American Planning Association, National Association of Counties, and American Public Works Association. 1996. Implementing the new telecommunications law: A county and local officials' guide to the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Washington, D.C.: American Planning Association, National Association of Counties, and American Public Works Association.
2.
ArrandaleTom. 1996. Power play. Governing9, no. 31: 20–24.
3.
BlandRobert L.1989. A revenue guide for local government. Washington, D.C.: International City Management Association, National Association of Counties, and American Public Works Association.
4.
BlandRobert L.1997. Franchise fees and telecommunications services: Is a new paradigm needed?State Tax Notes12, no. 31: 437–44.
5.
CaseKarl. 1992. State and local tax policy and the telecommunication industry. Washington, D.C.: Council of Governor's Policy Advisors.
6.
CohenArmondKihmSteven. 1994. The political economy of retail wheeling, or how to not re-fight the last war. The Electricity Journal7, no. 31: 49–61.
7.
CorniaGary C.1995. Perspectives on the business property tax. In Taxation of Business Property. JohnBowman, ed. New York: Praeger.
8.
CostelloKenneth W.BurnsRobert E.HegazyYoussef. 1994. Overview of issues relating to the retail wheeling of electricity. Columbus, Ohio: The National Regulatory Research Institute.
9.
Deloitte and Touche. 1996. Federal, state and local tax implications of electric utility industry restructuring. An analysis for the National Council on Competition and the Electric Industry. Dallas, Texas.
10.
Di LorenzoThomas J.1982. Utility profits, fiscal illusion, and local public expenditures. Public Choice38, no. 31: 343–52.
11.
DreyfusDaniel A.1989. Deregulation of utilities: The natural gas experience. Business Economics24, no. 31: 41–47.
12.
DuannDaniel J.1993. The FERC restructuring rule: implications for local distribution companies and state public utility commissions. November. Columbus, Ohio: The National Regulatory Research Institute.
13.
DueJohn F.MikesellJohn L.. 1994. Sales taxation, state and local structure and administration. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
Edison Electric Institute. 1996. Retail wheeling & restructuring sourcebook. Washington, D.C.: Edison Electric Institute.
15.
EisnerMark Allen. 1993. Regulatory politics in transition. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16.
EspositoVincent J.1995. Death by taxes. Public Utilities Fortnightly (August): 23–25.
17.
FieldsJ.H.1994. New regulatory environment changing pipeline operations. Pipeline & Gas Journal221, no. 4 (April): 47–51.
18.
FritschPeter. 1996. Tired of phone wars? Get ready for a fight to sell natural gas. Wall Street Journal (April 16): 1, 6.
19.
GerzonLeonard. 1991. Property tax bias against public utilities—aberration or epidemic. Public Utilities Fortnightly127, no. 4 (February): 29–33.
20.
GoldSteven D.1996. Issues revised by the new federalism. National Tax Journal49, no. 2 (June): 273–87.
21.
GordonRichard L.1982. Reforming the regulation of electric utilities: priorities for the 1980s. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
22.
HymanLeonard S.1992America's electric utilities: Past, present, and future. 4th ed.Arlington, Va.: Public Utilities Reports, Inc.
23.
HymanLeonard S.1994. The electric industry in transition. Public Utilities Fortnightly132, no. 16 (September): 19–23.
24.
HymanLeonard S.DiNapoliEdwardTooleRichard C.. 1997. The new telecommunications industry: Meeting the competition. Vienna, Va.: Public Utility Reports, Inc.
25.
International City/County Management Association (ICMA). 1996. Telecommunications: Planning for the future. Washington, D.C.: ICMA.
26.
KeefeJeffery H.BattRosemary. 1997. United States. In Telecommunications: Restructuring work and employment relations worldwide, 31–88. KatzHarry C., ed. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILP Press.
27.
KellerJohn J.1996. AT&T challenges the bell companies. Wall Street Journal (June 12): 3.
28.
