This article offers an analysis of the shortcomings the field of public administration in lending its expertise to financial services regulatory matters. It argues that public administration’s main contributions to debates of regulatory policy are; ethical normative perspective and practitioner expertise.
FerranE. (2003). Examining the UK’s experience in adopting the single financial regulator model. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 28, 258-307.
10.
FreemanK. D. (2009). Analysis of twenty-first century risks in light of the recent market collapse. Washington, DC: Department of Defense Irregular Warfare Support Program.
11.
GoodsellC. (Ed.). (1990). Public administration and the public interest. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
12.
GreenR. T. (2012). Plutocracy, bureaucracy, and the end of public trust. Administration & Society, 44, 109-143.
13.
GreiderW. (1987). Secrets of the temple: How the federal reserve runs the country. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
14.
HammondB. (1957). Banks and politics in America: From the revolution to the civil war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
HammondB. (1970). Sovereignty and an empty purse. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
HausmanD. M.McPhersonM. S. (2006). Economic analysis, moral philosophy, and public policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
17.
HoffmannS. (2001). Politics and banking, Ideas, Public Policy, and the Creation of Financial Institutions (1st ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
HoffmannS. M.CassellM. K. (2010). Mission expansion in the Federal Home Loan Bank System. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
19.
HoffmannS. M.CassellM. K. (2010). Mission expansion in the Federal Home Loan Bank System. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
KettlD. F. (1991). The savings-and-loan bailout: The mismatch between the headlines and the issues. PS: Political Science & Politics, 24, 441-447.
22.
KhademianA. M. (1996). Checking on banks: Autonomy and accountability in three federal agencies (1st ed.). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
23.
KhademianA. M. (2009). Bankruptcies, bailouts and the banking bureaucracy: The bush agenda and the capacity for crisis. The Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics. Article 5.
24.
LongN. E. (1991). Politics, political science and the public interest. PS: Political Science & Politics, 24, 670-675.
25.
MeierK. J. (1985). Regulation: Politics, bureaucracy and economics. New York, NY: St. Martin’s.
26.
OlejarskiA. M. (2011). Public good as public interest? The principle of tangibility in eminent domain legislation. Public Integrity, 13, 41-58.
27.
RadinB. A. (2000). Beyond Machiavelli: Policy analysis comes of age. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
28.
RohrJ. A. (1998). Public service, ethics, and constitutional practice. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
29.
ScottK. E. (1977). A model of competition in regulation. Stanford Law Review, 30(1), 1-50.
30.
States, T.N.C. o. t. C. o. t. F. a. E.C. i. t. U. (2011). The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report. New York, NY.
