Ubiquitous technology theoretically allows for the creation of a global classroom with students engaging scholars, activists, and other professionals from around the world. Technical and pedagogical issues, however, can result in less-than-effective presentations that in turn result in negative learning outcomes. Using a case study approach, we discuss the key considerations, common pitfalls, and outcomes of using Skype to facilitate a guest lecture with three presenters in three different locations.
Agha-JaffarTamara. 2000. “From Theory to Praxis in Women’s Studies.” The Feminist Teacher13:1–11.
2.
BarniskisBeccaThompsonLisa Maren. 2012. “The Art of the Videoconference Lesson: Practical Application and Implications.” Teaching Artists Journal10:15–23.
3.
BeatonSusan J.ForsterPeter M.. 2013. “Using a Simple, Free Voice-over-Internet Protocol Service to Add Interest to Lectures and Enhance Student Engagement.” Psychology Teaching Review19:28–32.
4.
BelenkyMary FieldClinchyBlythe McvickerGoldbergerNancy RuleTaruleJill Mattuck. 1986. Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. New York: Basic Books.
5.
BemSandra L.1983. “Gender Schema Theory and Its Implications for Child Development: Raising Gender-aschematic Children in a Gender-schematic Society.” Signs8:598–619.
CrossGary. 1997. Kids’ Stuff: Toys and the Changing World of American Childhood. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
DoughertyKevin. 2002. “Giving Voice: The Challenge for a White Instructor in a Multicultural Course.” Michigan Sociological Review16:63–77.
9.
GlassBecky L.2007. “Videoconferencing: A Way for Students to Meet Their Sociological Heroes.” Teaching Sociology35:274–81.
10.
GoffmanErving. (1979). Gender Advertisements. New York: Harper and Row.
11.
KatonaArthur. 1943. “The Teaching of Sociology in a Democracy.” American Sociological Review8:439–49.
12.
KlineStephen. 1993. Out of the Garden: Toys, TV, and Children’s Culture in the Age of Marketing. London, UK: Jossey-Bass.
13.
KoeberCharlesWrightDavid W.. 2008. “On the Outside Teaching in: Using Internet Video-conferencing to Instruct an Introductory Sociology Course from a Remote Location.” Teaching Sociology36:331–43.
14.
KubalTimothyStoneRosalie TorresMeylerDeannaMauneyTeelyn T.2003. “Teaching Diversity and Learning Outcomes: Bringing Lived Experience into the Classroom.” Teaching Sociology31:441–55.
15.
LairdThomas F.KuGeorge D.. 2005. “Student Experiences with Information Technology and Their Relationship to Other Aspects of Student Engagement.” Research in Higher Education46:211–32.
16.
MannSandiRobinsonAndrew. 2009. “Boredom in the Lecture Theatre: An Investigation into the Contributors, Moderators, and Outcomes of Boredom Amongst University Students.” British Educational Research Journal35:243–58.
17.
MessnerMichael A.2000. “The Barbie Girls Versus the Sea Monsters: Children Constructing Gender.” Gender & Society14:765–84.
18.
OrensteinPeggy. 2011. Cinderella Ate My Daughter: Dispatches from the Front Lines of the New Girlie-girl Culture. New York: Harper Collins.
19.
PerryWilliam G.Jr. 1970. Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
20.
PfefferCarla A.RogalinChristabel L.. 2012. “Three Strategies for Teaching Research Methods: A Case Study.” Teaching Sociology40:368–76.
ShortFayMartinJesse. 2011. “Presentation vs. Performance: Effects of Lecturing Style on Student Preference and Student Learning.” Psychology Teaching Review17:71–82.
23.
ThakoreBhoomi K.WestRebecca. 2012. “‘They All Look Alike’: Racial Perception, Popular Culture, and American Girl Dolls.” In Solidarity (The Newsletter of Loyola University Chicago’s Department of Sociology). Spring, pp. 2, 12–13. Available at: http://www.luc.edu/media/lucedu/sociology/pdfs/newsletters/NL_1122.pdf.
