Political monopolies seek to control who wins elections. We analyze 20 years of election data from Nassau, Suffolk, and Westchester Counties in New York to explore the degree to which a single party exhibits monopolistic behavior at the town level, focusing on primary competition and the use of appointments. In Suffolk and Westchester, most officials gain office via regular elections with some intra-party competition in partisan primaries. In Nassau, however, nearly 50% of town councilmembers first assume office through appointments, allowing appointees to enjoy a subsequent incumbency advantage in their first election. Partisan primaries are also exceedingly rare in Nassau, with just one primary for town council over a 20-year period. Our findings are particularly applicable to the Towns of Hempstead and Oyster Bay. This pattern aligns with characterizations of Nassau’s political landscape, where the Republican Party has shaped governance since the county’s emergence as America’s first suburb.
AnechiaricoFrankJacobsJames B.1994. “Visions of Corruption Control and the Evolution of American Public Administration.” Public administration review54 (5): 465.
2.
AnziaSarah F.2013. Timing & Turnout: How Off-cycle Elections Favor Organized Groups. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BridgesAmy. 1999. Morning Glories: Municipal Reform in the Southwest. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
BurnettCraig M.2017. Government and Politics in New York State. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.
5.
CaroRobert A.1974. The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York. New York, NY: Alfred A Knopf Incorporated.
6.
CoxGary W.McCubbinsMathew D.1986. “Electoral Politics as a Redistributive Game.” The Journal of Politics48 (2): 370–89.
7.
de Benedictis-KessnerJustin. 2018. “Off-cycle and Out of Office: Election Timing and the Incumbency Advantage.” The Journal of Politics80 (1): 119–32.
8.
Dudkiewicz-ClaymanLillian. 2019. Life of the Party: Unions and the Making of the Moderate Republican Party in Nassau County, New York. Diss, Rutgers University, School of Graduate Studies, New Brunswick, NJ.
9.
ElazarDaniel Judah. 1972. American Federalism: A View from the States. New York, NY: Crowell.
10.
ErieSteven P.1990. Rainbow’s End: Irish-Americans and the Dilemmas of Urban Machine Politics, 1840-1985. Vol. 15. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
11.
ErieSteven P.2006. Beyond Chinatown: The Metropolitan Water District, Growth, and the Environment in Southern California. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
ErieSteven P.KoganVladimirMacKenzieScott A.2011. Paradise Plundered: Fiscal Crisis and Governance Failures in San Diego. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
FandosNicholas. 2024. “In the Land of George Santos, Machine Politics Fuels a G.O.P. Revival after Decades in Decline.” The New York Times.
14.
FerretteCandice. 2018. “James Coll Enters Another Republican Primary in Nassau County.” Newsday, July15.
15.
FishbeinDaniel Chase. 2016. “300 Governments: Understanding Intermunicipal Collaboration in Nassau County, NY and Policies of Forced Efficiency in New York State.” Touro Law Review32:535.
GoldmacherShane. 2017. “How Party Bosses, Not Voters, Pick Candidates in New York.” The New York Times, September18.
18.
HajnalZoltanTrounstineJessica. 2005. “Where Turnout Matters: The Consequences of Uneven Turnout in City Politics.” The Journal of Politics67 (2): 515–35.
19.
HarrisonMarjorie Freeman. 2005. Machine Politics Suburban Style: J. Russel Sprague and the Nassau County Republican Party at Midcentury. New York, NY: Columbia University.
20.
LachmanSeymour P.PolnerRobert. 2017. Failed State: Dysfunction and Corruption in an American Statehouse. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
LynnFrank. 1987. “Suffolk Fills Post in Nassau Style.” The New York Times, April5.
23.
Matter of Fochtman v Coll, Appellate Division, Second Department. 2017. Supreme Court of New York, September11.
24.
McCulloughDavid. 2003. Truman. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
25.
Newsday Editorial Board. 2019. “On Long Island, Patronage Breeds Corruption.” Newsday, August12.
26.
O’SheaJohn E.1965. History of the Town of North Hempstead. Manhasset, NY: Town of North Hempstead.
27.
RosenbaumHerbert D.1968. “The Political Consequences of Suburban Growth: A Case Study of Nassau County, New York.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
28.
ShufeldtGregoryFlavinPatrick. 2012. “Two Distinct Concepts: Party Competition in Government and Electoral Competition in the American States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly12 (3): 330–42.
29.
SteffensLincoln. 1904. The Shame of the Cities. New York, NY: McClure, Phillips & Company.
30.
TeafordJon C.2020. Post-Suburbia: Government and Politics in the Edge Cities. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31.
TolbertPamela S.ZuckerLynne G.1983. “Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935.” Administrative Science Quarterly28:22–39.
32.
TrounstineJessica. 2009. Political Monopolies in American Cities: The Rise and Fall of Bosses and Reformers. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
TrounstineJessica. 2011. “Evidence of a Local Incumbency Advantage.” Legislative Studies Quarterly36 (2): 255–80.
34.
TrounstineJessica. 2013. “Turnout and Incumbency in Local Elections.” Urban Affairs Review49 (2): 167–89.
35.
WolfingerRaymond E.1972. “Why Political Machines Have Not Withered Away and Other Revisionist Thoughts.” The Journal of Politics34 (2): 365–98.
