Since the New Public Management Movement, privatization has become a popular approach for delivering public services. However, few studies empirically assess the relationship between privatization of public service delivery and citizen participation in coproduction. Taking advantage of a national survey of U.S. local government chief administrators, this study aims to contribute to the literature by exploring the link between these two important mechanisms of public service provision. Our findings indicate that local governments are more likely to involve citizens in coproduction when a larger proportion of service delivery is privatized. Regarding various types of coproduction, privatization in public service delivery is positively associated with the likelihood of citizen involvement in co-planning, co-design, and co-assessment, but not in co-delivery. Finally, compared to for-profit service providers, involving nonprofit organizations in public service delivery is likely to create more opportunities for citizens to be involved in the coproduction of public services.
AlfordJ. (2009). Engaging public sector clients: From service-delivery to co-production. Palgrave.
2.
AmirkhanyanA. A. (2008). Privatizing public nursing homes: Examining the effects on quality and access. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 665–680.
3.
AmirkhanyanA. A.LambrightK. T. (2017). Citizen participation in the age of contracting: When service delivery trumps democracy. Routledge.
4.
AndréR. (2010). Assessing the accountability of government-sponsored enterprises and quangos. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0509-y
5.
AndrewsR.EntwistleT. (2010). Does cross-sectoral partnership deliver? An empirical exploration of public service effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(3), 679–701. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup045
BeermanJ. M. (2001). Privatization and political accountability. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 28(5), 1507–1557. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol28/iss5/2
8.
BelG.FagedaX.WarnerM. E. (2010). Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? A meta-regression analysis of solid waste and water services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(3), 553–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20509
9.
BelG.HebdonR.WarnerM. (2018). Beyond privatization and cost savings: Alternatives for local government reform. Local Government Studies, 44(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1428190
10.
BenjaminL. M.BrudneyJ. L. (2018). What do voluntary sector studies offer research on co-production? In BrandsenT.VerschuereB.SteenT. (Eds.), In co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public services (pp. 49–60). Routledge.
BinghamL. B.NabatchiT.O'LearyR. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00482.x
13.
BovairdT. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
14.
BovairdT.Van RyzinG. G.LoefflerE.ParradoS. (2015). Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public services. Journal of Social Policy, 44(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279414000567
15.
BrownT.PotoskiM. (2006). Contracting for management: Assessing management capacity under alternative service delivery arrangements. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 25(2), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20175
16.
BrownT. L.PotoskiM.Van SlykeD. M. (2006). Managing public service contracts: Aligning values, institutions, and markets. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00590.x
17.
BrudneyJ. L. (1987). Coproduction and privatization: Exploring the relationship and its implications. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16(3), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976408701600303
BrudneyJ. L.ChengY.MeijsL. (2022). Defining and measuring coproduction: Deriving lessons from practicing local government managers. Public Administration Review, 82(5), 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13476
20.
BrudneyJ. L.EnglandR. E. (1983). Toward a definition of the coproduction concept. Public Administration Review, 43(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/975300
21.
BrysonJ. M.CrosbyB. C.BloombergL. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456.
22.
ChengY. (2019). Exploring the role of nonprofits in public service provision: Moving from coproduction to cogovernance. Public Administration Review, 79(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12970
23.
ChengY. (Daniel). (2020). Bridging the great divide: toward a comparative understanding of coproduction. Online first at Journal of Chinese Governance.
DenhardtR. B.DenhardtJ. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117
26.
EikenberryA. M.KluverJ. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk?Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x
GazleyB.BrudneyJ. L. (2007). The purpose (and perils) of government-nonprofit partnership. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(3), 389–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764006295997
29.
GazleyB.ChengY. (2019). Integrating coproduction theory into voluntary sector theories: approaches and implications for Chinese governance. Online first at Journal of Chinese Governance.
30.
GazleyB.LaFontantC.ChengY. D. (2020). Does coproduction of public services support government's social equity goals? The case of US state parks.Public Administration Review, 80(3), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13161
31.
GirthA. M.HefetzA.JohnstonJ. M.WarnerM. E. (2012). Outsourcing public service delivery: Management responses in noncompetitive markets. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 887–900.
32.
HefetzA.WarnerM. (2004). Privatization and its reverse: Explaining the dynamics of the government contracting process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh012
33.
HerranzJ.Jr. (2007). The multisectoral trilemma of network management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum004
34.
JingY.ChenB. (2012). Is competitive contracting really competitive? Exploring government–nonprofit collaboration in China. International Public Management Journal, 15(4), 405–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2012.761054
35.
KimY. (2018). Can alternative service delivery save cities after the great recession? Barriers to privatization and cooperation. Local Government Studies, 44(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1395740
36.
LamotheM.LamotheS.BellE. (2018). Understanding local service delivery arrangements: Are the ICMA ASD data reliable?Public Administration Review, 78(4), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12939
37.
LerouxK. (2007). Nonprofits as civic intermediaries: The role of community-based organizations in promoting political participation. Urban Affairs Review, 42(3), 410–422.
38.
LeRouxK. (2009). Paternalistic or participatory governance? Examining opportunities for client participation in nonprofit social service organizations. Public Administration Review, 69(3), 504–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01996.x
39.
LevinL. (2022). Contracting out Public Participation to External Consultants: Observations on Epistemic Justice. Online first at Public Administration Review.
40.
MazzeiM.TeasdaleS.CalòF.RoyM. J. (2020). Co-production and the third sector: Conceptualising different approaches to service user involvement. Public Management Review, 22(9), 1265–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1630135
41.
McMullinC. (2021). Challenging the necessity of new public governance: Co-production by third sector organizations under different models of public management. Public Administration, 99(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12672
42.
MorganD. R.EnglandR. E. (1988). The two faces of privatization. Public Administration Review, 48(6), 979–987. https://doi.org/10.2307/976994
43.
MulganR. (2000). Comparing accountability in the public and private sectors. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.00142
NabatchiT.SancinoA.SiciliaM. (2017). Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when, and what of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12765
46.
NesbitR.BrudneyJ. L. (2013). Volunteer use in local government service delivery. The Municipal Year Book 2013. Washington, D.C. International City County Management Association (pp. 79–88).
47.
OsborneD. E.GaeblerT. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming government. Addison-Wesley.
OsborneS. P.RadnorZ.StrokoschK. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment?Public Management Review, 18(5), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927
OstromV.OstromE. (1971). Public choice: A different approach to the study of public administration. Public Administration Review, 31(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.2307/974676
52.
ParksR. B.BakerP. C.KiserL.OakersonR.OstromE.OstromV.PercyS. L.VandivortM. B.WhitakerG. P.WilsonR. (1981). Consumers as coproducers of public services: Some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9(7), 1001–1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x
53.
PestoffV. (2018). Co-production at the crossroads of public administration regimes. In BrandsenT.VerschuereB.SteenT. (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public services (pp. 27–36). Routledge.
54.
SalamonL. M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16(1–2), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976408701600104
55.
SkocpolT. (2003). Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. University of Oklahoma Press.
56.
SorrentinoM.SiciliaM.HowlettM. (2018). Understanding co-production as a new public governance tool. Policy and Society, 37(3), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1521676
57.
ThomasJ. C. (2013). Citizen, customer, partner: Rethinking the place of the public in public management. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 786–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12109
58.
WarnerM.HebdonR. (2001). Local government restructuring: Privatization and its alternatives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(2), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.2027
59.
WitesmanE. M.FernandezS. (2013). Government contracts with private organizations: Are there differences between nonprofits and for-profits?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(4), 689–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012442592
