Strategic design of direct public engagement methods is an important consideration for local government officials. We present a descriptive and exploratory investigation of correlations between local-level contextual factors and municipal public engagement practices. The article addresses two questions: (1) How heterogeneous are the public engagement mixes utilized by local governments in the United States? (2) What local-level variables are associated with increased heterogeneity of engagement mixes? Using data from the 2016 ICMA Innovation and Emerging Practices in Local Government Survey, we create an index to measure of number of direct public engagement tools and frequency of their use by municipalities. We find that local governments vary widely in combinations and frequency of use of direct public engagement tools, although, in general, increased capacity and resources are associated with more tools used. Municipal scale, home rule, democratic vote share, and demographics of the municipality are associated with increased variety of engagement tools.
AdlerS.BlakeG. F.1990. “The Effects of a Formal Citizen Participation Program on Involvement in the Planning Process: A Case Study of Portland, Oregon.” State & Local Government Review22, no. 1: 37–43.
2.
AertsJ. C.BotzenW.van der VeenA.KrywkowJ.WernersS.2008. “Dealing with Uncertainty in Flood Management through Diversification.” Ecology and Society13, no. 1: 41.
3.
ArceneauxK.ButlerD. M.2016. “How Not to Increase Participation in Local Government: The Advantages of Experiments When Testing Policy Interventions.” Public Administration Review76, no. 1: 131–9.
4.
ArnsteinS. R.1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners35, no. 4: 216–24.
5.
BernerM. M.AmosJ. M.MorseR. S.2011. “What Constitutes Effective Citizen Participation in Local Government? Views from City Stakeholders.” Public Administration Quarterly35, no. 1: 128–63.
6.
BernerM. M.SmithS.2004. “The State of the States: A Review of State Requirements for Citizen Participation in the Local Government Budget Process.” State & Local Government Review36, no. 2: 140–50.
7.
BinghamL. B.NabatchiT.O’LearyR.2005. “The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government.” Public Administration Review65, no. 5: 547–58.
8.
BovairdT.2007. “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services.” Public Administration Review67, no. 5: 846–60.
9.
BowmanA. O. M.BearfieldD. A.ChambersS., et al. 2020. “A New and Reinvigorated Research Agenda for US Local Governments.” State & Local Government Review52, no. 3: 158–72.
10.
BradyH. E.VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.1995. “Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation.” American Political Science Review89, no. 2: 271–94.
11.
BriffaultR.2004. “Home Rule for the Twenty-First Century.” The Urban Lawyer36, no. 2: 253–72.
12.
BrysonJ. M.QuickK. S.SlotterbackC. S.CrosbyB. C.2013. “Designing Public Participation Processes.” Public Administration Review73, no. 1: 23–34.
13.
BuckwalterN. D.2014. “The Potential for Public Empowerment through Government-Organized Participation.” Public Administration Review74, no. 5: 573–84.
14.
CallahanK.2002. “The Utilization and Effectiveness of Citizen Advisory Committees in the Budget Process of Local Governments.” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management14, no. 2: 295–319.
15.
CameronA. C.TrivediP. K.1990. “Regression-Based Tests for Overdispersion in the Poisson Model.” Journal of Econometrics46, no. 3: 347–64.
16.
CarpiniM. X. D.CookF. L.JacobsL. R.2004. “Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Annual Review of Political Science7, no. 1: 315–44.
17.
CarrJ. B.2015. “What Have We Learned about the Performance of Council-Manager Government? A Review and Synthesis of the Research.” Public Administration Review75, no. 5: 673–89.
18.
ChiangS. H.2009. “The Effects of Industrial Diversification on Regional Unemployment in Taiwan: Is the Portfolio Theory Applicable?” The Annals of Regional Science43, no. 4: 947–62.
19.
ChoS.MossbergerK.SwindellD.SelbyJ. D.2021. “Experimenting with Public Engagement Platforms in Local Government.” Urban Affairs Review57, no. 3: 763–93.
20.
ContrerasS.WitkowskiK.PérodinJ.RemingtonC. L.HeadleyA. M.GanapatiN. E.2026. “First Responder Ladder of Community Engagement: Understanding Community-Facing Activities during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Urban Affairs48, no. 2: 662–84.
21.
CorbettE.DentonR.EreteS.2023. “Power and Public Participation in AI.” Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization, Boston, MA, 1–13. Association for Computing Machinery.
22.
CuttsS.FricanoR.PetersR.2024. “Environmental Justice for Whom? Citizen Participation and Brownfield Redevelopment in Downtown Birmingham, Alabama.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space7, no. 2: 583–608.
