Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-3
Does Absorptive Capacity Matter in the Impact of Immigration on Innovation in Africa? Evidence from Panel Quantile Regression with Nonadditive fixed Effects
This study aims to assess the role of absorptive capacity in the relationship between immigration and domestic innovation in sending countries using five average period data points from a sample of 35 African countries over the period 1995-2019. The results based on panel quantile regression with nonadditive fixed effects support the brain drain hypothesis, implying that immigration has negative heterogeneous effects on the innovation performance of sending countries. Our findings also revealed that absorptive capacity mitigates the negative effects of immigration when countries’ absorptive capacity reaches a certain threshold. These results suggest that strengthening the quality of institutions and physical infrastructures could mitigate the brain drain effect of immigration in Africa.
AghionP.HowittP.1992. “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction.” Econometrica60 (2): 323. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599
2.
AgrawalA.KapurD.McHaleJ.OettlA.2011. “Brain Drain or Brain Bank? The Impact of Skilled Emigration on Poor-Country Innovation.” Journal of Urban Economics69 (1): 43‐55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2010.06.003
3.
Arias-PérezJ.LozadaN.Henao-GarcíaE.2020. “When it Comes to the Impact of Absorptive Capacity on Co-innovation, How Really Harmful is Knowledge leakage?” Journal of Knowledge Management24 (8): 1841‐1857. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2020-0084
4.
BaiashviliT.GattiniL.2020. Impact of FDI on Economic Growth: The Role of Country Income Levels and Institutional Strength, 2. Luxembourg: European Investment Bank Working. Paper 2020/02.
5.
BeineM.DocquierF.RapoportH.2001. “Brain Drain and Economic Growth: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Development Economics64 (1): 275‐289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00133-4
6.
BernsteinS.DiamondR.McQuadeT.PousadaB.2018. The Contribution of High-Skilled Immigrants to Innovation in the United States. Stanford: In Stanford UniversityWorking Paper (No. 3748; Economics & Finance).
7.
BitlerM.GelbachJ.HoynesH.2004. What Mean Impacts Miss: Distributional Efects of Welfare Reform Experiments. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
8.
BlundellR.BondS.1998. “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics87 (1): 115‐143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
BrattiM.ContiC.2021. “The Effect of (Mostly Unskilled) Immigration on the Innovation of Italian Regions.” SSRN Electronic Journal. Working paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2396377
11.
ChoudhuryP.KimD. Y.2019. “The Ethnic Migrant Inventor Effect: Codification and Recombination of Knowledge Across Borders.” Strategic Management Journal40 (2): 203‐229. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2977
12.
CoadA.RaoR.2011. “The Firm-Level Employment Effects of Innovations in High-Tech US Manufacturing Industries.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics21 (2): 255‐283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-010-0209-x
13.
CohenM.LevinthalD.1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Strategic Learning in a Knowledge Economy35 (1): 128‐152. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080517889-9
14.
Cross, R. L., & Israelit, S. (2021). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. In Strategic Learning in a Knowledge Economy (pp. 57-86). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080517889-9
15.
Cruz-RosS.Guerrero-SánchezD. L.Miquel-RomeroM. J.2018. “Absorptive Capacity and its Impact on Innovation and Performance: Findings from SEM and fsQCA.” Review of Managerial Science15: 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0319-7
16.
DocquierF.RapoportH.2012. “Globalization, Brain Drain, and Development.” Journal of Economic Literature50 (3): 681‐730. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.3.681
17.
Domingues Dos SantosM.2006. “Attraction Des élites et Exode Des Cerveaux : Les Enjeux Economiques d’une Concertation Entre Pays d’Origine et Pays d’Accueil.” Horizons Stratégiques, N1 (1): 18‐27. https://doi.org/10.3917/hori.001.0018
18.
Ernest Miguelez, C. Fink. Measuring the international mobility of inventors: A new database. The International Mobility of Talent and Innovation. New Evidence and Policy Implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.114-161. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781316795774.005
19.
FacklerT. A.GiesingY.LaurentsyevaN.2020. “Knowledge Remittances: Does Emigration Foster Innovation?” Research Policy49 (9): 103863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103863
20.
FagerbergJ.VerspagenB.CaniëlsM.1997. “Technology, Growth and Unemployment Across European Regions.” Regional Studies31 (5): 457‐466. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409750132252
21.
FilippettiA.FrenzM.Ietto-GilliesG.2017. “The Impact of Internationalization on Innovation at Countries’ Level: The Role of Absorptive Capacity.” Cambridge Journal of Economics41 (2): bew032. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bew032
GiulianiE.BellM.2005. “The Micro-Determinants of Meso-Level Learning and Innovation: Evidence from a Chilean Wine Cluster.” Research Policy34 (1): 47‐68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.10.008
25.
GrubelH.ScottA.1966. “The International Flow of Human Capital.” The American Economic Review56 (1/2): 268-274.
26.
