Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Regional science research requires data sets with detailed geography. Dissemination of data sets with sufficient geographic specificity challenges statistical agencies in terms of protecting respondent privacy. The U.S. Census Bureau first released decennial census microdata in the 1960s. Today, public versions of largely demographic surveys enjoy widespread use but limit the geographic detail of individual observations. With business data, firm and establishment distributions are highly skewed, preventing release of public use microdata versions. To support its own statistical programs by giving external researchers access to internal versions of public use data files, the Census Bureau created the Center for Economic Studies (CES) and a national network of Research Data Centers (RDCs). This model permits researchers access to confidential economic and demographic data under secure, controlled conditions. This article describes the CES-RDC enterprise, provides descriptions of available data sets and their spatial identifiers, and outlines issues and challenges facing the RDC network.

Keywords

analytic research longitudinal microdata confidential microdata

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bartelsman, E. , and M. Doms . 2000. Understanding productivity: Lessons from longitudinal micro-data. Journal of Economic Literature 38: 569-594.

Bayer, P. , S. Ross , and G. Topa . 2005. Place of work and place of residence: Informal hiring networks and labor market outcomes. CES Working Paper 05-23, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau, Suitland, MD.

Davis, S. , J. Haltiwanger , R. Jarmin , C. J. Krizan , J. Miranda , A. Nucci , and K. Sandusky . 2006. Measuring the dynamics of young and small businesses: Integrating the employer and nonemployer universes. CES Working Paper 06-04, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau, Suitland, MD.

Davis, S. J. , J. Halitwanger , and S. Schuh . 1996. Job creation and destruction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dunn, T. , M. Roberts , and L. Samuelson . 1988. Patterns of firm entry and exit in U.S. manufacturing industries. Rand Journal of Economics 19: 495-515.

Ellis, Mark , Richard Wright , and Virginia Parks . 2004. Work together, live apart? Geographies of racial and ethnic segregation at home and at work. Annals, Association of American Geographers 94: 620-637.

Erickson, Rodney A. 1989. Export performance and state industrial growth. Economic Geography 65: 280-292.

Essletzbichler, Jurgen . 2004. The geography of job creation and destruction in the U.S. manufacturing sector, 1967-1997. Annals, Association of American Geographers 94: 602-619.

Foster, L. 2004. The Appalachian economy, establishment and employment dynamics, 1982-1997: Evidence from the Longitudinal Business Database. Research Report. Washington, DC: Appalachian Regional Commission.

10.

Govoni, John , and James Monahan . 1986. The longitudinal establishment data file: Access and limitations. Presented to the Census Advisory Committee of the American Economic Association, Washington, DC, April 10-11.

11.

Heckman, J. 2001. Micro data, heterogeneity, and the evaluation of public policy: Nobel lecture. Journal of Political Economy 109: 673-748.

12.

Israilevich, P. R. , J. D. Geoffrey Hewings , G. R. Schindler , and R. Mahidhara . 1996. The choice of input-output table embedded in regional econometric input-output models. Papers in Regional Science 75: 103-119.

13.

Jarmin, R. , S. Klimek , and J. Miranda . 2006. Evolution of U.S. retail in metropolitan, micropolitan, and rural areas. In Producer dynamics: New evidence from micro data, ed. J. B. Jensen , T. Dunne , and M. Roberts . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

14.

Jarmin, R. , and J. Miranda . 2003. The Longitudinal Business Database: A primer. In Proceedings of the 2002 Joint Statistical Meetings, 1626-1631. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.

15.

Leichenko, Robin , and Julie Silva . 2004. International trade, employment, and earnings: Evidence from U.S. rural counties. Regional Studies 38: 355-374.

16.

McGuckin, Robert H. 1990. Longitudinal economic data at the Census Bureau: A new database yields fresh insight on some old issues. CES Working Paper 90-1, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau, Suitland, MD.

17.

McGuckin, Robert H. 1992. Analytic use of economic microdata: A model for researcher access with confidentiality protection. CES Working Paper 92-8, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau, Suitland, MD.

18.

McGuckin, Robert H. , and George A. Pascoe . 1988. The Longitudinal Research Database: Status and research possibilities. Survey of Current Business 68: 30-37.

19.

(2nd ICPSR version, Ann Arbor, MI, Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [ICPSR], 1998)

20.

Ono, Y. 2003. Outsourcing business services and the role of central administrative offices. Journal of Urban Economics 53: 377-395.

21.

Ruggles, Steven , and Russell Menard . 1995. The Minnesota historical census projects. Historical Methods 28: 6-10.

22.

U. S. Census Bureau . 2005. Research at the Center for Economic Studies and the Research Data Center: 2000—2004. CES Research Report. Suitland, MD: Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.

Regional Analysis Using Census Bureau Microdata at the Center for Economic Studies

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References