The relationship between approval of the state legislature and political polarization in the legislature is investigated by matching responses from a large national survey to Shor and McCarty’s ideological scores for state parties. In contrast to popular wisdom, citizens do not have a negative view of more polarized legislatures or more extreme majority parties, all else constant. Instead, legislative approval is filtered primarily through a partisan lens; partisans are more approving when their party is in control and more extreme (and less approving when the opposing party is in control and more extreme).
AbramowitzAlan I.SaundersKyle L.. 2008. Is polarization a myth?Journal of Politics70:542–55.
2.
AdamsGreg D.1996. Legislative effects of single-member vs. multi-member districts. American Journal of Political Science40:129–44.
3.
BaldassarriDeliaGelmanAndrew. 2008. Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion. American Journal of Sociology114:408–46.
4.
BarberMichael J.McCartyNolan. 2013. Causes and consequences of polarization. In Negotiating agreement in politics, ed. MansbridgeJaneMartinCathie Jo, 19–53. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
BinderSarah. 2014. Polarized we govern?Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
7.
ConversePhilip E.1964. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Ideology and discontent, ed. ApterDavid E., 206–61. New York: Free Press.
8.
DelliCarpiniMichaelX.KeeterScott. 1996. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
FiorinaMorris P.AbramsSamuel J.. 2008. Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science11:563–88.
10.
Fiorina MorrisP.AbramsSamuel J.PopeJeremy C.. 2005. Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York: Longman.
11.
FowlerLinda L.1982. How interest groups select issues for rating voting records of members of the U.S. Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly7:401–13.
12.
GrosecloseTimLevittSteven D.SnyderJames M.Jr. 1999. Comparing interest group scores across time and chambers: Adjusted ADA scores for the U.S. Congress. American Political Science Review93:33–50.
13.
Hall JamiesonKathleenFalkErika. 2000. Continuity and change in civility in the house. In Polarized politics: Congress and the president in a partisan era, ed. BondJ. R.FleisherR., 96–108. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
14.
HetheringtonMarc J.RudolphThomas J.. 2015. Why Washington won’t work: Polarization, political trust, and the governing crisis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
HinchliffeKelsey L.LeeFrances E.. 2016. Party competition and conflict in state legislatures. State Politics and Policy Quarterly16:172–97.
16.
IyengarShantoWestwoodSean J.. 2015. Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on growing polarization. American Journal of Political Science59:690–707.
17.
KelleherChristine A.WolakJennifer. 2007. Explaining public confidence in the branches of state government. Political Research Quarterly60:707–721.
18.
LaymanGeoffrey C.CarseyThomas M.HorowitzJuliana Menasce. 2006. Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Politics9:83–110.
19.
LodgeMiltonTaberCharles. 2013. The rationalizing voter. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
MannThomasOrnsteinNorman. 2012. It’s even worse than it looks: How the American constitutional system collided with the new politics of extremism. New York: Basic Books.
21.
McCartyNolan. 2007. The policy effects of political polarization. In The transformation of the American Politics, ed. PiersonPaulSkocpolTheda, 223–255. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
McCartyNolanPooleKeithRosenthalHoward. 2006. Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
McCartyNolanRoddenJonathanShorBorisTausanovitchChrisWarshawkChristopher. 2015. Geography, uncertainty, and polarization. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2477157(accessed August 27, 2015).
24.
OverbyL. MarvinKazeeThomas A.. 2000. Outlying committees in the statehouse: An examination of the prevalence of committee outliers in state legislatures. Journal of Politics62:701–28.
25.
PersilyNathaniel. 2015. Solutions to political polarization in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
PooleKeithRosenthalHoward. 2001. D-NOMINATE after 10 years: An update to Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. Legislative Studies Quarterly26:5–29.
27.
PopkinSamuel I.1991. The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
PrimoDavidJacobsmeierMatthewMilyoJeffrey. 2006. Estimating the impact of state policies and institutions with mixed-level data. State Politics & Policy Quarterly7:446–59.
29.
PriorMarkus. 2013. Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Politics16:101–27.
30.
RichardsonLilliard E.KoniskyDavid M.MilyoJeffrey. 2012. Public approval of state legislatures. State Politics and Policy Quarterly37:99–116.
31.
RogowskiJon. 2014. Electoral choice, ideological conflict, and political participation. American Journal of Political Science58:479–94.
ShorBorisMcCartyNolan. 2011. The ideological mapping of American legislatures. American Political Science Review105:530–51.
35.
SnyderJames M.Jr. 1992. Artificial extremism in interest group ratings. Legislative Studies Quarterly17:319–45.
36.
SquirePeverill. 1993. Professionalization and public opinion of state legislatures. Journal of Politics55:479–91.
37.
SquirePeverill. 2012. The evolution of American legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
38.
TaberCharles S.LodgeMilton. 2006. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science50:755–69.
39.
UslanerEric. 2015. Congressional polarization and political trust. The Forum13:361–73.
40.
VanderMolenKathrynMilyoJeffrey. 2016. Public confidence in the redistricting process: The role of independent commissions, state legislative polarization, and partisan preferences. State and Local Government Review48:1–10.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
