record. Kindle.
37.
Wells-BarnettIda B. [1970] 2020. Crusade for Justice: The Autobiography of Ida B. Wells. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Kindle.
38.
Wells-BarnettIda B.DouglasFrederickPennIrvine GarlandBarnettFerdinand L. [1893] 1999. The Reason Why the Colored American Is Not in the World’s Columbian Exposition, edited by RydellR. W.Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
39.
WingfieldAdia Harvey. 2008. Doing Business with Beauty: Black Women, Hair Salons, and the Racial Enclave Economy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
WrightEarlII. 2002. “Why Black People Tend to Shout! An Earnest Attempt to Explain the Sociological Negation of the Atlanta Sociological Laboratory Despite Its Possible Unpleasantness.” Sociological Spectrum22(3):335–61.
42.
WrightEarlII. 2009. “Beyond W.E.B. Du Bois: A Note on Some of the Little Known Members of the Atlanta Sociological Laboratory.” Sociological Spectrum29:700–717.
43.
WrightEarlII. 2020. Jim Crow Sociology: The Black and Southern Roots of American Sociology. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati Press.
44.
ZackodnikTeresa. 2005. “Ida B. Wells and ‘American Atrocities’ in Britain.” Women’s Studies International Forum28:259–273.