23.
DahlR.TufteE.1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford University Press.
24.
DeSantisV. S.HillD.2004. “Citizen Participation in Local Politics: Evidence from New England Town Meetings.” State & Local Government Review36, no. 3: 166–73.
25.
EbdonC.FranklinA. L.2006. “Citizen Participation in Budgeting Theory.” Public Administration Review66, no. 3: 437–47.
26.
ElyT. L.2015. “Government by Advice: Public Participation and Policymaking through Advisory Ballot Measures.” State & Local Government Review47, no. 2: 92–101.
27.
EscobarO.2017. “Making It Official: Participation Professionals and the Challenges of Institutionalizing Deliberative Democracy.” In The Professionalization of Public Participation, edited by BhererL.GauthierM.SimardL., 141–64. Routledge.
28.
EversoleR.2011. “Community Agency and Community Engagement: Re-Theorising Participation in Governance.” Journal of Public Policy31, no. 1: 51–71.
29.
FeldmanM. S.KhademianA. M.2007. “The Role of the Public Manager in Inclusion: Creating Communities of Participation.” Governance20, no. 2: 305–324.
30.
FiggeF.2004. “Bio-Folio: Applying Portfolio Theory to Biodiversity.” Biodiversity & Conservation13, no. 4: 827–49.
31.
FilnerM. F.2006. “The Limits of Participatory Empowerment: Assessing the Minneapolis Neighborhood Revitalization Program.” State & Local Government Review38, no. 2: 67–77.
32.
FungA.2003. “Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences.” Journal of Political Philosophy11, no. 3: 338–67.
33.
FungA.2006. “Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance.” Public Administration Review66, no. Suppl. 1: 66–75.
34.
FungA.2015. “Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future.” Public Administration Review75, no. 4: 513–22.
35.
GlaserM. A.YeagerS. J.ParkerL. E.2006. “Involving Citizens in the Decisions of Government and Community: Neighborhood-Based vs. Government-Based Citizen Engagement.” Public Administration Quarterly30, no. 1–2: 177–217.
36.
GodwinM. L.2014. “Civic Engagement and Fiscal Stress in American Cities: Insights from the Great Recession.” State & Local Government Review46, no. 4: 249–59.
37.
HillygusD. S.2005. “The Missing Link: Exploring the Relationship between Higher Education and Political Engagement.” Political Behavior27, no. 1: 25–47.
38.
HockS.AndersonS.PotoskiM.2013. “Invitation Phone Calls Increase Attendance at Civic Meetings: Evidence from a Field Experiment.” Public Administration Review73, no. 2: 221–8.
39.
HoppeR.2011. “Institutional Constraints and Practical Problems in Deliberative and Participatory Policy Making.” Policy & Politics39, no. 2: 163–86.
IrvinR. A.StansburyJ.2004. “Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort?” Public Administration Review64, no. 1: 55–65.
43.
JoS.NabatchiT.2021. “Different Processes, Different Outcomes? Assessing the Individual-Level Impacts of Public Participation.” Public Administration Review81, no. 1: 137–51.
44.
KasymovaJ.GaynorT. S.2014. “Effective Citizen Participation in Environmental Issues: What Can Local Governments Learn?” State & Local Government Review46, no. 2: 138–45.
45.
KoumouG. B.2020. “Diversification and Portfolio Theory: A Review.” Financial Markets and Portfolio Management34, no. 3: 267–312.
46.
KrahR. D. Y.MertensG.2020. “Transparency in Local Governments: Patterns and Practices of Twenty-First Century.” State & Local Government Review52, no. 3: 200–213.
47.
LeighningerM.2012. “Mapping Deliberative Civic Engagement: Pictures from a (R)evolution.” In Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement, edited by NabatchiT.GastilJ.WeiksnerM.LeighningerM., 19–39. Oxford University Press.
48.
LeighningerM.MannB. C.2011. Planning for Stronger Local Democracy: A Field Guide for Local Officials. National League of Cities.
49.
LobaoL.KellyP.2019. “Local Governments across the Rural–Urban Continuum: Findings from a Recent National County Government Study.” State & Local Government Review51, no. 4: 223–32.
50.
McDonnellJ.2020. “Municipality Size, Political Efficacy and Political Participation: A Systematic Review.” Local Government Studies46, no. 3: 331–50.
51.
MeyerP.McIntoshS.1992. “The USA Today Index of Ethnic Diversity.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research4, no. 1: 51–58.
52.
