As residential Internet access in the United States shifts toward high-speed connections, a gap has emerged in rural high-speed access relative to urban high-speed access. Potential causes of this high-speed ``digital divide'' include rural—urban differences in people, place, and infrastructure. In this article, Current Population Survey data from 2000, 2001, and 2003 are combined with novel infrastructure data to determine the relative roles of these factors in the rural—urban divide. Bootstrapped decompositions of logit model results demonstrate that rural—urban differences in income and in network externalities, but not in infrastructure, are the dominant causes of the high-speed gap.
Bauer, J.2005.
Regulation and state ownership: Conflicts and complementarities in EU telecommunications
. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics76:
151-77
.
2.
Bimber, B.2000.
Measuring the gender gap on the Internet
. Social Science Quarterly81:
868-76
.
3.
Blinder, A.1973.
Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural variables
. Journal of Human Resources8:
436-55
.
4.
Chakraborty, J.
, and
M. Bosman.2005.
Measuring the digital divide in the United States: Race, income, and personal computer ownership
. The Professional Geographer57:
395-410
.
5.
Consumer Electronics Association.2006. Broadband and the home of tomorrow—March 2006. Used with Permission.
6.
Cooper, M.
, and
G. Kimmelman.1999. The digital divide confronts the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Washington DC: Consumer Federation of America
.
7.
Downes, T.
, and
S. Greenstein.2002.
Universal access and local Internet markets in the US. ResearchPolicy31:
1035-52
.
8.
Fairlie, R.2003. An extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique to logit and probit models.
Economic Growth Center: Yale University
. Paper Number 873.
9.
Federal Communications Commission (FCC)—Industry Analysis and Technology Division.2004. High speed services for Internet access: Status as of June 30, 2004. Available at http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/comp.html
10.
Fellows, D.2005. How women and men use the Internet. Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://pewinternet.org/
11.
Gillett, S.
,
W. Lehr
, and
C. Osorio.2004.
Local Government Broadband Initiatives. TelecommunicationsPolicy28:
537-58
.
12.
———. 2006.
Municipal electric utilities' role in telecommunication services
. Telecommunications Policy30:
464-80
.
13.
Gooding, H.2005. Identifying critical factors for developing effective rural community technology centers. Unpublished Dissertation.
West Virginia University, College of Human Resources and Education
.
14.
Graham, S.
, and
A. Aurigi.1997.
Virtual cities, social polarization, and the crisis in urban public space
. Journal of Urban Technology4:
19-52
.
15.
Greenstein, S.
, and
M. Lizardo.1999. Determinants of the regional distribution of information technology infrastructure in U.S. In The electronic village: Public policy issues of the information economy, edited by
Dale Orr
and
TomWilson
.
Toronto: C. D. Howe Institute
.
16.
Griliches, Z.1957.
Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change
. Econometrica25:
501-22
.
17.
Grubesic, T.
, and
M. O'Kelly.2002.
Using points of presence to measure accessibility to the commercial Internet
. The Professional Geographer54:
259-78
.
18.
Horrigan, J.B.2001. Online communities: Networks that nurture long-distance relationships and local ties.
Pew Internet & American Life Project
. http://pewinternet.org/
19.
———. 2004. PEW Internet data project memo: Home broadband adoption has increased 60% in the past year and use of DSL lines is surging.
Pew Internet and American Life Project
. http://pewinternet.org/
20.
———. 2006. Home broadband adoption 2006: Home broadband adoption is going mainstream and that means user generated content is coming from all kinds of Internet users.
Pew Internet and American Life Project
. http://pewinternet.org/
21.
Knowledge Networks, 2006. Spring 2006 ownership and trend report. The Home Technology Monitor. November.
22.
Kruger, L.2005. Broadband Internet access and the digital divide: Federal assistance programs.
Congressional Research Service—The Library of Congress
.
23.
Leighton, W.A.2001.
Broadband deployment and the digital divide
. Cato Policy Analysis No. 410. August 7.
24.
Malecki, E.J.2003.
Digital development in rural areas: Potentials and pitfalls
. Journal of Rural Studies19:
201-14
.
25.
McConnaughey, J.
, and
W. Lader.1998. Falling through the Net II: New data on the digital divide. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/net2/falling.html
26.
Mills, B.F.
and
B. Whitacre.2003.
Understanding the non-metropolitan—metropolitan digital divide
. Growth and Change34:
219-43
.
27.
Miniaci, R.
, and
M. Parisi.2006.
Social interactions and the digital divide: Identification and policy implications
. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy5: article 29.
28.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA).1995. Falling through the Net: A survey of the ``have nots'' in rural and urban America.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce
.
29.
———. 1998. Falling through the Net II: New data on the digital divide .
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce
.
30.
———. 1999. Falling through the Net: Defining the digital divide.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce
.
31.
———. 2002. A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce
.
32.
Neumark, D.1988.
Employers discriminatory behavior and the estimation of wage discrimination
. Journal of Human Resources23:
279-95
.
33.
Oaxaca, R.1973.
Male-female differentials in urban labor markets
. International Economic Review14:
693-709
.
34.
Oaxaca, R.
, and
M. Ransom.1994.
On discrimination and decomposition of wage differentials
. Journal of Econometrics.61:
5-21
.
35.
Pinkham Group.2002. DSL deployment analysis of RBOCs and independent LECs in metropolitan and rural areas—Q42001. Available at http://www.dslprime.com/a/pinkham_deployment.htm
36.
Prieger, J.2003.
The supply side of the digital divide: Is there equal availability in the broadband Internet access market?Economic Inquiry41:
346-63
.
37.
Rose, R.2003. Oxford internet survey results.
Oxford
, UK:
The Oxford Internet Institute
.
38.
Servon, L.
, and
M. Nelson.2001.
Community technology centers: Narrowing the digital divide in low-income, urban communities
. Journal of Urban Affairs23:
279-90
.
39.
Sinai, T.
, and
J. Waldfogel.2004.
Geography and the Internet: Is the Internet a substitute or a complement for cities?Journal of Urban Economics56:
1-24
.
40.
Strover, S.2001.
Rural Internet connectivity. TelecommunicationsPolicy25:
331-47
.
41.
Television and Cable Factbook, Cable and Services. 2000. Number 68: Cable Volumes 1-2.
Washington, DC: Warren Publishing Inc
.
