This study employed a national data set obtained from the U. S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to answer two questions. Are women adequately represented in the top-level positions in state bureaucracies and are impediments that women might encounter in reaching the highest level administrative posts related to the policy missions and/or organizational characteristics of these agencies? The authors found that (a) women are underrepresented in top-level administrative and professional positions in distributive and regulatory agencies, suggesting the continued presence of glass ceilings in such agencies; (b) women are better represented among administrative and especially professional cadres in redistributive agencies, however their full representation at the uppermost administrative levels remains an unrealized goal; and (c) women are less well represented in higher paying positions (in proportion to their numbers in the agency) in agencies with higher salaries.
Aguinis, H., & Adams, S. K. R. (1998). Social-role versus structural models of gender and influence use in organizations. Group and Organization Management, 23(4), 414-446.
2.
Aguirre, A. (2000). Women and minority faculty in the academic workplace: Recruitment, retention and academic culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Baron, J. N., & Newman, M. A. (1989). Pay the man: Effects of demographic composition on prescribed wage rates in the California civil service. In R. T. Michaels, H. I. Hartmann, & B. O’Farrell (Eds.), Pay equity: Empirical inquiries (pp. 107-130). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4.
Bayes, J. H. (1991). Women in public administration in the United States. Women and Politics, 11, 85-109.
5.
Brass, D. J., & Burkhardt, M. E. (1993). Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 441-470.
6.
Brudney, J., Hebert, T. F., & Wright, D. S. (1999). Reinventing government in the American states: Measuring and explaining administrative reform. Public Administration Review, 59, 19-30.
7.
Bullard, A. M., & Wright, D. S. (1993). Circumventing the glass ceiling: Women executives in American state governments. Public Administration Review, 53, 189-202.
8.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1998). State and local government, excluding education and hospitals. Available at http://stats.bls.gov/oco/cg/pdf/cgs042.pdf
9.
Cayer, N. J., & Sigelman, L. (1980). Minorities and women in state and local government: 1973-1975. Public Administration Review, 40, 443-450.
10.
Cornwell, C., & Kellough, J. E. (1994). Women and minorities in federal government agencies: Examining new evidence from panel data. Public Administration Review, 54, 265-276.
11.
Corson, J. J., & Paul, R. S. (1966). Men near the top. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12.
Crum, J., & Naff, K. C. (1997). Looking like America: The continuing importance of affirmative action in federal employment. Public Productivity and Management Review, 20, 272-287.
13.
Daley, D. (1994). Attribution theory and the glass ceiling: Career development among federal employees. Public Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal, 1(1). Available at www.hbg.psu.edu/Faculty/jxr11/glass1sp.html
14.
Dolan, J. (2000). Influencing policy at the top of the federal bureaucracy: A comparison of career and political senior executives. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 573-581.
15.
Dometrius, N. C., & Sigelman, L. (1997). Organizational regeneration reconsidered: Women in state and local government, 1980-1990. American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 333-338.
16.
Elling, R. C. (1990). Bureaucracy. In V. Gray, H. Jacob, & K. Vines (Eds.), Politics in the American states (5th ed., pp. 287-331). Boston: Little, Brown.
17.
Ferree, M. M., & McQuillan, J. (1998). Gender-based pay gaps: Methodological and policy issues in university salary studies. Gender & Society, 12(1), 7-39.
18.
Froman, L. (1968). The categorization of policy contents. In A. Ranney (Ed.), Political science and public policy (pp. 41-52). Chicago: Markham.
19.
Glass Ceiling Commission. (n.d.). Available at www.ilr.cornell.edu/library/e_archive/gov_reports/glassceiling/default.html?page=about
20.
Guy, M. E. (2002). Women in management. In S. W. Hayes & R. C. Kearney (Eds.), Public personnel administration: Problems and prospects (4th ed., pp. 232-246). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
Guy, M. E., & Duerst-Lahti, G. (1992). Agency culture and its effect on managers. In M. E. Guy(Ed.), Women and men of the states: Public administrators at the state level (pp. 157-188). New York: M. E. Sharpe.