HafeezA.ShamsuddinA. B.SaeedB.MehmoodA.AndleebN.2020. “Exploring the Impact of Absorptive Capacity on Technology Transfer Effectiveness Mediated by Organizational Innovation: A Conceptual Framework.” International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research9 (3): 4779-4792.
27.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.2010. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. NJ, USA: Pearson Education.
28.
HammamiS.2021. “The Effect of Intellectual Property Protection on Innovation: Empirical Analysis of Developing Countries Panel.” African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development13: 397‐405. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2020.1824608
29.
HarrisR.KrenzA.MoffatJ.2021. “The Effects of Absorptive Capacity on Innovation Performance: A Cross-country Perspective.” Journal of Common Market Studies59 (3): 589‐607. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13108
HoungbedjiH. S.BassonguiN.2021. “Investissement Public et Investissement Privé en Afrique Subsaharienne: Rôle de la Qualité Institutionnelle.” African Development Review33 (3): 466-478. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12589
32.
IvanováE.GrmanováE.2021. “The Sustainability of eu Labor Immigration in Terms of Poverty Inequalities and Employment.” Sustainability (Switzerland)13 (4): 2265. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042265
33.
JansenJ. J. P.Van Den BoschF. A. J.VolberdaH. W.2006. “Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators.” Management Science52 (11): 1661‐1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
34.
JudeC.LevieugeG.2017. “Growth Effect of Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Economies: The Role of Institutional Quality.” World Economy40 (4): 715‐742. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12402
LaneP. J.KokaB. R.PathakS.2006. “The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct.” Academy of Management Review31 (4): 833‐863. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.22527456
LundvallB.-Å.1992. National Systems of Innovationtowards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
40.
MadsenJ. B.IslamM. R.AngJ. B.2010. “Catching up to the Technology Frontier: the Dichotomy Between Innovation and Imitation.” Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D’économique43 (4): 1389‐1411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2010.01618.x
41.
ArellanoM.BondS.1991. “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” Review of Economic Studies58: 277.
42.
MarianiF.2008. “Brain Drain R&D- Cost Differentials and the Innovation Gap.” Recherches Economiques de Louvain74 (3): 251‐272. https://doi.org/10.3917/rel.743.0251
43.
MendozaC.Morén-AlegretR.McAreaveyR.2020. “(Lifestyle) Immigrant Entrepreneurs in Spanish Small Villages: Rethinking International Immigration in rural Alt Empordà, Catalonia.” Belgeo1. https://doi.org/10.4000/BELGEO.44107
44.
MiroshnychenkoI.StroblA.MatzlerK.De MassisA.2021. “Absorptive Capacity, Strategic Flexibility, and Business Model Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Italian SMEs.” Journal of Business Research130: 670‐682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.015
NaghaviA.StrozziC.2015. “Intellectual Property Rights, Diasporas, and Domestic Innovation.” Journal of International Economics96 (1): 150‐161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.01.007
47.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. In Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511808678
Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Crescenzi, R. (2008). Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42(1).
50.
Qiu, S., Liu, X., & Gao, T. (2017). Do emerging countries prefer local knowledge or distant knowledge? Spillover effect of university collaborations on local firms. Research Policy, 46(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.001
51.
Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98( 5), Part 2, pp. S71-S102.
52.
SaxenianA.2005. “From Brain Drain to Brain Circulation: Transnational Communities and Regional Upgrading in India and China.” Studies in Comparative International Development40 (2): 35‐61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686293
53.
Saxenian, A. (2006). International Mobility of Engineers and the Rise of Entrepreneurship in the Periphery. Helsinki: In WIDER Research Paper (No. 142).
TangY.ChenY.WangK.XuH.YiX.2020. “An Analysis on the Spatial Effect of Absorptive Capacity on Regional Innovation Ability Based on Empirical Research in China.” Sustainability (Switzerland)12 (7): 3021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073021
57.
UNCTAD. 2015. Technology and Innovation Report 2015: Fostering Innovation Policies for Industrial Development. Issue December: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
58.
United Nations. (2019). International Migration 2019 report. St/Esa/Ser.a/438.
59.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2020). International Migrant Stock. United Nat. New York.
60.
WIPO Report. (2020). World Intellectual Property Indicators 2020. In World Intellectual Property Organization (Vol. 1). Geneva.
World Bank Group. 2021. World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
63.
XiongA.XiaS.YeZ. P.CaoD.JingY.LiH.2020. “Can Innovation Really Bring Economic Growth? The Role of Social Filter in China.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics53: 50‐61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2020.01.003
64.
YuwonoW.2021. “Empirical Analysis of Intellectual Capital, Potential Absorptive Capacity, Realized Absorptive Capacity and Cultural Intelligence on Innovation.” Management Science Letters11: 1399‐1406. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.10.034
65.
ZahraS. A.GeorgeG.2016. “Absorptive Capacity : A Review , Reconceptualization , and Extension.” Academy of Management Review27 (2): 185‐203.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
