Immigration policy remains a hotly debated issue nationally in the United States, but the interaction of legislative gridlock on comprehensive reform and the actions of policy entrepreneurs push policy innovation into the arena of state and local governments. This article examines the intersection of immigration and local policy making, examining basic patterns of local responsiveness and apparent factors driving the response. Using the insights of existing research, including Rubaii-Barrett and Brenner, this article highlights political incorporation (e.g., Ramakrishnan and Gulasekaram) and bureaucratic incorporation (e.g., Marrow) as competing explanations in the literature. As an exploratory effort to evaluate the relative claims, this article reports the results of a document analysis of the local government Web sites for seventeen localities in the Richmond, VA, Metropolitan Statistical Area looking first at how localities are responding, second at indications of why and finally assessing whether initiative for responses occurs more at a bureaucratic or elected official level.
BenavidesAbraham David. 2008. Municipal best practices: How local governments are responding to a growing Hispanic community. Journal of Public Management and Social Policy14:59–78.
2.
BogdanRobert C.BiklenSari Knopp. 1998. Qualitative research in education. An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: ERIC.
3.
BrennerChristine Thurlow. 2009b. Structures and strategies for immigrant integration: Evidence from local governments in the new Latino destinations in the United States. Journal of Public Management and Social Policy15:31–70.
4.
BrettellCaroline B.NibbsFaith G.. 2011. Immigrant suburban settlement and the “threat” to middle class status and identity: The case of Farmers Branch, Texas. International Migration49:1–30.
HolstiOle R.1969. Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7.
HopkinsDaniel J.2010. Politicized places: Explaining where and when immigrants provoke local opposition. The American Political Science Review104:40–60. doi: 10.2307/27798539.
8.
HuangZhenyu. 2007. A comprehensive analysis of US counties’ e-government portals: Development status and functionalities. European Journal of Information Systems16:149–64.
9.
Jones-CorreaMichael. 2008. Race to the top? The politics of immigrant education in suburbia. In New faces in new places: The changing geography of American immigration, ed. MasseyD. S., 308–40. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
LightIvan. 2006. Deflecting immigration: Networks, markets, and regulation in Los Angeles. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
12.
LipskyMichael. 2010. Street-level Bureaucracy, 30th Ann. Ed.: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
13.
MarrowHelen. 2009. Immigrant bureaucratic incorporation: The dual roles of professional missions and government policies. American Sociological Review74:756–76.
14.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.Nicholson-CrottySean. 2004. Multilevel governance and organizational performance: Investigating the political-bureaucratic labyrinth. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management23:31.
15.
MeierK. J.StewartJosephEnglandRobert E.1991. The politics of bureaucratic discretion: Educational access as an urban service. American Journal of Political Science35:155–77.
16.
MitnikPabloHalpern-FinnertyJessica. 2010. Immigration and local governments: Inclusionary local policies in the era of state rescaling. In Taking local control: Immigration policy activism in the U.S. cities and states, ed. VarsanyiMonica, 51–72. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
RamakrishnanS. K.GulasekaramP.. 2013. The importance of the political in immigration federalism. Arizona State Law Journal44:4–13.
18.
RamakrishnanS. K.LewisP. G.. 2005. Immigrants and local governance: The view from city hall. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
19.
RamakrishnanS. K.WongTom. 2010Partisanship, not Spanish: Explaining municipal ordinances affecting undocumented immigrants. In Taking local control: Immigration policy activism in US cities and states, ed. VarsanyiMonica W., 73–93. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
RodriguezCristina M.2008. The significance of the local in immigration regulation. Michigan Law Review106:567–642.
22.
RosenblumM.2011. US immigration policy since 9/11: Understanding the stalemate over comprehensive immigration reform. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
23.
Rubaii-BarrettN.2008. Immigration reform: An intergovernmental imperative. ICMA policy issue white paper, 1–44, ICMA, Washington, DC.
24.
Rubaii-BarrettN.2009. The case for immigrant integration. Public Management91:22–26.
25.
SassenSaskia. 1996. Beyond sovereignty: Immigration policy making today. Social Justice23:9–20.
26.
SteilJustin PeterVasiIon Bogdan. 2014. The new immigration contestation: Social movements and local immigration policy making in the United States, 2000–2011. American Journal of Sociology119:1104–55.
27.
SuroRobertoSingerAudrey. 2002. Latino growth in metropolitan America: Changing patterns, new locations. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy in collaboration with the Pew Hispanic Center.
28.
Tat‐KeiHoAlfred. 2002. Reinventing local governments and the e‐government initiative. Public Administration Review62:434–44.
29.
TichenorDaniel J.2009. Navigating an American minefield: The politics of illegal immigration. The Forum7:1–21. doi: 10.2202/1540-8884.1325.
VarsanyiMonica. 2010a. City ordinances as ‘Immigration policing by proxy’: Local governments and the regulation of undocumented day laborers. In Taking local control: Immigration policy activism in US cities and states, ed. VarsanyiM., 135–56. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
32.
VarsanyiMonica. 2010b. Taking local control: Immigration policy activism in US cities and states. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
WalkerKyle E.2014. Immigration, local policy, and national identity in the suburban United States. Urban Geography35:508–29.
37.
WilliamsonAbigail. 2011. Beyond the passage of time: Local government response in new immigrant destinations. PhD, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
38.
WilliamsonAbigail. 2014. External forces, internal responses: Local government policies toward immigrants over time. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
39.
WindersJamie. 2012. Seeing immigrants Institutional visibility and immigrant incorporation in New Immigrant Destinations. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science641:58–78.
40.
ZunigaVictorHernandez-LeonRuben. 2005. New destinations: Mexican immigration in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
41.
BrennerChristine Thurlow. 2009a. Latina administrators in local government the interplay of role orientation and policy intentions. Administration & Society40:825–51.
42.
CadgeWendyCurranSaraNadya JaworskyB.LevittPeggy. 2010. The city as context: Culture and scale in new immigrant destinations. Amérique Latine Histoire et Mémoire. Les Cahiers ALHIM. Les Cahiers ALHIM (20). http://alhim.revues.org/3640 (accessed October 1, 2015).
43.
FurusethOwenSmithHeather. 2010. Localized immigration policy: The view from Charlotte, North Carolina, a new immigrant gateway. In Taking local control: Immigration policy activism in US cities and states, ed. VarsanyiMonica W., 173–92. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
44.
VicinoThomas J.2012. Suburban crossroads: The fight for local control of immigration policy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
45.
WalkerKyle E.LeitnerHelga. 2011. The variegated landscape of local immigration policies in the United States. Urban Geography32:156–78.
46.
WilliamsLinda M.2015. Beyond enforcement: Welcomeness, local law enforcement, and immigrants. Public Administration Review75:433–42.
47.
WilsonJ. H.DeRenzisB.SingerA.. 2010. Growing pains: Local response to resent immigrant settlement in suburban Washington, DC. In Taking local control: Immigration policy activism in US cities and states, ed. VarsanyiM., 193–216. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
48.
WindersJamie. 2011. Representing the immigrant: Social movements, political discourse, and immigration in the US South. Southeastern Geographer51:596–614.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
