The dynamic interaction between political ideologies, social attitudes, and social welfare policies greatly influences the health and social outcomes of low-income single mother families. To develop social and economic systems that better serve and honor these families we studied the historical, political, and cultural contexts that shaped mothers’ roles and the struggles they encounter as they work to balance childcare duties with financial survival. We explore how the ideological shifts between humanistic and moralistic social welfare approaches affect perceptions of welfare and single motherhood. We analyze narratives surrounding single mothers using historical data and contemporary literary works to illustrate the ongoing struggles and systemic failures. The long history of shifting between humanistic and moralistic welfare policies has undeniably contributed to both improvements and setbacks in conditions faced by single mothers. Our analyses reveal an urgent need to reevaluate social policies to better support low-income single mothers and address the root causes of their hardships, advocating for more humane and equitable approaches to social welfare. As the numbers of these families are growing, it is crucial to develop and implement new frameworks that support single mothers, and end gender disparities that contribute to the generational cycle of poverty.
AltschulerS.MetzlJ. M.WaldP.2023. Keywords for Health Humanities. New York, NY:NYU Press, 2023.
2.
AngelouMaya. 1994. Angelou, Maya. “Momma Welfare Roll.” in The Complete Collected Poems of Maya Angelou (p. 148). New York: Random House, 1994. New York, NY: Random House.
BarrientosArmandoAbdulaiAbdul-GafaruDemiragDaisyDe GrootRichardRagnoLuigi Peter. 2016. Why Assist People Living in Poverty? The Ethics of Poverty Reduction. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Office of Research – Innocenti.
5.
BoertienDiederikBernardiFabrizio. 2022. “Gendered Diverging Destinies: Changing Family Structures and the Reproduction of Educational Inequalities Among Sons and Daughters in the United States.” Demography59(1):111–36.
6.
BowieNorman E.1979. “Welfare and Freedom.” Ethics89(3):254–68.
7.
BrassClinton T.VincentCarol HardyJacksonPamela J.LakeJennifer E.SparKaren. 2009. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-5): Summary and Legislative History. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
8.
BrinkleyA.2011. The End of Reform: New Deal Liberalism in Recession and War. New York, NY: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
9.
BruecknerJan K.2000. “Welfare Reform and the Race to the Bottom: Theory and Evidence.” Southern Economic Journal66(3): 505–525.
ChavdaKersiNisargaVinyas. 2023. “Single Parenting: Impact on Child’s Development.” Journal of Indian Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health19(1):14–20.
12.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2002. Mammies, Matriarchs, and Other Controlling Images. New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
Congressional Reports Services. 2023. “The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Block Grant.” Retrieved April 17, 2023 (https://crsreports.congress.gov/).
14.
CreamerJohnShriderEmily A.BurnsKaleeChenFrances. 2022. Poverty in the United States: 2021 Current Population Reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office.
15.
DanzigerSandra K.2010. “The Decline of Cash Welfare and Implications for Social Policy and Poverty.” Annual Review of Sociology36:523–45.
16.
DixonJohn. 2010. “Comparative Social Welfare: The Existential Humanist Perspective and Challenge.” Journal of Comparative Social Welfare26(2–3):177–87.
17.
EdinK.ShaeferLuke H.2015. $2.00 a Day: Living on Almost Nothing in the America. Boston, MA: Harcourt Mifflin.
18.
FalkGene. 2018. Welfare Reform: Work Status of Single Mothers, In Brief. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
19.
FaricyChristopherEllisChristopher. 2014. “Public Attitudes Toward Social Spending in the United States: The Differences Between Direct Spending and Tax Expenditures.” Political Behavior36(1):53–76.
20.
FolsomBurton W.2019. “The Fall and Rise of Laissez-Faire in the United States, 1789–1900.” The Independent Review23(3):357–67.
21.
GlennEvelyn Nakano. 2010. “Forced to Care: Coercion and Caregiving in America.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
GrobGerald N.MohlRaymond A.RosenbergCarroll SmithRothmanDavid J.1973. “Welfare and Poverty in American History.” Reviews in American History1(1):43.
24.
GroshMargaretLeitePhillippeWai-PoiMatthewTesliucEmil. 2022. Revisiting Targeting in Social Assistance: A New Look at Old Dilemmas. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
25.
GuetzkowJoshua. 2010. “Beyond Deservingness: Congressional Discourse on Poverty, 1964–1996.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science629(1):173–97.
IidaTakeshiMatsubayashiTetsuya. 2010. “Constitutions and Public Support for Welfare Policies.” Social Science Quarterly91(1):42–62.
30.
ImmervollHerwigKnotzCarlo. 2018. How Demanding Are Activation Requirements for Jobseekers? New Evidence on Activity-Related Eligibility Criteria for Unemployment and Social Assistance Benefits. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 215. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
31.
KeynesJohn Maynard. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.
32.
LandStephanie. 2019. Maid: Hard Work, Low Pay, and a Mother’s Will to Survive. New York, NY: Hachette Books.
