Civic participation is a touchstone of American government, yet it has declined steadily over the past 50 years. Alongside changes in the relationship between American citizens and their government has been a stark increase in the levels of income and wealth concentration. While there is strong evidence that income inequality drives down participation at the national level, there have been fewer studies on the effects for local governments. This article studies the relationship between participation in departmental policy making and income inequality at the local level across the United States in a sample of small and mid-sized cities. When accounting for aspects of the government’s structure, local department culture, and community demographics, income inequality has a significant, though mixed, effect on civic participation. While changes in a community’s income inequality diminish the likelihood of citizens participating in government decision making, the present level of income inequality correlates with higher rates of engagement.
AbdiH.WilliamsL. J. (2010). Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2, 433-459. doi:10.1002/wics.101
2.
AbelsonJ.ForestP.-G.EylesJ.SmithP.MartinE.GauvinF.-P. (2003). Deliberations about deliberative methods: Issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 239-251. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00343-X
3.
AlesinaA.La FerraraE. (2000a, March). The determinants of trust (Working Paper No. 7621). The National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w7621
4.
AlesinaA.La FerraraE. (2000b). Participation in heterogeneous communities. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 847-904. doi:10.1162/003355300554935
5.
AndrewsR.BoyneG. A.LawJ.WalkerR. M. (2009). Centralization, organizational strategy, and public service performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 57-80. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum039
6.
BloomfieldD.CollinsK.FryC.MuntonR. (2001). Deliberation and inclusion: Vehicles for increasing trust in UK public governance?Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19, 501-513. doi:10.1068/c6s
7.
BovairdT. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67, 846-860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
8.
BowlerS.DonovanT. (2000). Demanding choices: Opinion, voting, and direct democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9.
BrewerG. A. (2003). Building social capital: Civic attitudes and behavior of public Servants. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 5-26. doi:10.1093/jpart/mug011
10.
BurbyR. J. (2003). Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, 33-49. doi:10.1080/01944360308976292
11.
BurkeE. M. (1968). Citizen participation strategies. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 34, 287-294. doi:10.1080/01944366808977547
12.
CaseyT.ChristK. (2005). Social capital and economic performance in the American states. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 826-845. doi:10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00358.x
13.
DahlR. A. (1967). The city in the future of democracy. American Political Science Review, 61, 953-970. doi:10.2307/1953398
14.
DahlR. A. (1994). A democratic dilemma: System effectiveness versus citizen participation. Political Science Quarterly, 109, 23-34. doi:10.2307/2151659
15.
DaltonR. J. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56, 76-98. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.x
16.
DaltonR. J. (2013). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
17.
DamanpourF. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. The Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555-590. doi:10.2307/256406
18.
DayD. (1997). Citizen participation in the planning process: An essentially contested concept?Journal of Planning Literature, 11, 421-434. doi:10.1177/088541229701100309
19.
DonovanT.KarpJ. A. (2006). Popular support for direct democracy. Party Politics, 12, 671-688. doi:10.1177/1354068806066793
20.
EastonD. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York, NY: John Wiley.
21.
FairbrotherM.MartinI. W. (2013). Does inequality erode social trust? Results from multilevel models of US states and counties. Social Science Research, 42, 347-360. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.09.008
22.
FischerF. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23.
FlavinP. (2012). Income inequality and policy representation in the American states. American Politics Research, 40, 29-59. doi:10.1177/1532673X11416920
24.
FungA. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75, 513-522. doi:10.1111/puar.12361
25.
GastilJ.DeessE. P.WeiserP. (2002). Civic awakening in the jury room: A test of the connection between jury deliberation and political participation. Journal of Politics, 64, 585-595. doi:10.1111/1468-2508.00141
26.
HackerJ. S.PiersonP. (2010). Winner-take-all politics: How Washington made the rich richer—and turned its back on the middle class. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
27.
HaeberleS. H. (1987). Neighborhood identity and citizen participation. Administration & Society, 19, 178-196. doi:10.1177/009539978701900203
28.
HajnalZ. L.LewisP. G. (2003). Municipal institutions and voter turnout in local elections. Urban Affairs Review, 38, 645-668. doi:10.1177/1078087403038005002
29.
HauserS. M. (2000). Education, ability, and civic engagement in the contemporary United States. Social Science Research, 29, 556-582. doi:10.1006/ssre.2000.0681
30.
HibbingJ. R.Theiss-MorseE. (2001). Process preferences and American politics: What the people want government to be. The American Political Science Review, 95, 145-153.
31.
HillK. Q.LeighleyJ. E. (1999). Racial diversity, voter turnout, and mobilizing institutions in the United States. American Politics Quarterly, 27, 275-295. doi:10.1177/1532673X99027003001
32.
