The main purpose of the study in this paper is to establish to what extent accessibility to R&D and university-educated labor can explain regional export performance. This is done by estimating knowledge production functions, with total export value and number of high-valued exports in Swedish municipalities from 1997 to 1999 as outputs. The results in the paper indicate that accessibility to university-educated labor has the greatest positive effects. The value of exported products is mainly affected by local accessibility to university-educated labor (and company R&D). The intra- and inter-regional accessibilities play a more important role when the number of high-valued export products in Swedish municipalities is the output.
Acs, Z.J., l. Anselin, and A. Varga.2002. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy31: 1069-85.
2.
Andersson, M., and O. Ejermo.2004a. How does accessibility to knowledge sources affect the innovativeness of corporations?-Evidence from Sweden. Annals of Regional Science39(4): 741-65.
3.
Andersson, M., and O. Ejermo.2004b. ''Sectoral Knowledge Production in Swedish Regions 19931999,'' In Knowledge Spillovers and Knowledge Management, eds. C. Karlsson, P. Flensburg, and S-Å Hörte.Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
4.
Andersson, M., and C. Karlsson.2005. Knowledge accessibility and regional economic growth. Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 40, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS.
5.
Andersson, Å.E.1985. Kreativitet: Storstadens framtid (Creativity: The future of the metropolis). Stockholm: Prisma.
6.
Andersson, Å.E., and B. Johansson.1984. Knowledge intensity and product cycles in metropolitan regions, WP-84-13, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis A-2361, Laxenburg, Austria.
7.
Anselin L.2003. Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers, and spatial econometrics. International Regional Science Review26 (2): 153-66.
8.
Anselin L.1988. Lagrange multiplier test diagnostics for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity. Geographical Analysis20: 1-17.
9.
Anselin L., and R. Florax , eds. 1995. New directions in spatial econometrics . Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
10.
Anselin L., A. Varga, and Z. Acs.1997. Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics42: 422-48.
11.
Anselin, L., A. Varga, and Z. Acs.2000. Geographic spillovers and university research: A spatial econometric perspective. In Special Issue on Endogenous Growth: Models and Regional Policy, Growth and Change, eds. P. Nijkamp P. and R. Stough, 501-16.
12.
Arnold, J.M., and K. Hussinger.2005. Export behavior and firm productivity in German manufacturing: A firm-level analysis. Review of World Economics141 (2): 219-43.
13.
Audretsch, D.B., and M.P. Feldman.1996. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review86 (3): 630-40.
14.
Audretsch, D.B., E.E. Lehman, and S. Warning.2005. University spillovers and new firm location . Research Policy34:1113-22.
15.
Baldwin, R.E.1971. Determinants of the commodity structure of U.S. trade . American Economic Review March: 126-46.
16.
Basile, R.2001. Export behaviour of Italian manufacturing firms over the nineties: The role of innovation. Research Policy30:1185-1201.
17.
Batten, D.F.1982. On the dynamics of industrial evolution. Regional Science and Urban Economics12: 449-62.
18.
Beckman, M.2000. Interurban knowledge networks. In Learning, innovation and the urban evolution, eds. D. Batten et al. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19.
Bernard, A.B., and B. Jensen, B.1999. Exceptional exporter performance: Cause, effect, or both?Journal of International Economics47 (1): 1-25.
20.
Bertuglia, C., and S. Occelli.2000. Impact of new information technologies on economic-spatial systems: Towards an agenda for future research. In Learning, innovation and the urban evolution, eds. D. Batten et al. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
21.
Bigsten, A., P. Collier.S. Dercon, M. Fafchamps, B. Gauthier, J.W. Gunning, J. Haraburema, A. Oduro, R. Oostendorp, C. Pattillo, M. Söderbom, F. Teal, and A. Zeufack.2004. Do African manufacturing firms learn from exporting? Centre for the Study of African Economies Working Paper. Journal of Development Studies40 (3): 115-41.
22.
Bottazzi, L., and G. Peri.2003. Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data. European Economic Review47: 687-710.
23.
Breschi S., and D. Palma.1999. Localized knowledge spillovers and trade competitiveness: The case of Italy. In Innovation, networks and localities, eds. M. Fischer, L.Suarez-Villa, and M. Steiner.Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
24.
Burridge, P.1980. On the Cliff-Ord test for spatial autocorrelation . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B42:107-108.
25.
Clerides, S.K., S. Lach, and J. Tybout.1998. Is learning-by-exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Morocco, and Mexico. Quarterly Journal of Economics113 (3): 903-47.
26.
Cliff, A., and J.K. Ord.1972. Testing for spatial autocorrelation among regression residuals. Geographical Analysis4:267-84.
27.
Cole, S.1981. Income and employment effects in a model of innovation and transfer of technology. In Methods for development planning: Scenarios, models and micro studies. Paris: The Unesco Press, 236-57.
28.
Dixit, R., and V. Norman.1980. Theory of international trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Fagerberg, J.1988. International competitiveness. Economic Journal98: 355-74.
30.
Feldman, M.P.1994. The geography of innovation. Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
31.
Feldman, M.P., and R. Florida.1994. The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers84: 210-29.
32.
Fischer, M.M., and A. Varga.2003. Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria. Annals of Regional Science37: 303-22.
33.
Fritsch, M., and V. Slavtchev.2005. The role of regional knowledge for innovation , ERSA conference paper, Amsterdam2005.
34.
Gould, W.W.1992. Quantile regression with bootstrapped standard errors . Stata Technical Bulletin9: 19-21.
Greenhalgh, C., P. Taylor, and R. Wilson.1994. Innovation and export volumes and prices, a disaggregated study. Oxford Economic Papers46: 102-34.
37.
Griliches, Z.1979. Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics10: 92-116.