33.
LeffMark H.1973. “Consensus for Reform: The Mothers’-Pension Movement in the Progressive Era. Vol. 47.” Social Service Review47(3):397–417.
McLanahanS.JencksChristopher. 2015. “Was Moynihan Right? What Happens to Children of Unmarried Mothers.” Education Next15:14–20.
36.
McLanahanS.PercheskiChristine. 2008. “Family Structure and the Reproduction of Inequalities.” Review of Sociology34:257–76.
37.
McLanahanS.2004. “Diverging Destinies: How Children are Faring Under the Second Demographic Transition.” Demography41(4): 607–627.
38.
MclanahanS.GarfinkelIrwin. 1989. “Single Mothers, the Underclass, and Social Policy.” Source: The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science501:92–104.
39.
MettlerSuzanne. 2000. “States’ Rights, Women’s Obligations: Contemporary Welfare Reform in Historical Perspective.” Women and Politics21(1):1–34.
40.
MoffittRobert A.2008. “A Primer on U.S. Welfare Reform.” Focus26(1):15–25.
41.
MoffittRobert A.2015. “The Deserving Poor, the Family, and the U.S. Welfare System.” Demography52(3):729–49.
42.
MurrayCharles. 1984. Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950–1980. New York, NY: Basic Books.
43.
National Research Council. 2001. Evaluating Welfare Reform in an Era of Transition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
44.
NozickR.1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York, NY: Basic Books.
45.
NussbaumMartha C.2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
46.
NussbaumMartha C.2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. 2023. Living Arrangements of Children by Race/Ethnicity, 1970–2022. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
48.
Onwuachi-WilligAngela. 2005. “The Return of the Ring: Welfare Reform’s Marriage Cure as the Revival of Post-Bellum Control.” California Law Review93(6):1647–96.
49.
ParkerAly. 2009. “Can’t Buy Me Love: Funding Marriage Promotion versus Listening to Real Needs in Breaking the Cycle of Poverty.” Southern California Review of Law and Social Justice18(2):493–538.
50.
PettitBGutierrezC.2018. “Mass Incarceration and Racial Inequality.” American Journal of Economic Sociology77(3–4):1153–1182.
51.
Poba-NzaouPlacideGalaniMalatsiUwizeyemunguSylvestreCericArnela. 2021. “The Impacts of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Jobs: An Industry Perspective.” Strategic HR Review20(2):60–65.
52.
RawlsJ.1999. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
53.
RenshawPatrick. 1999. “Was There a Keynesian Economy in the USA between 1933 and 1945?” Journal of Contemporary History34(3):337–64.
54.
RobeynsIngrid. 2005. “The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey.” Journal of Human Development6(1):93–114.
55.
RobeynsIngrid. 2006. “The Capability Approach in Practice.” Journal of Political Philosophy14(3):351–76.
56.
RugerJennifer Prah. 2016. “The Health Capability Paradigm and the Right to Health Care in the United States.” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics37(4):275–92.
57.
SayerAndrew. 2017. “Welfare and Moral Economy.” Ethics and Social Welfare12(1):20–33.
58.
SchottLiz. 2009. Opportunities Under the TANF Emergency Fund Created by the Federal Recovery Act. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
59.
SenA.1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
60.
ShriderEmily A.CreamerJohn. 2023. Poverty in the United States: 2022 (Current Population Reports). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office.
61.
ShriderEmily A.KollarMelissaChenFrancesSemegaJessica. 2020. Income and Poverty in the United States: 2020 (Current Population Reports). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office.
62.
SmithChelseaCrosnoeRobertCavanaghShannon E.2017. “Family Instability and Children’s Health.” Family Relations66(4):601–13.
TrattnerW. I.2007. From Poor Law to Welfare State: A History of Social Welfare in America (6th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
65.
U.S. Congress. 1964. Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, part 1. In House Subcommittee on the War on Poverty Program of the Committee on Education and Labor, U.S. Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
66.
U.S. Congress. 1985. War on Poverty: Victory or Defeat? In Subcommittee on Monetary and Fiscal Policy of the Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
67.
U.S. Social Security Board. 1937. Social Security in America: The Factual Background of the Social Security Act as Summarized from Staff Reports to the Committee on Economic Security. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
United Nations Development Program (UNDP). 2024. “Human Development Report 2023–24.” United Nations Development Program (UNDP).
70.
WagmillerRobert L.LeeKristen SchultzSuJessica Houston. 2020. “The Role of Welfare in Family Income Inequality: 1968–2016.” Children and Youth Services Review119:105615.
WilliamsWilliam Carlos. 1932. “Jean Biecke.” In the Doctor Stories. New York, NY: New Directions.
75.
WilsonWilliam Julius. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
76.
WrightSharon. 2016. “Conceptualising the Active Welfare Subject: Welfare Reform in Discourse, Policy and Lived Experience.” Policy and Politics44:235–52.
