This study examines social equity in budgeting, focusing on the process and access dimensions of equity through public engagement. Using data from surveys of finance directors and interviews with public managers in a sample of California cities, the study adopts a mixed-methods approach. The quantitative analysis shows that the level and diversity of public engagement in budgeting in the sample cities are low and associated with the overall level and diversity of engagement in the policy making, suggesting process inequality. In addition, the qualitative analysis identifies significant access barriers to budgeting, indicating access inequality, and highlights the efforts by the sample cities to address these inequities.
AugsbergerAstraCollinsMary E.GeckerWhitneyLuskKatieZhaoQingjian J.2017. “‘She Treated Us Like We Bring Valid Ideas to the Table:’ Youth Experiences of a Youth-Led Participatory Budgeting Process.” Children and Youth Services Review76:243–49. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.02.025.
4.
BeachBrianJonesDaniel B.2017. “Gridlock: Ethnic Diversity in Government and the Provision of Public Goods.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy9, no. 3: 112–36. doi:10.1257/pol.20150394.
5.
BlessettBrandiDodgeJenniferEdmondBeverly, et al. 2019. “Social Equity in Public Administration: A Call to Action.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance2, no. 4: 283–99. doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvz016.
6.
ClarkBenjamin Y.GuzmanTatyana S.2016. “Does Technologically Enabled Public Participation Lead to Budget Adjustments? An Investigation of Boston, MA, and San Francisco, CA.” The American Review of Public Administration47:945–61. doi:10.1177/0275074016642568.
7.
EbdonCarolFranklinAimee L.2006. “Citizen Participation in Budgeting Theory.” Public Administration Review66, no. 3: 437–47.
8.
FlavinPatrick. 2012. “Income Inequality and Policy Representation in the American States.” American Politics Research40, no. 1: 29–59.
9.
GodwinMarcia L.2021. “Collaboration in Public Budgeting.” In Handbook of Collaborative Public Management, edited by MeekJ. W., 213–27. Edward Elgar Publishing.
10.
GoodenSusan T.2015a. “PAR’s Social Equity Footprint.” Public Administration Review75, no. 3: 372–81. doi:10.1111/puar.12346.
11.
GoodenSusan T.2015b. “From Equality to Social Equity.” In Public Administration Evolving: From Foundations to the Future, edited by GuyM. E.RubinM. M., 211–30. Routledge.
12.
GoodenSusan T.2017. “Frances Harriet Williams: Unsung Social Equity Pioneer.” Public Administration Review77, no. 5: 777–83. doi:10.1111/puar.12788.
13.
GordonVictoriaGordonJeffery L.Jr.BodenDavid. 2017. “The Role of Public Participation and the Use of Social Media Platforms in the Participatory Budgeting Process.” International Journal of Public Administration40, no. 1: 65–76. doi:10.1080/01900692.2015.1072215.
14.
GuzmánJuan Pablo Martínez. 2024. “Can Gender-Responsive Budgeting Change How Governments Budget? Lessons from the Case of Ecuador.” Public Administration102, no. 2: 388–404. doi:10.1111/padm.12926.
15.
GuzmánJuan Pablo MartínezJordanMeagan M.JoycePhilip G.2024. “Towards Inclusive Public Administration Systems: Public Budgeting from the Perspective of Critical Race Theory.” Public Administration102, no. 3: 797–814. doi:10.1111/padm.12956.
16.
HatcherWilliam. 2015. “The Efficacy of Public Participation in Municipal Budgeting: An Exploratory Survey of Officials in Government Finance Officers Association’s Award-Winning Cities.” Public Administration Quarterly39, no. 4: 645–63.
17.
HumphreyNatalie M.PortilloShannonMichaudKristina. 2024. “Managing Social Equity: Insights from Local Public Managers.” State and Local Government Review56, no. 4: 393–402. doi:10.1177/0160323X241281515.
18.