38.
Grossman, G.M., and E. Helpman.1991. Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
39.
Gråsjö U.2004. The importance of accessibility to R&D on patent production in Swedish municipalities. Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 19, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS.
40.
Helpman, E.1981. International trade in presence of product differentiation, economies of scale and monopolistic competition: A Chamberlain-Heckscher-Ohlin approach. Journal of International Economics11: 305-40.
41.
Helpman, E., and P. Krugman.1985. Market structure and foreign trade . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press .
42.
Hirsch, S.1967. Location of industry and international competitiveness . Oxford: Clarendon Press.
43.
Hordijk L.1974. Spatial correlation in the disturbances of a linear interregional model. Regional and Urban Economics4: 117-40.
44.
Jacobs, J.1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage Books.
45.
Jaffe, A.B.1989. Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review79: 957-70.
46.
Jaffe, A.B., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson.1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics108: 577-98.
47.
Johansson, B., and Å.E. Andersson .1998. A Scloss Laxenburg model of product cycle dynamics. In Knowledge and networks in a dynamic economy , eds. M. J. Beckmann, B. Johansson, F. Snickars , and R. Thord, 181-219. Berlin-Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag.
48.
Johansson, B., and C. Karlsson.1987. Processes of industrial change: Scale, location and type of Job. In Regional labour market analysis , eds. M. Fischer and P. Nijkamp.Amsterdam: North-Holland.
49.
Johansson, B., and C. Karlsson.2001. Geographic transaction costs and specialisation opportunities of small and medium-sized regions: Scale economies and market extension. In Theories of endogenous growth-Lessons for regional policies, eds. B. Johansson and R. Stough.Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
50.
Johansson, B., and J. Klaesson.2001. Förhandsanalys av Förändringar i Transport- och Bebyggelsesystem, JIBS.
51.
Johansson, B., J. Klaesson, and M. Olsson.2002. Time distances and labor market integration . Papers in Regional Science81: 305-27.
52.
Johansson, B., J. Klaesson, and M. Olsson.2003. Commuters' non-linear response to time distances. Journal of Geographical Systems5 (3): 315-29.
53.
Karlsson, C.1988. Innovation adoption and the product life cycle. Umeå Economic Studies No. 185, University of Umeå.
54.
Karlsson, C., and A. Manduchi.2001. Knowledge spillovers in a spatial context . In Knowledge, complexity and innovation systems, eds. M. Fischer and J. Fröhlich.Berlin: Springer-Verlag .
55.
Keesing, D.B.1966. Labor skills and comparative advantage. American Economic Review May: 249-58.
56.
Kenen, P.1965. Nature, capital and trade. Journal of Political Economy October, 437-60.
57.
Kleinknecht, A., K. Van Montfort, and E. Brouwer.2002. The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators. Economics of Innovation and New Technology11: 109-21.
58.
Koenker, R., and G. Bassett.1978. Regression quantiles. Econometrica46 (1): 33-50.
59.
Koenker, R., and G. Bassett.1982. Robust tests for heteroscedasticity based on regression quantiles. Econometrica50: 43-61.
60.
Kravis, I.B.1956. Availability and other influences on the commodity composition of trade. Journal of Political Economy April: 143-55.
61.
Krugman, P.1979. Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade. Journal of International Economics9: 469-79.
62.
Krugman, P.1980. Scale economies, product differentiation and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review70: 950-59.
63.
Krugman, P.1981. Trade, accumulation and uneven development. Journal of Development Economics8: 149-61.
64.
Lancaster, K.1980. Intra-industry trade under perfect monopolistic competition . Journal of Regional Science33: 129-44.
65.
Marshall, A.1920. Principles of economics, 8th ed. London: Macmillan.
66.
Martellato, D., P. Nijkamp, and A. Reggiani.1998. Measurement and measures of network accessibility: Economic perspectives. In Transport networks in Europe: Concepts, analysis and policies, eds. K. Button, P. Nijkamp, and H. Priemus, 161-80. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
67.
Norton, R.D., and J. Rees.1979. The product cycle and the spatial decentralization of American manufacturing. Regional Studies13 (2): 141-51.
68.
Ohlin, B.1933. Interregional and international trade. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
69.
Polanyi, M.1966. The tacit dimension. London : Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
70.
Posner, M.V.1961. International trade and technical change. Oxford Economic Papers13: 323-41.
71.
Rogers, W.H.1992. Quantile regression standard errors. Stata Technical Bulletin9: 16-19.
72.
Ronde, P., and C. Hussler.2005. Innovation in regions: What does really matter. Research Policy34: 1150-72.
73.
Vernon, R.1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics80: 190-207.
74.
Varga, A.1998. University research and regional innovation: A spatial econometric analysis of academic technology transfers. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
75.
Varga, A.2000a. Local academic knowledge spillovers and the concentration of economic activity. Journal of Regional Science40: 289-309.
76.
Varga, A.2000b. Universities in local innovation systems. In Regional innovation, knowledge and global change, ed. Z. Acs.New York: Pinter.
77.
Varga, A.2001. Universities and regional economic development: Does agglomeration matter? In Theories of endogenous growth , eds. B. Johansson, C. Karlsson , and R. R. Stough.Berlin: Springer-Verlag .
78.
Wakelin, K.1998. Innovation and export behaviour at the firm level . Research Policy26 (7-8): 829-41.
79.
Weibull, J.1976. An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility . Regional Science and Urban Economics6: 357-79.
80.
Wilson, P.The export competitiveness of dynamic Asian economies 1983-1995: A dynamic shift-share approach. Journal of Economic Studies27: 541-65.
81.
Yamada, H., 1998. A note on the causality between export and productivity: An empirical re-examination. Economics Letters61: 111-14.
