Conventional benchmarking methods that rely on pre-existing measures may not be best suited for many of the challenges confronting local service delivery. This paper introduces an issue-based benchmarking method and describes the six-stage cycle implemented by a benchmarking collaborative in the Chicagoland region. Each stage of the process is discussed to highlight the approaches and tools used to identify the most salient issues and relevant performance measures. In the final section, we reflect on the changes we made to the process and overall lessons learned that we believe will help others attempting to engage in similar benchmarking efforts.
AmmonsD. N.1999. “A Proper Mentality for Benchmarking.” Public Administration Review59 (2): 105–9. DOI:10.2307/977630.
2.
AmmonsDavid. 2014. Municipal Benchmarks: Assessing Local Performance and Establishing Community Standards: Assessing Local Performance and Establishing Community Standards. New York: Routledge.
3.
AmmonsDavid N.CoeCharlesLombardoMichael. 2001. “Performance-Comparison Projects in Local Government: Participants’ Perspectives.” Public Administration Review61 (1): 100–10. DOI: 10.1111/0033-3352.00009.
4.
AnandGurumurthyKodaliRambabu. 2008. “Benchmarking the Benchmarking Models.” Benchmarking: An International journal15 (3): 257–91. DOI: 10.1108/14635770810876593.
BowermanMaryBallAmandaFrancisGraham. 2001. “Benchmarking as a Tool for the Modernisation of Local Government.” Financial Accountability & Management17 (4): 321–9. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0408.00136.
7.
BowermanMaryFrancisGrahamBallAmandaFryJackie. 2002. “The Evolution of Benchmarking in UK Local Authorities.” Benchmarking: An International Journal9 (5): 429–49. DOI: 10.1108/14635770210451455.
8.
BundtJulieLutzGene M.. 1999. “Connecting State Government Reform with Public Priorities: The Iowa Test Case.” State and Local Government Review31 (2): 78–90. DOI: 10.1177/0160323X9903100201.
9.
CampRobert C. 1989. Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices That Lead to Superior Performance. Milwaukee, WI: Quality Press.
10.
City Council Agenda. April 2019. Council Meeting Records, City of Lake Forest, Illinois. https://www.cityoflakeforest.com/Document_center/Agendas percent20and percent20Minutes/City percent20Council/2019/Agendas/CC_2019_04_01.pdf.
11.
CopleyPaul A.GaverJennifer J.GaverKenneth M.. 1995. “Simultaneous Estimation of the Supply and Demand of Differentiated Audits: Evidence from the Municipal Audit Market.” Journal of Accounting Research33 (1): 137–55. DOI: 10.2307/2491296.
12.
CoxAndrewThompsonIan. 1998. “On the Appropriateness of Benchmarking.” Journal of General Management23 (3): 1–20.
13.
FolzDavid H. 2004. “Service Quality and Benchmarking the Performance of Municipal Services.” Public Administration Review64 (2): 209–20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00362.x.
14.
FrancisGrahamHollowayJacky. 2007. “What Have we Learned? Themes from the Literature on Best-Practice Benchmarking.” International Journal of Management Reviews9 (3): 171–89. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00204.x.
15.
GoldsmithAndrew. 2005. “Police Reform and the Problem of Trust.” Theoretical Criminology9 (4): 443–70. DOI: 10.1177/1362480605057727.
16.
HintonMatthewFrancisGrahamHollowayJacky. 2000. “Best Practice Benchmarking in the UK.” Benchmarking: An International Journal7 (1): 52–61. DOI: 10.1108/14635770010314954.
17.
KeehleyPatriciaAbercrombieNeil. 2008. Benchmarking in the Public and Nonprofit Sectors: Best Practices for Achieving Performance Breakthroughs. 2nd Edition, 85–99. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
18.
KnutssonHansRambergUlfTagessonTorbjörn. 2012. “Benchmarking Impact Through Municipal Benchmarking Networks: Improvement or Leveling of Performance?” Public Performance & Management Review36 (1): 102–23. DOI: 10.2753/PMR1530-9576360105.
19.
KochelTammy RinehartSkoganWesley G.. 2021. “Accountability and Transparency as Levers to Promote Public Trust and Police Legitimacy: Findings from a Natural Experiment.” Policing: An International Journal44 (6): 1046–59. DOI: 10.1108/PIJPSM-04-2021-0062.
20.
LinosElizabethReinhardJoanneRudaSimon. 2017. “Levelling the Playing Field in Police Recruitment: Evidence from a Field Experiment on Test Performance.” Public Administration95 (4): 943–56. DOI: 10.1111/padm.12344.
21.
LiouKuotsai Tom. 2019. “Technology Application and Police Management: Issues and Challenges.” International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior22 (2): 191–208. DOI: 10.1108/IJOTB-07-2018-0084.
22.
NorthcottDerylLlewellynSue. 2005. “Benchmarking in UK Health: A Gap Between Policy and Practice?” Benchmarking: An International Journal12 (5): 419–35. DOI: 10.1108/14635770510619357.
23.
PeytonKyleSierra-ArévaloMichaelRandDavid G.. 2019. “A Field Experiment on Community Policing and Police Legitimacy.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116 (40): 19894–8. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1910157116.
24.
RogersColinScallyEmily Jayne. 2018. “Police use of Technology: Insights from the Literature.” International Journal of Emergency Services7 (2): 100–10. DOI: 10.1108/IJES-03-2017-0012.
25.
SiverboSvenJohanssonTobias. 2006. “Relative Performance Evaluation in Swedish Local Government.” Financial Accountability & Management22 (3): 271–90. DOI: 10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00403.x.
WilsonJeremy M. 2012. “Articulating the Dynamic Police Staffing Challenge: An Examination of Supply and Demand.” Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management35 (2): 327–55. DOI: 10.1108/13639511211230084.
28.
WrightJames E.HeadleyAndrea M.. 2020. “Police use of Force Interactions: Is Race Relevant or Gender Germane?” The American Review of Public Administration50 (8): 851–64. DOI: 10.1177/0275074020919908.
