Maryland passed groundbreaking state planning legislation 25 years ago. The state’s renowned Smart Growth program applied uniformly to urban and rural jurisdictions across the state. This study presents results from a 2023 survey that explores perceptions of the program across the urban-rural divide in Maryland. Most all respondents believe smart growth has not achieved its goals but remains relevant in Maryland. Urban and rural respondents are divided, though, when it comes to support for revising the original goals to incorporate current priorities, particularly climate change and social equity. Overall, Maryland planners feel they have not made sufficient progress toward achieving the objectives of smart growth and recognize that more must be done on equity, climate change, and more. For planners from Maryland and elsewhere, these findings indicate that while state-level planning can be fruitful, it requires localized nuance and acknowledgement of differing priorities and needs between urban and rural communities.
AccordinoJohn. 2019. “Introduction to Bridging the ‘Urban–Rural Divide.’”State & Local Government Review51 (4): 217–22.
2.
BagchiAnn D.2019. “Expansion of Telehealth Across the Rural–Urban Continuum.” State & Local Government Review51 (4): 250–58.
3.
BosselmanFredCalliesDavid. 1971. “The Quiet Revolution in Land Use Control.” Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED067272.
4.
BurbyRaymond J.MayPeter J.1997. Making Governments Plan: State Experiments in Managing Land Use. JHU Press.
5.
CohenJ. R.2002. “Maryland’s ‘Smart Growth’: Using Incentives to Combat Sprawl. In: Urban Sprawl: Causes, Consequences and Policy Responses.” Publication of: Urban Institute. https://trid.trb.org/View/690226.
6.
CroweJessica. 2011. “Rural Perceptions of Growth Management Legislation on Rural Economic Development: Welcoming Comrade or Hostile Foe?”Society & Natural Resources24 (3): 221–41. doi:10.1080/08941920903580243.
7.
DabsonBrian. 2019. “Regional Solutions for Rural and Urban Challenges.” State & Local Government Review51 (4): 283–91.
DavisStephanie D.GoughMeghan Z.2019. “Deepening Interlocal Partnerships: The Case of Revenue-Sharing Infrastructure Agreements.” State & Local Government Review51 (4): 292–300.
10.
DeGroveJohn Melvin. 2005. Planning Policy and Politics. Cambridge, Mass: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
DeGroveMiness. 1992. The New Frontier for Land Policy: *planning and Growth Management in the States. Cambridge, Mass.: Lincoln Institute of land policy.
13.
FrankKathryn I.ReissSean A.2014. “The Rural Planning Perspective at an Opportune Time.” Journal of Planning Literature29 (4): 386–402. doi:10.1177/0885412214542050.
14.
GallardoRoberto. 2019. “Bringing Communities into the Digital Age.” State & Local Government Review51 (4): 233–41.
15.
GilothRobert. 2019. “Workforce Policy for the Future: Connecting Skills and Careers.” State & Local Government Review51 (4): 267–74.
HealyRobert G.RosenbergJohn S.2011. Land Use and the States. 2nd ed. RFF Natural Resource Management Set. New York: Routledge.
19.
HibbardMichaelFrankKathryn I.2024. “Bringing Rurality Back to Planning Culture.” Journal of Planning Education and Research44 (3): 1212–22. doi:10.1177/0739456X211048933.
20.
HubbardMonica L.CastellanoRebecca L. Som. 2023. “Rural and Urban Difference in the Acceptance of Alternative Water Management Strategies: Case Study of Idaho Residents.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management149 (6): 05023003. doi:10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-5503.
21.
KnoxClaire ConnollyRiveraJason D.2023. “Inclusionary Emergency Management Planning: Floridian Emergency Management Planners’ Orientations and Perceptions.” State and Local Government Review55 (3): 192–212. doi:10.1177/0160323X231171731.
22.
LewisRebeccaKnaapGerrit-Jan. 2012. “Targeting Spending for Land Conservation.” Journal of the American Planning Association78 (1): 34–52. doi:10.1080/01944363.2011.645275.
23.
LewisRebeccaKnaapGerrit-JanSohnJungyul. 2009. “Managing Growth With Priority Funding Areas: A Good Idea Whose Time Has Yet to Come.” Journal of the American Planning Association75 (September):457–78. doi:10.1080/01944360903192560.
24.
LobaoLindaKellyPaige. 2019. “Local Governments across the Rural–Urban Continuum: Findings from a Recent National County Government Study.” State & Local Government Review51 (4): 223–32.
25.
LockeChristina M.RissmanAdena R.2015. “Factors Influencing Zoning Ordinance Adoption in Rural and Exurban Townships.” Landscape and Urban Planning134 (February):167–76. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.002.
26.
McFarlandChristiana. 2019. “Strengthening Intra-Regional Connectivity: Implications for Bridging the Urban–Rural Divide.” State and Local Government Review51 (4): 259–66. doi:10.1177/0160323X20922297.
MosleyJeffrey. 2019. “Community Development Financial Institutions: Invaluable Capital Partners in Low-Income Rural Areas.” State & Local Government Review51 (4): 275–82.
29.
PuttickRuthFiedlerLisa MaeParkJennifer. 2022. “Diffusion of Data-Driven Practices: How the Opinion Leading U.S. Cities Are Advancing the Use of Data in Local Government.” State and Local Government Review54 (1): 52–67. doi:10.1177/0160323X221088017.
30.
ShenQingZhangFeng. 2007. “Land-Use Changes in a Pro-Smart-Growth State: Maryland, USA.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space39 (6): 1457–77. doi:10.1068/a3886.
SteelBrent S.LovrichNicholas P.2000. “Growth Management Policy and County Government: Correlates of Policy Adoption across the United States.” State & Local Government Review32 (1): 7–19.
34.
TateScottKhademianAnne. 2019. “University-Anchored Partnerships That Reimagine the Urban–Rural Divide.” State & Local Government Review51 (4): 301–9.
35.
WeitzJerry. 1999. “From Quiet Revolution to Smart Growth: State Growth Management Programs, 1960 to 1999.” Journal of Planning Literature14 (2): 266–337. doi:10.1177/08854129922092694.
36.
WeitzJerry. 2012. “Growth Management in the United States, 2000–2010: A Decennial Review and Synthesis.” Journal of Planning Literature27 (4): 394–433. doi:10.1177/0885412212451030.