22.
Jacobsen, J. (1994). The economics of gender. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
23.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
24.
Kaufman, H. (1960). The forest ranger. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25.
Kearney, R. C., & Sellers, H. (1996). Sex on the docket: Reports of state task forces on gender bias. Public Administration Review, 56(6), 587-592.
26.
Kellough, J. E. (1989). Federal equal employment opportunity policy and numerical goals and timetables. New York: Praeger.
27.
Kelly, R. M., Guy, M. E., Bayes, J., Duerst-Lahti, G., Duke, L. L., Hale, M. M., et al. (1991).Public managers in the states: A comparison of career advancement by sex. Public Administration Review, 51, 402-412.
28.
Kelly, R. M., & Marin, A. J. D. (1998). Position power and women’s career advancement. Women in Management Review, 13(2), 53-66.
29.
Kerr, B., Miller, W., & Reid, M. (2000, March). Sex-based occupational segregation in U. S. state bureaucracies, 1987-1997. Paper presented at the Southwest Social Science Association meeting, Galveston, TX.
30.
Kerr, B., Miller, W., & Reid, M. (2002). Sex-based occupational segregation in U.S. state bureaucracies, 1987-1997. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 412-423.
31.
Korac-Kakabadse, N., & Kouzmin, A. (1997). Maintaining the rage: From glass-ceilings and metaphorical sex changes to psychological audits and renegotiating organizational scripts (part 1). Women in Management Review, 12(5), 182-195.
32.
Leonard, J. S. (1989). Women and affirmative action. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(Winter), 61-75.
33.
Lewis, G. B. (1997). Race, sex, and performance ratings in the federal service. Public Administration Review, 57(6), 479-489.
34.
Lewis, G. B., & Emmert, M. A. (1986). The sexual division of labor in federal employment. Social Science Quarterly, 67, 143-156.
35.
Lewis, G. B., & Nice, D. (1994). Race, sex, and occupational segregation in state and local governments. American Review of Public Administration, 24, 393-410.
36.
Lowi, T. (1964). American business, public policy, case studies, and political theory. World Politics, 16, 677-715.
37.
Lowi, T. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32(4), 298-310.
38.
Lowi, T. (1985). The state in politics: The relation between policy and administration. In R. Noll (Ed.), Regulatory policy and the social sciences (pp. 67-104). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
39.
Mani, B. G. (1997). Gender and the federal senior executive service: Where is the glass ceiling?Public Personnel Management, 26, 545-558.
40.
McCabe, B. C., & Stream, C. (2000). Diversity by the numbers: Changes in state and local government workforces, 1980-1995. Public Personnel Management, 29(1), 93-106
41.
Milem, F. F., & Astin, H. S. (1993). The changing composition of the faculty. Change, 25(2), 21-27.
42.
Miller, W., Kerr, J. B., & Reid, M. F. (1999). A national study of gender-based occupational segregation in municipal bureaucracies: Persistence of glass walls?Public Administration Review, 59, 218-230.
43.
Mills, A., & Tancred, P. (1992). Gendering organizational analysisNewbury Park, CA: Sage.
44.
Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
Mladenka, K. (1991). Public employee unions, reformism, and Black employment in 1200 American cities. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 26, 532-548.
46.
Moore, G. (1987). Women in the old-boy network. In G. W. Domhoff & T. R. Dye (Eds.), Power elites and organizations (pp. 63-84). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47.
Moore, P., & Mazey, M. E. (1986). Minorities and women in state and local government: 1973-1980. Journal of Urban Affairs, 8, 1-13.
48.
Naff, K. C. (1994). Through the glass ceiling: Prospects of the advancement of women in the federal service. Public Administration Review, 54, 507-514.
49.
Newman, M. A. (1993). Career advancement: Does gender make a difference?American Review of Public Administration, 23, 361-384.
