A Regional Analysis of the Impacts of Changes in Housing Values on Property Tax Assessment During and After the 2008 Financial Crisis

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between changing house prices and assessed value in the Detroit Michigan region. Using parcel-level data from 2008 through 2016, we construct a Hedonic Housing Price Index and an Assessed Value Index for 120 Michigan assessing jurisdictions in the five-county region surrounding Detroit (Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, Washtenaw, and Wayne). Our findings are consistent with the literature, indicating at least a three-year lag between changes in house prices and changes in property assessments. Communities considered to be distressed tended to over-assess properties before the crisis, but these communities recalibrated assessments to better align with market conditions after the financial crisis. Our evaluation also shows that while assessed values decreased more slowly than housing prices fell during the crisis, assessed values tended to fall to even deeper levels than housing prices over a longer time horizon.

JEL Codes: H71, H83, G01

Keywords

housing price property value assessment financial crisis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bell

1984. “Administrative Inequity and Property Assessment: The Case for the Traditional Approach.” Property Tax Journal 3 (2): 123–31.

Cheng

P. L.

, (1974). Property taxation, assessment performance, and its measurement. Public Finance= Finances publiques, 29(3-4), 268–284.

Chernick

Langley

Reschovsky

2011. “The Impact of the Great Recession and the Housing Crisis on the Financing of America’s Largest Cities.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 41 (4): 372–81.

Chow

, (2011). Hedonic price index: an illustration with residential property prices. Government Document.

Citizens Research Council of Michigan. 2022. “Growing City Tax Rates Approach Rate Limits.” https://crcmich.org/growing-city-tax-rates-approach-rate-limits (accessed March 23, 2023).

Clapp

1990. “A New Test for Equitable Real Estate Tax Assessment.” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 3 (3): 233–49.

de Haan

. 2004. “Hedonic Regression: The Time Dummy Index as a Special Case of the Imputation Törnqvist Index.” Paper Presented at the 8th Ottawa Group Meeting, Helsinki.

Deng

2021. “An Analysis of Public vs. Private Contracting Performance in Michigan Property Tax Assessment.” Unpublished manuscript.

Goodman

2018. “House Prices and Property Tax Revenues During the Boom and Bust: Evidence from Small-Area Estimates.” Growth and Change 49 (4): 1–21.

10.

Hill

R. J.

Trojanek

2022. “An Evaluation of Competing Methods for Constructing House Price Indexes: The Case of Warsaw.” Land Use Policy 120:106226. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106226.

11.

Hodge

T. R.

2021. “Decreasing Delinquency Through Assessment Reductions: Evidence from Detroit.” Journal of Urban Affairs 43 (5): 685–701.

12.

Hodge

T. R.

McMillen

D. P.

Sands

Skidmore

2017. “Assessment Inequity in a Declining Housing Market: The Case of Detroit.” Real Estate Economics 45 (2): 237–58.

13.

Lutz

B. F.

2008. “The Connection Between House Price Appreciation and Property Tax Revenues.” National Tax Journal 61 (3): 555–72.

14.

Mikesell

J. L.

Liu

2013. “Property Tax Stability: A Tax System Model of Base and Revenue Dynamics Through the Great Recession and Beyond.” Public Finance & Management 13 (4): 310–34.

15.

New York Times Editorial Board. 2021. “How Lower-Income Americans Get Cheated on Property Taxes”. The New York Times, April 3, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/03/opinion/sunday/property-taxes-housing-assessment-inequality.html.

16.

Paglin

Fogarty

1972. “Equity and the Property Tax: A New Conceptual Focus.” National Tax Journal 25 (4): 557–65.

17.

Skidmore

Reese

Kang

S. H.

2012. “Regional Analysis of Property Taxation, Education Finance Reform, and Property Value Growth.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 42 (1–2): 351–63.

18.

State Tax Commission. 2018. “Guide to Basic Assessing.” https://www.michigan.gov/treasury/-/media/Project/Websites/treasury/Assessors/Guide_to_Basic_Assessing_116.pdf?rev=91a77c77c4f944e68e5afa46166445ab&hash=8219AD9669343C6BAFC2D87E8528861D

19.

Sunderman

Birch

Cannaday

Hamilton

1990. “Testing for Vertical Inequity in Property Tax Systems.” Journal of Real Estate Research 5 (3): 319–34.

20.

The International Association of Assessing Officers (IAAO). 1990. Property Appraisal and Assessment Administration, Chicago, Illinois.