McDermottKarl A.1995. Illinois' changing regulatory incentives. Reinvesting electric utility regulation, 179–98. EnholmGregory B.Robert MalkoJ., eds. Arlington, Va.: Public Utility Reports, Inc.
29.
McHughRichard. 1996. The taxation of telecommunications. In Taxation and economic development: A blueprint for tax reform in Ohio, 751–806. BahlRoy, ed. Columbus, Ohio: Battette Press.
30.
McHughRichard. 1997. Telecommunication taxation in Utah. State Tax Notes8, no. 31: 2305–18.
31.
MorinRoger A.1994. Regulatory finance: Utilities cost of capital. Arlington, Va.: Public Utilities Reports, Inc.
32.
MoyerR. Charles. 1993. The impending restructuring of the electric utility industry: Causes and consequences. Business Economics28, no. 31: 40–44.
33.
National League of Cities. 1996. The Telecommunications Act of 1996: What it means to local governments. Washington, D.C.: National League of Cities.
34.
NavarroPeter. 1996. Electric utilities: The argument for radical deregulation. Harvard Business Review74, no. 31: 112–25.
35.
Ohio Department of Taxation. 1996. Annual report. Columbus, Ohio.
36.
PaganoMichael A.1995. City fiscal conditions in 1995. Washington, D.C.: National League of Cities.
37.
PhillipsCharles F.Jr.1993. The regulation of public utilities: Theory and practice. Arlington, Va.: Public Utilities Reports, Inc.
38.
ReebDonald J.ShapiroHowardTom-sonLouis R.. 1982. State and local taxes and electric utilities. Public Utilities Fortnightly110 (August): 29–39.
39.
RutledgeVirginia B.1997. Restructuring of the electric utilities industry: An overview for government finance officials. Government Finance Review13, no. 31: 19–23.
Standard & Poor's. 1996. Infrastructure utilities & transportation. N.Y.: Standard & Poor's.
45.
StevensonRodney E.PennDavid W.. 1995. Discretionary evolution: Restructuring the electric utility industry. Land Economics71, no. 3 (August): 354–67.
46.
StewartJohn F.1979. Plant size, plant factor, and the shape of the average cost function electric power generation: A nonhomogeneous capital approach. The Bell Journal of Economics10, no. 31: 549–65.
47.
StrongRobert G.1996. Technology: Chasing the stars, valuation in the new age—changes in operations and technologies, appraisal for ad valorem taxation of communications, energy, and transportation properties. Paper prepared for presentation at 1996 Public Utilities Workshop, Wichita, Kansas, August 5.
48.
StummTheodore J.KhanAman. 1996. The effects of utility enterprise fund subsidization and municipal taxes and expenditures. State and Local Government Review28, no. 2 (Spring): 103–13.
49.
Tennessee State Board of Equalization. 1994. Tax aggregate report of Tennessee. Knoxville, Tenn.
50.
U.S. Census Bureau. 1996. Finances of individual city governments having 500,000 population or more: 1993–94. Available from http://www.census.gov/.
51.
U.S. Department of Energy. Energy Information Administration. 1995. Financial statistics of major investor-owned electric utilities. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration.
52.
Tennessee State Board of Equalization. 1996. The changing structure of the electric power industry: An update. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration.
53.
U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS). 1995. 1994 statistics of income: Corporate income tax returns. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
54.
VictorRichard. 1996. Contrived competition: Regulation and deregulation in America. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
55.
WallaceSally. 1995. The effects of economic and demographic changes on state and local budgets. Washington, D.C.: The Finance Project.
56.
WaltersLawrenceCorniaGary C.ShankDavid W.. 1995. Appraisal of public utilities and railroads for ad valorem taxation: Procedural and technical overview. State Tax Notes8, no. 31: 2231–42.
57.
WhiteGeorge T.JamesMona G.. 1995. Local government franchise agreements: Will new technology bring new revenue sources?Government Finance Review11, no. 31: 23–26.
58.
WooleryArlo. 1992. Valuation of railroad and utility property. Cambridge, Mass.: The Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.