MichelsA.De GraafL.2010. “Examining Citizen Participation: Local Participatory Policy Making and Democracy.” Local Government Studies36, no. 4: 477–91.
53.
MIT Election Data and Science Lab. 2018. “County Presidential Returns 2000-2016.md.” County Presidential Election Returns 2000-2016, Harvard Dataverse, V6. doi:10.7910/DVN/VOQCHQ/GG18M2.
54.
NabatchiT.2012. “Putting the ‘Public’ Back in Public Values Research: Designing Participation to Identify and Respond to Values.” Public Administration Review72, no 5: 699–708.
55.
NabatchiT.AmslerL. B.2014. “Direct Public Engagement in Local Government.” The American Review of Public Administration44, no. Suppl. 4: 63S–88S.
56.
NabatchiT.ErtingerE.LeighningerM.2015. “The Future of Public Participation: Better Design, Better Laws, Better Systems.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly33, no. Suppl. 1: S35–44.
57.
NabatchiT.SancinoA.SiciliaM.2017. “Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction.” Public Administration Review77, no. 5: 766–76.
58.
NalbandianJ.2008. “Predicting the Future: Why Citizen Engagement No Longer is Optional.” Public Management90, no. 11: 35–37.
59.
NalbandianJ.O’NeillR.JrWilkesJ. M.KaufmanA.2013. “Contemporary Challenges in Local Government: Evolving Roles and Responsibilities, Structures, and Processes.” Public Administration Review73, no. 4: 567–74.
60.
OliverJ. E.2000. “City Size and Civic Involvement in Metropolitan America.” American Political Science Review94, no. 2: 361–73.
61.
PautR.SabatierR.TchamitchianM.2019. “Reducing Risk through Crop Diversification: An Application of Portfolio Theory to Diversified Horticultural Systems.” Agricultural Systems168:123–30.
62.
PerlmanB. J.2012. “Social Media Sites at the State and Local Levels: Operational Success and Governance Failure.” State & Local Government Review44, no. 1: 67–75.
63.
RoweG.FrewerL. J.2005. “A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms.” Science, Technology, & Human Values30, no. 2: 251–90.
64.
RupasinghaA.GoetzS. J.FreshwaterD.2006. “The Production of Social Capital in US Counties.” The Journal of Socioeconomics35, no. 1: 83–101.
SchaferJ. G.2019. “A Systematic Review of the Public Administration Literature to Identify How to Increase Public Engagement and Participation with Local Governance.” Journal of Public Affairs19, no. 2: e1873.
67.
ScottJ. K.2006. “‘E’ the People: Do U. S. Municipal Government Web Sites Support Public Involvement?” Public Administration Review66, no. 3: 341–53.
68.
ScottR. P.2019. “More Than Just Complaints: Generating Thick Engagement through Thin Participatory Programs.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance2, no. 2: 155–65.
69.
SharpE. B.2009. “Local Government, Social Programs, and Political Participation: A Test of Policy-Centered Theory.” State & Local Government Review41, no. 3: 182–92.
70.
ThomasJ. C.2012. Citizen, Customer, Partner: Engaging the Public in Public Management. Sharpe.
71.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2017. “American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates.” Retrieved February 1, 2021, from https://data.census.gov/cedsci/.
72.
Van HouwelingenP. 2017. “Political Participation and Municipal Population Size: A Meta-Study.” Local Government Studies43, no. 3: 408–428.
73.
VragaE.2016. “Party Differences in Political Content on Social Media.” Online Information Review40, no. 5: 595–609.
74.
WangJ.ZhuJ.2009. “Portfolio Theory of Information Retrieval.” Proceedings of the 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Boston, MA, July 19–23, 115–22. ACM.
75.
WangX.2001. “Assessing Public Participation in US Cities.” Public Performance & Management Review24, no. 4: 322–36.
76.
WilsonC.2022. “Public Engagement and AI: A Values Analysis of National Strategies.” Government Information Quarterly39, no. 1: 1–10.
77.
Working Group on Legal Frameworks for Public Participation. 2013. Making Public Participation Legal. National Civic League.
78.
YangK.CallahanK.2005. “Assessing Citizen Involvement Efforts by Local Governments.” Public Performance & Management Review29, no. 2: 191–216.
79.
YetanoA.RoyoS.2017. “Keeping Citizens Engaged: A Comparison between Online and Offline Participants.” Administration and Society49, no. 3: 394–422.
80.
ZeileisA.KleiberC.JackmanS.2008. “Regression Models for Count Data in R.” Journal of Statistical Software27, no. 8: 1–25. doi:10.18637/jss.v027.i08.