50.
Newman, M. A. (1994). Gender and Lowi’s thesis: Implications for career advancement. Public Administration Review, 54, 277-284.
51.
Newman, M. A. (1996). Equal employment opportunity and glass ceilings: A contradiction in terms?Public Administration Quarterly, 19(4), 420-435.
52.
Osborne, D. (1988). Laboratories of democracy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
53.
Perry, E. L., Davis-Blake, A., & Kulik, C. T. (1994). Explaining gender-based selection decisions: A synthesis of contextual and cognitive approaches. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 786-821.
54.
Pfeffer, J., & Davis-Blake, A. (1987). The effect of the proportion of women on salaries: The case of college administrators. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 1-24.
55.
Powell, G. N. (1993). Women and men in management. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
56.
Reid, M. F., Kerr, J. B., & Miller, W. (2000). A study of the advancement of women in municipal government bureaucracies: Persistence of glass ceilings?Women and Politics, 21(1), 35-53.
57.
Reskin, B., & Roos, P. A. (1990). Job queues, gender queues. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
58.
Riccucci, N. M. (1986). Female and minority employment in city government: The role of unions. Policy Studies Journal, 15, 3-16.
59.
Riccucci, N. M., & Saidel, J. R. (1997). The representativeness of state-level bureaucratic leaders: A piece of the representative bureaucracy puzzle. Public Administration Review, 57(5), 423-430.
60.
Rinehart, S. T. (1991). Do women leaders make a difference? Substance, style, and perceptions. In D. Dodson (Ed.), Gender and policymaking: Studies of women in office (pp. 93-102). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Center for the American Woman and Politics.
61.
Ripley, R. B., & Franklin, G. A. (1990). Congress, the bureaucracy, and public policy (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
62.
Rizzo, A., & Mendez, C. (1990). The integration of women in management: A guide for human resources and management development specialists. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
63.
Saltzstein, G. H. (1986). Female mayors andwomen in municipal jobs. American Journal of Political Science, 64, 140-164.
64.
Schott, R. L. (1991). Administrative and organizational behavior. Administration & Society, 23(1), 54-73.
65.
Sigelman, L., & Dometrius, N. C. (1986). Organization regeneration and political change: A model with applications to affirmative action. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 79-107.
66.
Stein, L. (1986). Representative local government: Minorities in the municipal workforce. Journal of Politics, 48, 694-713.
67.
Tomaskovic-Devey, D., Kalleberg, A. L., & Marsden, P. V. (1996). Organizational patterns of gender segregation. In A. L. Kalleberg, D. Knoke, P. V. Marsden, & J. L. Spaeth (Eds.), Organizations in America (pp. 276-301). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68.
U.S. Department of Justice. (1998). Women in criminal justice: A twenty year report. Available at www.ojp.usdoj.gov/reprots/98Guides/wcjs98/
69.
U.S. Department of Labor. (1991). A report on the glass ceiling initiative. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
70.
Van Horn, C. E. (1989). The state of the states. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
71.
Walker, S. (1985). Racial minority and female employment in policing: The implications of glacial change. Crime & Delinquency, 31, 555-572.
72.
Warner, R., Steel, B., & Lovrich, L. (1989). Conditions associated with the advent of representative bureaucracy: The case of policing. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 562-578.
73.
Weeden, K. A. (1998). Revisiting occupational sex segregation in the United States, 1910-1990: Results from a log-linear approach. Demography, 35(4), 475-487.
74.
Weldon, S. L. (2002). Beyond bodies: Institutional sources of representation for women in democratic policy making. Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1153-1174.
75.
Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. Boston: Little, Brown.
76.
Willoughby, K. G. (1991). Gender-basedwage gap: The case of the state government budget analyst. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 12(1), 33-47.
77.
Wright, D. S., Yoo, J.-W., & Cohen, J. (1991). The evolving profile of state administrators. Journal of State Government, 64, 30-38.