InnesJ. E.BooherD. E. (2003). Collaborative policymaking: Governance through dialogue. In HajerM. A.WagenaarH. (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (pp. 33-59). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
InnesJ. E.BooherD. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5, 419-436. doi:10.1080/1464935042000293170
34.
IrvinR. A.StansburyJ. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort?Public Administration Review, 64, 55-65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
35.
KahnM.CostaD. (2003). Understanding the American decline in social capital, 1952–1998. Kyklos, 56, 17-46. doi:10.1111/1467-6435.00208
36.
KirlinJ. J.KirlinM. K. (2002). Strengthening effective government–citizen connections through greater civic engagement. Public Administration Review, 62, 80-85. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.62.s1.14
37.
KweitM. G.KweitR. W. (1984). The politics of policy analysis: The role of citizen participation in analytic decision making. Policy Studies Review, 3, 234-245.
38.
LanceeB.Van de WerfhorstH. G. (2012). Income inequality and participation: A comparison of 24 European countries. Social Science Research, 41, 1166-1178. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.04.005
LiaoY.ZhangY. (2012). Citizen participation in local budgeting: Mechanisms, political support, and city manager’s moderating role. International Review of Public Administration, 17(2), 19-38. doi:10.1080/12294659.2012.10805226
41.
MergelI.BretschneiderS. I. (2013). A three-stage adoption process for social media use in government. Public Administration Review, 73, 390-400. doi:10.1111/puar.12021
42.
MeschG. S.SchwirianK. P. (1996). The effectiveness of neighborhood collective action. Social Problems, 43, 467-483. doi:10.2307/3096955
43.
MichelsA. (2011). Innovations in democratic governance: How does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy?International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77, 275-293. doi:10.1177/0020852311399851
44.
MichelsA.De GraafL. (2010). Examining citizen participation: Local participatory policy making and democracy. Local Government Studies, 36, 477-491. doi:10.1080/03003930.2010.494101
45.
MorettiE. (2012). The new geography of jobs. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
46.
MossbergerK.TolbertC. J.McNealR. S. (2007). Digital citizenship: The internet, society, and participation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
47.
MoynihanD. P. (2003). Normative and instrumental perspectives on public participation: Citizen summits in Washington, DC. The American Review of Public Administration, 33, 164-188. doi:10.1177/0275074003251379
48.
NachmiasC.PalenJ. J. (1982). Membership in voluntary neighborhood associations and urban revitalization. Policy Sciences, 14, 179-193. doi:10.1007/BF00137116
49.
NelsonN.WrightS. (1995). Power and participatory development: Theory and practice. ITDG Publishing. Retrieved from http://research.gold.ac.uk/11803/
50.
NorrisP. (2004). Electoral engineering: Voting rules and political behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
OliverJ. E. (1999). The effects of metropolitan economic segregation on local civic participation. American Journal of Political Science, 43, 186-212. doi:10.2307/2991790
52.
OliverJ. E. (2000). City size and civic involvement in metropolitan America. The American Political Science Review, 94, 361-373. doi:10.2307/2586017
53.
PutnamR. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
54.
RaineyH. G. (2009). Understanding and managing public organizations. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
55.
RupasinghaA.GoetzS. J.FreshwaterD. (2006). The production of social capital in US counties. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 83-101. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.001
56.
SkocpolT.FiorinaM. P. (2004). Civic engagement in American democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
57.
SoltF. (2008). Economic inequality and democratic political engagement. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 48-60. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00298.x
58.
SoltF. (2010). Does economic inequality depress electoral participation? Testing the Schattschneider hypothesis. Political Behavior, 32, 285-301. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9106-0
59.
StockemerD.ScruggsL. (2012). Income inequality, development and electoral turnout—New evidence on a burgeoning debate. Electoral Studies, 31, 764-773. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2012.06.006
60.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH.NieN. H. (1993). Citizen activity: Who participates? What do they say?The American Political Science Review, 87, 303-318. doi:10.2307/2939042
61.
WarrenA. M.SulaimanA.JaafarN. I. (2014). Social media effects on fostering online civic engagement and building citizen trust and trust in institutions. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 291-301. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.11.007
62.
YangK.CallahanK. (2007). Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness: Participatory values, stakeholder pressures, and administrative practicality. Public Administration Review, 67, 249-264. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00711.x
63.
YangK.PandeyS. K. (2011). Further dissecting the black box of citizen participation: When does citizen involvement lead to good outcomes?Public Administration Review, 71, 880-892. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02417.x
64.
ZhangY.YangK. (2009). Citizen participation in the budget process: The effect of city managers. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 21, 289-317.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
