Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Studies of state budgeting focus on gubernatorial power primarily by examining executive influence over appropriations to individual agencies or programs. They also view executive versus legislative budgeting as a short-term zero-sum game. An alternative approach is to look at budgeting from a long-term perspective centered on “big-picture” elements of a state’s financial position. This case study takes this perspective by looking at Delaware Governor Pete du Pont’s tenure (1977-1985) when he engineered a remarkable, long-term financial turnaround in the face of economic stagnation, undisciplined spending, historically weak financial management, and divided government. His leadership resulted in balanced budgets, repeated tax cuts, upgraded bond ratings, and reduced unemployment. The case illustrates how governors can impact “big-picture” issues with influence extending well beyond their tenure in office. An examination of du Pont’s leadership style suggests strong similarities to leaders studied by Jim Collins who have transformed other organizations. Looking at the effectiveness of du Pont’s leadership style suggests that clear priorities, bipartisan solutions, and altering the institutional framework for tax and spending decisions can contribute positively to influence over “big-picture” issues of state finance.

Keywords

governors state budgets leadership

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abney

Lauth

T. P.

(1987). Perceptions of the impact of governors and legislators in the state appropriations process. Western Political Quarterly, 40, 335-342.

Abney

Lauth

T. P.

(1998). The end of legislative dominance in state appropriations. Public Administration Review, 58, 388-394.

Alt

J. E.

Lassen

D. D.

Skilling

(2002). Fiscal transparency, gubernatorial approval, and the scale of government: Evidence from the states. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 2, 230-250.

Alt

J. E.

Lowry

R. C.

(1994). Divided government, fiscal institutions, and budget deficits: Evidence from the states. American Political Science Review, 88, 811-828.

Alt

J. E.

Lowry

R. C.

(2000). A dynamic model of state budget outcomes under divided partisan government. Journal of Politics, 62, 1035-1069.

Anton

T. J.

(1966). The politics of state expenditures in Illinois. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Baker v. Carr, 369 U. S. 186 (1962).

Berlin

(1993). The hedgehog and the fox. Chicago, IL: Elephant Paperbacks.

Beyle

Ferguson

(2008). Governors and the executive branch. In Gray

Hanson

R. L.

(Eds.), Politics in the American states: A comparative analysis (pp. 192-228). Washington, DC: CQ Press.

10.

Boyer

W. W.

Ratledge

E. C.

(2009). Delaware politics and government. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

11.

Clarke

(1998). Divided government and budget conflict in the US states. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 23, 5-22.

12.

Collins

(2001). Good to great. New York, NY: Harper Business.

13.

Collins

(2005). Good to great and the social sectors. Boulder, CO: Author.

14.

Dometrius

N. C.

Wright

D. S.

(2010). Governors, legislatures, and state budgets across time. Political Research Quarterly, 63, 783-795.

15.

Ferguson

M. R.

(2003). Chief executives success in the legislative arena. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 3, 158-192.

16.

Fitch Ratings. (2010). Fitch rates Delaware’s 124MM GOBonds “AAA:” Outlook stable. New York, NY: Author.

17.

Gerth

(1981, March 17). New York Banks Urged Delaware to Lure Bankers. The New York Times, p. 1.

18.

Goodman

(2007). Determinants of perceived gubernatorial influence among state executive budget analysts and legislative fiscal analysts. Political Research Quarterly, 60, 43-54.

19.

Hale

G. E.

(1977). Executive leadership versus budgetary behavior. Administration & Society, 9, 169-190.

20.

Holbrook

T. M.

La Raja

R. J.

(2008). Parties and elections. In Gray

Hanson

R. L.

(Eds.), Politics in the American states: A comparative analysis (9th ed., pp. 61-97). Washington, DC: CQ Press.

21.

Howard

S. K.

(1973). Changing state budgeting. Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments.

22.

Laffer

A. B.

(2004). The Laffer curve: Past, present and future. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.

23.

Moody’s Investors Service. (2010). Moody’s assigns Aaa rating to Delaware’s $175 million general obligation bonds. New York, NY: Author.

24.

Nagengast

(2007). Pierre S. du Pont IV: Governor of Delaware 1977-1985. Dover: Delaware Heritage Press.

25.

Nicholson-Crotty

Meier

K. J.

(2002). Size doesn’t matter: In defense of single-state studies. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 2, 411-422.

26.

Peirce

N. R.

Barone

(1977). The Mid-Atlantic states of America: People, politics and power in five Mid-Atlantic States. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

27.

Rosenthal

(2013). The best job in politics: Exploring how governors succeed as policy leaders. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

28.

Schick

(1971). Budget innovation in the states. Washington, DC: Brookings.

29.

Sharkansky

(1968). Agency requests, gubernatorial support and budget success in states legislatures. American Political Science Review, 62, 1220-1231.

30.

Standard & Poor’s. (2010). Delaware; general obligation. Retrieved from http://finance.delaware.gov/publications/Bonds/sp_10.pdf

31.

Thompson

J. A.

(1987). Agency requests, gubernatorial support, and budget success in state legislatures revisited. Journal of Politics, 49, 756-779.

State Budgets,Governors,and Their Influence on “Big-Picture Issues”

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References