This study investigates the effectiveness of structured union out reach activities at manufacturing extension centers. An analysis of inter view and survey data from three centers that participated in a labor out reach pilot program indicates that while the program was successful in increasing union leader awareness of the extension services, several struc tural and political obstacles limited its overall effectiveness. Union out reach programs were most successful at centers that engaged in long-term change interventions, integrated labor outreach into their overall opera tions, had local/regional union support for the program, and subsidized the services offered to unions.
Baugh, Robert.Changing Work: A Union Guide to Workplace Change. Washington, D.C.: AFL-CIO Human Resources Development Institute , 1994.
2.
Bergman, Terri.Delivering Cost Effective Services to Small and Mid-Sized Companies . Business Assistance Note 4. Washington, D.C.: National Alliance of Business, National Workforce Assistance Collaborative , 1995.
3.
Bongiorno, Steven J. "States innovate programs to grow high-tech industry." Industry Week. 19 September 1994: 53-55.
4.
Braunstein, David. "Meeting the manufacturing challenge." Manufacturing Engineering121.1 (1998): 172.
5.
Cooke, William N. "Product quality improvement through employee participation: the effects of unionization and joint union-management administration." Industrial and Labor Relations Review46.1 (1992): 119-134.
6.
Dertouzos, M.L., R.K. Lester, R.M. Solow. and the MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity.Made in America. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press, 1989.
7.
Emspak, Frank.Looking Towards the Future. Paper presented at the Technology and Work Place Change Conference, George Meany Center for Labor Studies, 13-14 July 1995.
8.
Ewing, Linda, Sheldon Friedman, Brad Markell and Joel Yudken. "Unions and Technology: Manufacturing Better Jobs." Working USA, July-August 1998: 19-29.
9.
Friedman, Sheldon.Using Evaluation to Promote Inclusion of Workers and Unions as MEP 'Strategic Partners' and Clients. Washington, D.C.: AFL-CIO Research Department, 17 October 1995 .
10.
Haddad, Carol J. "Involving manufacturing employees in the early stages of product development: a case study from the U.S. automobile industry. In Ulrich Juergens (Ed.), New Product Development and Production Networks: Global Industrial Experience. Berlin: Springer, 2000.
11.
Haddad, Carol Joyce. "Sector councils as models of shared governance in training and adjustment ." In Morley Gunderson & Andrew Sharpe (Eds.). Forging Business-Labour Partnerships: The Emergence of Sector Councils in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1998.
12.
Haddad, Carol J. "The contribution of Canadian sectoral training councils to training strategy and practice." In Paula Voos (Ed.). Industrial Relations Research Association: Proceedings of the Forty-Eighth Annual Meeting. Madison, WI.: IRRA, 1996.
13.
Haddad, Carol J. "Unions and Technological Change: Labour Research Strategies and Structures in the U.S.A. and Canada. In Keith Forrester and Colin Thorne (Eds.). Trade Unions and Social Research. Aldershot, England: Avebury, 1993.
14.
Kosco, Janice. "NIST to Fund Mid-America Manufacturing Technology Center." NIST Press Release, 96-28, 1 August 1996. http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/n9628.htm.
National Research Council, Manufacturing Studies Board.Learning to Change: Opportunities to Improve the Performance of Smaller Manufacturers . Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1993.
17.
Newman, Michael E. FY1997Budget History. Gaithersburg, MD. NIST Budget Office, 1 October 1996. @#x3C;http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/budget/budget_961001.htm> .
Nist-Mep.MEP: Making a Difference for America's Manufacturers. Undated.
21.
Nist.NIST Home Page and Guide to NIST, 1998. @#x3C;http://www.nist.gov/>.
22.
Nist."Technology Administration Appropriation Budget Summary: FY 1997-FY 1999." 1999 Budget Highlights. February 1998. http://www.nist.gov/publ...dget/99budget_hilite.htm (10 August 1998).
23.
OMSD (Ontario Ministry of Skills Development).Ontario Skills. Toronto: Queen's Printer for Ontario, 1992.
24.
Prabhakar, Arati.Statement of Arati Prabhakar, Director, NIST, Before the Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, State, The Judiciary, and Related Agencies. Committee on Appropriation, United States Senate, 6 April 1995. @#x3C;http://www.nist.gov/testimony/testny06.htm> .
25.
Reddy, Leo. "Industrial-strength aid for small business." Technology Review96.5 (1993): 54-59.
26.
Shapira, Philip, Jan Youtie, and J. David Roessner . "Current practices in the evaluation of US industrial modernization programs." ResearchPolicy25.2 ( 1996): 185-214.
27.
U.S. Congress.Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988. Public Law 100-418, Section 5121. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1988..
28.
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology.Guide to NIST. NIST Special Publication 858. Gaithersburg, MD.: NIST Public Affairs Division, 1993.
29.
Walton, Richard E. and Robert B.McKersie. "Managing new technology and labor relations: an opportunity for mutual influence." In David C. Mowery & Bruce E. Henderson (Eds.). The Challenge of New Technology to Labor Relations. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor-Management Relations, 1991.
30.
Whyte, William F. (Ed.). Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications , 1991.
