Executive scholars suggest that unilateral action is used for two reasons: to circumvent a hostile legislature and in response to delegation from the legislature as a means of expediting action. Extant research on unilateral action focuses on one governmental setting, limiting our understanding of how chief executives with different degrees of formal power use unilateral action and about how legislatures of varying capacity respond. We examine the use of executive orders in a cross-sectional context (the U.S. states), thus providing a more comprehensive perspective of where unilateral action fits in relation to other executive powers and why it is used.
BarrilleauxCharlesBerkmanMichael. 2003. Do governors matter? Budgeting rules and the politics of state policymaking. Political Research Quarterly56:409–17.
2.
CameronA. ColinTrivediPravin K.. 2013. Regression Analysis of Count Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
CareyJohnShugartMatthew. 1998. Calling out the tanks or filling out the forms? In Executive Decree Authority, edited by CareyJohnShugartMatthew, 1–32. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
4.
CooperPhillip. 2002. By Order of the President: The Use and Abuse of Direct Presidential Action. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
5.
CorleyPamela C.2006. Avoiding advice and consent: Recess appointments and presidential power. Presidential Studies Quarterly36:670–80.
6.
CoxGary W.MorgensternScott. 2002. Epilogue: Latin America’s reactive assemblies and proactive presidents. In Legislative Politics in Latin America, edited by MorgensternScottNacifBenito, 446–68. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
CrewRobert E.JrCockerhamAlexandraJamesEdwardIII. Forthcoming. A Blue Dot in a Field of Red: Gwen Graham Wins Florida’s Second Congressional District. In Races, Reforms and Policy: Implications of the 2014 Midterm Elections, edited by ChristopherGaldieriLucasJenniferSiscoTauna. University of Akron Press.
8.
CrewRobert E.JrHillMarjorie Renee. 1995. Gubernatorial influence in state government policymaking. The Journal of State Government68:29–35.
9.
CrispBrian F.1998. Presidential decree authority in Venezuela. In Executive Decree Authority, edited by CareyJohn M.ShugartMatthew S.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
DickinsonMatthew J.GubbJesse. 2016. The limits to power without persuasion. Presidential Studies Quarterly46:48–72.
11.
FergusonMargaret. 2003. Chief executive success in the legislative arena. State Politics and Policy Quarterly3:158–82.
12.
FergusonMargaretBowlingCynthia. 2008. Executive orders and administrative control. Public Administration Review68:S20–28.
GenoveseMichael. 2011. Presidential Prerogative: Imperial Power in an Age of Terrorism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
HammKeithMoncriefGary. 2013. Legislative politics in the states. In Politics in the American States, 10th ed., edited by GrayVirginiaHansonRussellKousserThad.Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
16.
HowellWilliam. 2003. Power without Persuasion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
HuberJohn D.1998. Presidential decree authority in France. In Executive Decree Authority, edited by CareyJohn M.ShugartMatthew S.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
ImaiKosukeKingGaryLauOlivia. 2015. Negbinom: Negative binomial regression for event count dependent variables. In Zelig: Everyone’s Statistical Software, edited by ImaiKosukeKingGaryLauOlivia. http://gking.harvard.edu/zelig (accessed September 15, 2015).
19.
KousserThadPhillipsJustin. 2012. The Power of American Governors. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
LightPaul C.1991. The President’s Agenda, Rev. ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
21.
ScottMainwaringShugartMatthew Soberg, Eds. 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
22.
MayerKenneth. 1999. Executive orders and presidential power. Journal of Politics61:445–66.
23.
MayerKenneth. 2002. With the Stroke of A Pen. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
MayerKenneth R.2009. Going alone the presidential power of unilateral action. In The Oxford Handbook of the American Presidency, edited by EdwardsGeorgeHowellWilliam. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
MoeTerry M.HowellWilliam G.. 1999. Unilateral action and presidential power: A theory. Presidential Studies Quarterly29:850–73.
26.
MorehouseSarahJewellMalcolm. 2004. States as laboratories: A reprise. Annual Review of Political Science7:177–203.
27.
NeustadtRichard. 1960. Presidential Power. New York: Wiley.
28.
ParrishJohn D.1998. Presidential decree authority in Russia 1991-95. In Executive Decree Authority, edited by CareyJohn M.ShugartMatthew S.. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
29.
PereiraCarlosPowerTimothy J.RennóLucio. 2005. Under what conditions do presidents resort to decree power? Theory and evidence from the Brazilian case. Journal of Politics67:178–200.
30.
PereiraCarlosPowerTimothy J.RennóLucio R.2008. Agenda power, executive decree authority, and the mixed results of reform in the Brazilian congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly33:5–33.
31.
PowerTimothy J.1998. The pen is mightier than the congress: Presidential decree authority in Brazil. In Executive Decree Authority, edited by CareyJohn M.ShugartMatthew S., 197–233. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
32.
RagsdaleLynn. 2009. Vital Statistics on the Presidency, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
33.
ReichGary. 2002. Executive decree authority in Brazil: How reactive legislators influence policy. Legislative Studies Quarterly27:5–31.
34.
RubioDelia F.GorettiMatteo. 1998. When the president governs alone: The decretazo in Argentina, 1989-93. In Executive Decree Authority, edited by CareyJohn M.ShugartMatthew S.. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
35.
RudalevigeAndrew. 2012. The contemporary presidency: Executive orders and presidential unilateralism. Presidential Studies Quarterly42:138–60.
36.
SalaVincent D.KreppelAmie. 1998. Dancing without a lead: Presidential decrees in Italy. In Executive Decree Authority, edited CareyJohn M.ShugartMatthew S.Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
37.
SchmidtGregory. 1998. Presidential usurpation or congressional preference? The evolution of executive decree authority in Peru. In Executive Decree Authority, edited by CareyJohn M.ShugartMatthew S., 104–41. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
38.
VoldenCraig. 2002. A formal model of the politics of delegation in a separation of powers system. American Journal of Political Science46:111–33.
39.
WarberAdam L.2006. Executive Orders and the Modern Presidency: Legislating from the Oval Office. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