JacobBrianLudwigJens. 2008. Improving Educational Outcomes for Poor Children. National Bureau of Economic Research.
19.
JohnsonNorman J.SvaraJames H.2011. Justice for All: Promoting Social Equity in Public Administration. M. E. Sharpe.
20.
JohnsonNorman J.SvaraJames H.2015a. “Social Equity in American Society and Public Administration.” In Justice for All: Promoting Social Equity in Public Administration, edited by JohnsonN. J.SvaraJ. H., 3–25. Routledge.
21.
JohnsonNorman J.SvaraJames H.2015b. “Toward a More Perfect Union: Moving Forward with Social Equity.” In Justice for All: Promoting Social Equity in Public Administration, edited by JohnsonN. J.SvaraJ. H., 265–90. Routledge.
22.
KavanaghShayneKowalskiJohn. 2021. “The Basics of Equity in Budgeting.” Government Finance Review37, no. 1: 18–27.
23.
KuennekeAshleyScutelnicuGabriela. 2021. “How Successful Is Participatory Budgeting in Promoting Social Equity? Evidence from New York City.” Public Administration Quarterly45, no. 4: 370–91. doi:10.37808/paq.45.4.2.
LeighningerMatt. 2014. “What We’re Talking about When We Talk about the ‘Civic Field’ (And Why We Should Clarify What We Mean).” Journal of Public Deliberation10, no. 1: 8. doi:10.16997/jdd.186.
26.
McDonaldBruce D.McCandlessSusan. 2022. “Incorporating Social Equity.” In Teaching Public Budgeting and Finance: A Practical Guide, edited by McDonaldB. D.JordanM. M., 236–56. Routledge.
27.
MingersJohn. 2001. “Combining is Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology.” Information Systems Research12:240–59.
28.
MingersJohnMutchAlistairWillcocksLeslie. 2013. “Critical Realism in Information Systems Research.” MIS Quarterly37:795–802.
29.
MitchellDavidBoydKaelanJordanMeagan. 2025. “An Engaging Opportunity: The Promise of Enhanced Public Engagement for Priority-Based Budgeting.” Public Finance Journal2, no. 2: 142–59. doi:10.59469/pfj.2025.61.
30.
NeshkovaMilena I.GuoHai. 2012. “Public Participation and Organizational Performance: Evidence from State Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory22, no. 2: 267–88. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur038.
31.
OhYoungminJeongSeong-hoShinHeontae. 2019. “A Strategy for a Sustainable Local Government: Are Participatory Governments More Efficient, Effective, and Equitable in the Budget Process?” Sustainability11, no. 19: 5312. doi:10.3390/su11195312.
32.
PetersonPaul E.1981. City Limits. University of Chicago Press.
33.
RubinMarilyn M.BartleJohn R.2023a. “Equity in Public Budgeting: Lessons for the United States.” Journal of Social Equity and Public Administration1, no. 2: 11–25. doi:10.24926/jsepa.v1i2.4995.
34.
RubinMarilyn M.BartleJohn R.2023b. “Gender-Responsive Budgeting: A Budget Reform to Address Gender Inequity.” Public Administration101, no. 2: 391–405. doi:10.1111/padm.12802.
35.
VillegasAna MaríaDavisDanné E.2008. “Preparing Teachers of Color to Confront Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Educational Outcomes.” In Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, edited by Cochran-SmithM.Feiman-NemserS.McIntyreD. J.DemersK. E., 583–605. Routledge.
36.
WangXiaohu. 2015. “Assessing Public Participation in US Cities.” In The Age of Direct Public Participation, edited by RobertsN. C., 401–415. Routledge.
37.
WeiWenchi. 2025. “Political Accountability and Social Equity in Public Budgeting: Examining the Role of Local Institutions.” Public Administration Review85, no. 5: 1528–45.
38.
ZhangYahongYangKaifeng. 2009. “Citizen Participation in the Budget Process: The Effect of City Managers.” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management21, no. 2: 289–317.
